Period 2007 – 2009 Contd.
Ali Baba in Mumbai – Eid 2008 Reflections
December 09, 2008
Dateline Eid-ul-Adha, California, Tuesday, December 09, 2008
There is a concerted effort worldwide to once again resurrect the same fabricated ‘al qaeeda’ boogiemen in the aftermath of the Mumbai terrorist act. It is shameful that many an educated Pakistani has also become an unwitting participant in also coloring these mantras, each according to his or her own inclination. I reservedly say ‘unwitting’ because surely many are well intentioned, and merely misled like their brethren in the West. The mercenaries of course are another matter, for they willingly spread disinformation – through both commission by spinning falsehoods, and omission by refraining to disclose historical facts in full forensic perspective – in the service of their higher masters, up the chain of management. The grotesquely manufactured reality of ‘Al-Qaeeda’, ‘Bin Laden’, et. al., was unraveled in the following succinct Project Humanbeingsfirst report dated May 11 2008: The WAR on TERROR 2008 Omnibus Collection (PDF). Its Abstract reads as follows:
This is a short collection of already published reports and essays of Project Humanbeingsfirst which minimally expands upon the simplification of modernity as expressed on the project’s website: What is all this verbiage by Project HumanbeingsfirstTM really all about? Is there a reductionist and simplified explanation in terms of first principles for all this complexity of modernity that gives birth to such urgent matters of human concern in the first place? Yes. In the simplest terms: “Might defines right” leads to “Hegemony is as old as mankind”, which in turn leads to “If we don’t have real enemies then we have to create or imagine some and yell ‘we are being attacked’” in order to a) justify one’s hegemonic barbarianism upon others; and b) motivate an unwilling plebeian peoples into sacrificing for the conquests of the ruling elite. Euphemistically: “imperial mobilization”. Grotesquely: “quest for Lebensraum”. That’s all there is to it. This omnibus, comprising a total of 23304 words, minimalistically elaborates on the above single sentence, in any of its variations, in the context of modernity du jour.
It is important for all of us, Pakistanis, Indians, the world public – or at least the thinking among us – to begin to look beyond the ‘katputli tamashas’ being enacted for us. There is far more going on than meets the eye. The motivation for this atrocious puppetshow in Mumbai was elaborated upon yesterday in the essay The Mumbai Terrorist Act: An International Chorus of Actors! Ushering in one-world government requires international cooperation among its harbingers!
The ‘maasi museebte’* is not the problem for those watching the puppetshow – even if, once in a while, she reaches out from behind the television screen with her new and improved ‘jahroo’ (broom) and whacks those sitting in the front row! These days, instead of an ordinary tinka (straw) ‘jahroo’, it just happens to be an explosive ‘jahroo’, but same idea.
As a matter of scientific inquiry, perhaps one might ponder upon this phenomenon. If people are empirically feeling the effects of the ‘maasi’s jahroo’ on their faces while watching ‘Kaliyan’, then what might be a rational and scientific explanation?
Please just do this mental exercise, even if only as an interesting thought experiment, and even if you truly feel that ‘maasi museebte’ is ‘god’ and can indeed reach out from her barren perch in Afghanistan and bring down a mighty super-power to its knees with merely a cell phone and laptops, never mind a mere smack on the head with a ‘jahroo’ from hell (or from behind the tv screen). How would you create such an existential experiment? This is how black-ops does it too – with smoke-and-mirrors, and with copious help from patsies and mercenaries.
There is no ‘Al qaeeda’, no ‘Bin Laden’ – these are fanciful abstractions constructed for the purpose explained in the above report. As the case in all enduring believable myths, it is much more effective to build them on something which is existent, and not entirely immanent. Thus it is easier for people to accept it, especially for those with short term memories – that’s most of us in the West. Thus there was indeed a real person called Bin Laden. Pakistani journalist Hamid Mir even interviewed him ( http://www.dawn.com/2001/11/10/top1.htm ), as did the British journalist Robert Fisk. The mythological boogieman is fashioned upon a real character, a real CIA asset, but it is no different than ‘Ali Baba’! Even the FBI does not blame the real one for 911 – see the snapshot of their most-wanted poster of him as of April 22 2008.
But of course, empire makers well understand that the pursuit of “full spectrum dominance” can be “uncongenial to democratic instincts”, as the “economic self-denial (that is defense spending), and the human sacrifice (casualties even among professional soldiers) required in the effort” makes “democracy … inimical to imperial mobilization.” The planners at the RAND Corporation, the AEI, et. al., also keenly perceive that “… as America becomes an increasingly multicultural society, it may find it more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues, except in the circumstance of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat. …. More generally, cultural change in America may also be uncongenial to the sustained exercise abroad of genuinely imperial power. That exercise requires a high degree of doctrinal motivation, intellectual commitment, and patriotic gratification.”
And that is where the boogiemen come in, to manufacture that “circumstance of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat.” The more fanciful the better.
What can be more imaginative than an omnipotent, omnipresent, evil ‘Ali Baba’ who can bring down 4 airliners in the most armed to the teeth sole superpower – in the entire history of mankind one might add – from a desolate perch in the Hindu Kush with only box-cutters, and ram them at 500 mph into tall buildings spectacularly collapsing them into their own foot-prints at almost free-fall speed? Even more miraculously, collapsing one of the tall buildings, WTC-7, entirely magically without any airplane hitting it! But since no one will buy a mind-melding ‘yoda’ from Star Wars doing this, he is simply aliased to a once upon a time real character who used to be a CIA asset. Everyone had heard of him valiantly serve the imperial interests as their controlled patsy – or more aptly as the “moral equivalent of our founding fathers” – but who was now projected to have turned against his own patron saints due to “Militant Islam” and its doctrine of global “Triumphalism” leading to a “Clash of Civilizations”! Simply embellishing a real person with some ‘magic-carpet’ powers right out of a children’s story book has been far more effective than having to invent a character who had never existed. With the art of disinformation and psyops perfected to the precision of a hard science, and all the world’s newsmedia under the control of the “Mighty Wurlitzer”, it has been rather easy!
Similarly, distorting Islam to present it as antediluvian and out to aggressively conquer the world, has been far more effective than inventing a new “doctrinal motivation” from scratch. Especially, since the ‘Islamofascists‘ from the previous harvest were already available, ripe for re-harvesting. Their mentality was so well understood by all the ‘Rand Corporations’ along the Potomac, that they specifically targeted Afghanistan and Pakistan’s border region for this re-harvest, knowing fully well the natives’ thousand year tradition of ‘Pakhtoonwali’ – you kill an Afghani’s (Pathan’s) family, drop bombs on his wedding gathering, burn and torture his women and children, and you have a thousand recruits ready to take perpetual revenge on the infidels regardless of cost. And what is better than to have their own kind do this to them? Thus enter the Pakistan’s subservient military bombing their own civilians in the pristine tribal belt of Pakistan – the home to those who hold their ‘Pakhtoonwali’ tradition more sacred than any other heritage. These are people unlike any other on the face of the earth. While all have been conquered or colonized by others, only these tribal populations have resisted all occupation since time immemorial, jealously guarding their freedoms and their independence, and also retaining their ancient traditions. A Machiavelli astutely learned in political science and psyops, and commandeering the world’s sole superpower’s awesome military might, can use them like a child’s putty!
In 2007, while the ‘Army Act 2007’ was still in effect, I offered two Pakistani military men, recently retired 3-star generals, whom I had occasion to partake a meal with in Islamabad, that I could craft any terrorist to their specification for them for a mere $15000 – a number that I conjured up out of thin air thinking it was suitably low to impress upon them how easy it was to harvest the surviving victims whose parents, wives, daughters, sons, had been bombed to smithereens, who had nothing to look forward to in life except the abyss of hunger, deprivation, and alienation, and especially from among those holding the ‘Pakhtoonwali’ tradition. I was trying to rationally talk them out of bombing our own peoples in the tribal belt in this fictional ‘war on terror’ by explaining to them how Machiavellian political science works. I had held their attention for over 3-1/2 hours. And I was rather stunned when one of the 3-star generals of Pakistan’s Army, and let me hasten to add (Retired), responded to my ‘jihadi manufacturing challenge’ with “Zahir you are asking too much, I could do it for $2000”!
Indeed! Yet they continue to bomb our own peoples. They deliberately destroyed the lal-masjid in Islamabad with such barbaric ferociousness directly under the ‘shock and awe’ orders from the Pentagon, knowing fully well where the destabilization impact of the subsequent retaliations will be felt. It isn’t rocket science for anyone, let alone for a professional standing Army’s American trained high command! See my gut-wrenching missive that I composed in tears in the summer of 2007 knowing fully well what was going on and what will happen: “Saving Pakistan from Synthetic ‘Terror Central’”. After meeting the Pakistani Generals and realizing that while they were highly educated and immensely experienced in the art of war-making, they understood very little of political science – men of obeying orders that they were as part of their professional training – and I composed the following long open letter to a hypothetical Pakistani General, addressing all of Pakistan’s senior military cadre employing this encounter as a literary device: “Re-Imagining Pakistan’s Defenses – Open Letter to a Pakistani General”. But who listens to an ordinary common man’s commonsense? In all likelihood, no one even read that letter. And exactly on Eid ul-Adha Day 2007 that same year, I had made the following plea: “Wakeup to the grotesque reality of the ‘Grand Chessboard’!” The same plea, a year later, has become even more prescient in the aftermath of the Mumbai Terrorist Act. And as the good President of United States of America has publicly stated:
“Good morning [America]. At this moment, somewhere in the world, terrorists are planning new attacks on our country. Their goal is to bring destruction to our shores that will make September the 11th pale by comparison.” (President of the United States, George W. Bush, Feb. 13, 2008)
Another 911 anywhere in the world and the American President, incumbent and newly-elected, will know exactly where to bomb, as Pakistan’s Ambassador Hussein Haqqani had re-confirmed:
‘[On] Wednesday, a media report quoted Pakistan’s envoy to Washington as saying that US leaders had warned Islamabad that if the United States suffered an attack that was traced back to Pakistan Washington would retaliate. “Those (statements) have been made,” Ambassador Hussain Haqqani told editors and reporters at The Washington Post. “We want to make sure that it doesn’t come to that.” (Dawn, June 12, 2008)
How remarkably easy it has been for most of humanity to be duped into this fabricated ‘war on terror’ with the help of our own mercenaries in power! Not one of them has the gall to stand up and announce – “war on terror is fiction”! Watch the following 2005 presentation in the documentary ZERO ( youtube.com/watch?v=AfxioFvvRX4 ), made by CSIS to the commission of the European parliament for security and defense, as narrated by one of its attendee members, where he makes the following statement of fact:
Begin Transcription (by Project Humanbeingsfirst):
“In the summer of 2005, the commission of the European parliament for security and defense, of which I am a member, was invited to a special screening created by the Washington Center for Strategic [and International] Studies”
(Slide: CSIS Debating 21st Century Nuclear Issues, Edited by Owen C. W. Price and Jenifer Mackby, subtitled Black-Dawn: Scenario-Based Exercise, dated: May 3 2004)
“We were asked to watch a film which depicted what would happen in Europe, if Brussels was hit by a nuclear bomb.”
“Fifty thousand deaths, hundred thousand injured. The reactions of various European governments.”
“Suddenly, footage of Osama Bin Laden claiming responsibility for a nuclear attack on NATO headquarters comes on screen.”
“All members of the parliament, myself included, were rendered speechless.”
“American experts from the Center for Strategic Studies, were on hand to explain the action on the screen.”
“Then a parliamentarian finally said: Today we were shown a convincing demonstration of how Osama Bin Laden’s image can be completely manipulated. All the Osama’s we have seen over the years, may never have existed. Just as a nuclear attack on NATO Headquarters in Brussels has never taken place.”
End Transcription. (ZERO: An Investigation Into 9/11, part 8, first few minutes of the clip)
How can one prove what I write here, that the ‘war on terror’ is fiction? That “Bin Laden” is “Ali Baba”? And that the Mumbai Terrorist Act was a false-flag operation, just like 911 was?
The same way that any sound judge in a court room would – especially one like Robert Jackson at Nuremberg! Short of that – and it was a victor’s justice, nothing more – well-intentioned peoples must endeavor to at least learn the truth stripped of its complex psyops, even if they remain afraid of articulating what they learn out loud. At least, they will knowingly not spew garbage, or create disinformation, or cultivate red herrings, as this ‘champion of justice and humanity’ recently did: “Rebuttal to Paul Craig Roberts’: ‘Washington Arrogance has Fomented a Muslim Revolution’”. There are tens of thousands of ‘Paul Craig Roberts’ in Pakistan, as elsewhere, beginning with Pakistan’s own co-opted ruling elite, down to its ‘enlightened-moderated’ newsmedia, NGOs, academics, industrialists, et. al. Paul Craig Roberts was gentle enough to only bestow upon me the honorific “you are a completely stupid fool, a disgrace to humanity” when I called him on his disinformation. I actually carry that invective with much pride and it is the only honor I have received thus far from the hectoring hegemons, apart from their visit to my home in 2003! Other benedictions may not be so merciful. For the mercenaries among them deliberately subverting our nations in perpetuating this fiction of ‘war on terror’ – be it America, Pakistan, India, and every other – there is the hangman’s noose to look forward to.
The way the Rockefellers have it orchestrated however, the one-world government – the raison d’être for all this death and mayhem of humanity – is almost fait accompli! In that new world order, the present would look like the good old days! PCR’s honorific, a blessing! I use the word ‘almost’ deliberately because I continue to believe that there is many a slip between the cup and lip! If only the plebeians can learn to overcome our voluntary servitude!
It is only befitting to use Elie Wiesel’s eloquence to close these despondent Eid reflections, for a cataclysm of no less torment has indeed befallen those who have finally seen the end of war:
“I still curse the killers, their accomplices, the indifferent spectators who knew and kept silent, and Creation itself, Creation and those who perverted and distorted it. I feel like screaming, howling like a madman so that that world, the world of the murderers, might know it will never be forgiven.”
* ‘maasi museebte’, as I recall my childhood memories, was a character in the 1970s’ popular Pakistani television puppetshow ‘Kaliyan’. Similar to Sesame Street.
No Exits on this Super-Highway!
September 30, 2008*
As the grotesque raping and disillusionment of America by “The Creation of the Second Great Depression” proceeds with an expert chess-player’s grace, a bigger scale invasion of Pakistan by the oligarchs running the United States appears imminent in order to save the world from those other ‘terrorists’.
And the oligarchs have copious help from insiders.
In the case of the United States, it’s her own Congress.
The accurately predicted initial defeat of the bailout package by a mere loss of 12 votes (228 to 205) is to be rectified shortly, as the Wall Street has fully implemented the President’s scare-mongering dire warning with real teeth! The Congress folks will now be getting frantic calls and emails to reverse their previous vote! At least some of the 228 courageous souls had surely only voted NO in fear of a re-election loss due to their electorates voting with their own feet. That is, to the consternation of the oligarchs, the Representatives whom they largely fund and finance to get elected, had dared to listen to their own constituencies for a change on matters of national significance!
That fear has now been astutely mitigated with this calculated assault by Wall Street on the meager savings in 401K and pension plans of whatever remains of middle America! That is surely worth at least 12 new votes in this thin margin of lame-victory. This trap ought to make all of Congress bow their collective heads in abject shame. They have themselves enabled the raping of their own American peoples, with all their enthusiastic trillion-dollar budget approvals and cheerleading for the ‘war on terror’ upon those ‘lesser’ peoples far far away!
The oppressive domestic climate of ‘United we Stand’ and ‘no debate’ due to the pernicious police-state laws, unquestioned ‘orange alerts’, and atrocious Executive Orders which they cheered their President for while handing him carte blanche to wage “imperial mobilization”, has now come home to roost. It enabled the enaction of “Martial Law” in Congress under which this bailout Bill, secretly formulated by “insiders” in the inner sanctums of power, was brought to immediate vote without debate. So what’s the really new ‘news’ here?
It’s the belated discovery that oligarchs are now pulling the strings from behind the scenes – because this string-pulling by the puppetmasters has finally become so egregiously visible and so audacious, that at least some can safely point to it (without being labeled “tin-hatted conspiracy theorists”).
And the admission of the blatant fact that these oligarchs are such powerful globalists investing through a web of global institutional fronts such that they can trivially subvert any national boundary to conduct their financial transactions, and easily prevail upon even the mighty sole superpower’s Congress to instrument their private bailout after ruining the national economy, remarkably, making it on CNBC as breaking news!
This slothful recognition is unsurprising, since Congress didn’t seem to have done its due diligence to the testimony of Maj. General Smedley Butler more than seventy years ago regarding the mighty oligarchs’ fascist plot to visibly take over America. Nor has anyone in Congress, apparently, read the highly decorated soldier’s famous exposé, “War is a Racket”!
Then again, perhaps they have, and it isn’t fashionable to publicly rehearse these facts, or to be specific about the names, as the same oligarchs are behind the very necessary financing of their election campaigns. The contest is between allegiances, between the idealism that shows up in speeches on the House Floor, and pragmatism when it comes to voting. These Faustian pacts is what ails the American Congress – dual allegiances.
Their first “NO” vote followed by this Wall Street ploy, has also afforded these Representatives the opportunity to safely say they are merely following the public’s revised wish when they next vote “YES”, and retain the blessing of the oligarchs. Only a handful need change their vote to swing the decision, and many veneers will be enacted as if it was a great compromise! The new talk is some tax-break for the public – but not to the tune of that received by the oligarchs!
The counter to this remarkable Wall Street move today is not possible, because as both Sigmund Freud and his nephew Edward Bernays had proved, the irrational and emotional response of the mind among the public can be trivially made to prevail over their rational self. There appears to be many a proficient successor to Edward Bernays and his ‘Council on Public Relations’, consulting for the oligarchs today!
The rational thing for Congress to do here would be to allow these banksters to swallow the loss, to allow Wall Street to dip, to put a moratorium on all ordinary public’s default on payments, to instead, award the ordinary American homeowner a bailout, to re-regulate the financial sector and its speculative instruments, to re-think the nation’s debt-trap of money creation, and to create laws and federal statues by which plunderers, looters, and robber barons, instead of being lauded, are hung by the scruff of their neck and their wealth confiscated! The stocks will bounce back to their proper logical levels soon enough. But that rational act, of sanity and courage, requires another more primal, and far more truthful, enabling act to precede it.
In the case of Pakistan, it’s her own ‘Uncle Toms’. That is, all of Pakistan’s leaders!
While many in the United States Congress may entertain genuine dual allegiances, Pakistani leaders, politicians, and military Generals, are rumored to have only one. This is amply demonstrated by the straightforward act of their paying homage to their own puppetmasters with an entire entourage of wannabes the moment they come to power. And this was repeated once again last week where they all took their real oath of office before the President of the United States to solemnly prosecute the ‘war on terror’.
Is there no un co-opted elite left in all of Pakistan and the world who can publicly assert: war on terror is a fiction?
Just that one simple affirmation by statesmen, congressmen, politicians, and serving military Generals, worldwide, at least in Pakistan, is all that is needed. All else will naturally follow.
Yes – the unholy transgression of uttering just this one blasphemous pronouncement by those who matter, by those who command constituencies, is the key Revolutionary Act to unlock all others!
Indeed – a bold and repeated utterance of the only fact of the matter that is also copiously written in America’s own ‘Mein Kampfs’, will enable a genuine, lasting, and the least expensive bailout for all Americans!
Can Congressman Ron Paul lead the way with all his old talk of ‘The Revolution’?
Can Congressman Dennis Kucinich show the way with all his talk of ‘Impeachment’?
Can President Putin come right out and say it in plain English?
Can President Ahmadinijad utter those un-sanctimonious words in the UN instead of all the in-efficacious ones?
Can Presidents, former or not, Mandela and Chavez?
Can Priests, Christians or not, the Pope and the Ayatollah?
Can Fatima Bhutto, the Daughter of Revolutionaries, put some teeth behind her young grit?
Can Imran Khan, the Flag-Bearer of ‘Insaf’, put some plain justice in his fair speak?
It’s truly now or never – with the American public finally listening and less ‘United We Stand’ – and before another shocking terrorist act, or catastrophic event, in America or elsewhere, is blamed upon Pakistan, upon someone else’s fascism, upon Islamofascism, upon negligence, upon patsies, or just on ‘oops’!
What is still practicably possible today, albeit with a bit of effort and a small price, will be well nigh impossible soon.
There will finally be, on planet earth, a real “no exit”!
October 03, 2008
The bailout Bill passed the House in its second vote, as predicted by Project Humanbeingsfirst that it would, just a few moments ago, 263 to 171. President Bush immediately signed it into law on Friday afternoon, asserting:
“By coming together on this legislation, we have acted boldly to prevent the crisis on Wall Street from becoming a crisis in communities across our country,”
CNN Money reported that Rep. Sue Myrick, R-N.C., stated in a statement before the vote:
“We’re on the cusp of a complete catastrophic credit meltdown. There is no liquidity in the market. We are out of time. Either you believe that fact, or you don’t. I do.”
I suppose I do too. This is indeed a genuine crisis. The ordinary American stands to not only lose his shirt and her skirt, but also their comfortable lifestyles, and their meager lifesavings.
But it is also a manufactured crisis. And those pushing this particular bailout solution are the same peoples who deliberately manufactured the crisis. And subsequently, deliberately manipulated and shrunk the money and credit available to the public to substantiate the scare-mongering pressure that was being applied by their “insiders” in Congress.
Thus the same constituencies who had earlier called in to urge a NO vote on the Bill, may very well have called in to urge a YES revised vote. Only data available later will reveal the success of this Edward Bernays style public psyop – whether a majority of Congress persons changed their votes only due to the “insiders’” gun to their head, or whether they also had a face-saving rescue from their constituencies getting scared off by Wall Street action. The banks have sufficient liquidity to lend to each other, but not to the Main Street public in the guise of being wary of bad debt, as noted by CNN Money:
“For the past two weeks, lending between banks and between banks and businesses has gotten considerably more expensive. Small businesses are having trouble getting loans. As of midday Friday, one key measure showed that banks were hoarding cash rather than loaning it. Meanwhile, an indicator showing how willing banks are to lend each other was at an all-time high.”
It wasn’t just happenstance, or simply the capitalist greed gone wild, that precipitated this crisis as many rational contrarians have asserted. It was a creed entirely of a different sort. This addendum to the report “No Exits on this Super-Highway!” explains it.
The fear-mongering that many Congressmen in their House Floor-Speeches had alluded to, including the explicit threat of Martial Law in America noted by Representative Brad Sherman, D-CA, and Martial Law already instituted in Congress to squelch debate and due process as alluded to by Representative Michael Burgess, R-Texas, really cemented the signing of this Bill today.
Under these circumstance, Grand Theft America has been initiated.
Project Humanbeingsfirst wrote a letter to the United States Congress yesterday, on October 02, 2008, suggesting to open a second more powerful front to disarm them. The letter stated:
If at least one of you in your House speeches being televised on C-Span, will assert the falsity of the very basis upon which Martial Law in Congress has been enacted, and due to which, you are being compelled to vote and pass this audacious graft upon the nation in the closing hours of this Presidency, you may have a fighting chance to really be fair to your oath of office.
Assert the plain truth that the “war on terror” is a fiction! That the enemy is fabricated.
And therefore, the emergency and war-footings basis upon which the Martial Law has been declared in the House, is fictitious.
And therefore, you, as the Representative of the People, revolt against this fiction being forced upon you as it is preventing you from upholding your own oath of office to protect and serve the nation against all enemies, both foreign, and domestic!
By astutely challenging, as fraudulent and malfeasant, the very first principle upon which the Congress has been continually co-opted by this Administration in its Constitutional due processes and deliberations, you have the fighting chance of preventing a second vote on this banksters’ bailout Bill in the House.
If this bill is voted upon now in the House, you can take it to the vaults that the bill will pass!
If that second front had been opened by any Congress persons, it would have been tantamount to slaughtering the most sacred holy cow of America in its own highest temple. With media paying rapt attention, it would have surely postponed the voting.
It is Project Humanbeingsfirst’s thesis that the threat to impose Martial Law was merely a bluff, and the uncourageous Congress blinked. It matters not what the tyrants do – for they shall do whatever they will – the good guys are supposed to follow their principles in guiding their own actions regardless, especially when they are even sworn to uphold a national obligation.
Besides, if it was the right time to impose Martial Law in the country, it would have surely been enacted without issuing blackmailing threats. All the preparations for such military policing of America have been in the works for a very long time, with a battle hardened military Brigade even getting ready to patrol the main streets USA starting October 01, 2008, as already reported by the Army Times. The threat of Martial Law has existed since 911 when the US government declared itself on war footings. But it hasn’t been declared yet.
Therefore, the following question logically surfaces. If the eventual goal of the oligarchs is world government (see “The Enduring Capitalist Conspiracy For World Government”), and if the baby-step in that direction is to cement the North American Union and the creation of a new currency called Amero, and the way to reach that stage is through manufactured crises which would demand Martial Law as the only bailout solution, why was it not done during this present crisis when Martial Law was only threatened for passing this bailout Bill? Why not simply enact it in America – the 3rd Infantry Division’s 1st Brigade Combat Team is already at hand.
The answer is really simple – one cannot take the cake out of the oven before it is fully baked.
Or, to whip another cliché into frenzy, one cannot expect the soufflé to rise without beating it to death first!
That is the point – the NAU cannot be cemented so long as the United States, as a powerful entity, still retains scope for independence of action, and its peoples, still feeling empowered, and not fully shackled in the state of hopelessness. For no American, no matter how indoctrinated, will willingly agree to give up their beloved America and form a weird union with Mexico and Canada. Good natured and peaceable people in this country really love their nation like no other peoples on earth. For them, both country and nation mean only one thing, America. And they will fight back in normal times. Therefore, their will to fight has to be eliminated first. The independence, of the peoples, and the state, has to be whittled down, baby-steps at a time, towards complete disillusionment. A condition not dissimilar to the nation’s state in the aftermath of the 1929 crash. Indeed, on the eve of Roosevelt’s inauguration, the banking oligarchs had shut down all the banks in the country to paralyze the new President. Had the New Deal not existed, a fascist state in America – as was transpiring all over Europe – en-route to world government surely might have.
Thus notice, the consolidations that have occurred during the present crisis towards the creation of even greater financial combines than those previously existing, while saddling the nation and its peoples in a new debt-trap that actually has no upper bound. But that is still not sufficient to initiate Martial Law today. The soufflé hasn’t risen sufficiently!
The approval of the $700 Billion bailout package is really the first down payment. This bailout Act, the new law of the land, has deliberate wording which is quite interesting when viewed in the light of an open commitment on the part of Congress to keep adding additional monies to the rescue plan. The bailout expense can rise to trillions of dollars – and that would be the time when the cake is fully baked!
Columnist Ben Stein describes the magnitude of the depths one can potentially fall, in his September 22, 2008 article calling it “the pit of loss is bottomless.” And we haven’t quite reached that pit yet.
Investigative journalist and author Webster Tarpley, in his long missive on “Main Street Lending Facilitys” earlier today, October 03, 2008, called it “a black hole of hundreds of trillions of dollars of poisonous derivatives.”
Tarpley suggests that the total world derivatives are now between:
“$1 QUADRILLION (i.e., one thousand trillion) and $1.5 quadrillion, and Wall Street represents the lion’s share of this … A year ago, JP Morgan Chase alone officially had $93 TRILLION in derivatives of certain types more than six times the total Gross Domestic Product of the United States, and this is a very low-ball estimate indeed.”
I don’t know where these numbers are from, apart from his own admitted guesstimates, but they seem oddly consistent with the notion of “bottomless”. Tarpley goes on to make the qualitative statement based on what had transpired during similar bailout attempts between 1929-1933, before the onset of the New Deal:
“No money that is put into Wall Street [for bailout] will ever pass through it to benefit anyone else. The Wall Street derivatives black hole is so powerful that it could easily eat the whole earth and the entire solar system, and still be just as bankrupt as it was to start with.”
The previous “WMD” mantra was manufactured to decimate the lesser humanity outside the shores of the United States in its external quest for “imperial mobilization”. Yes, they did feel the pain. The other side of the game, the domestic front, also needed a manufactured WMD – and this is what Warren Buffet called it: “Weapons of financial Mass Destruction”.
Yes, Americans shall also feel the pain. Not quite as excruciating, mercifully, as the Iraqis, the Palestinians, the Lebanese, the Afghanis, or as the Pakistanis are beginning to feel now – all for the pleasure of inducing the “Birth-pangs of a New Middle East”. This pain has meant very little to the “United we stand” clueless up until now. And the key question to ask is, why make these clueless suffer? Didn’t they dutifully salute the flag?
And if America is out to dominate the world in its quest for “full spectrum dominance”, why destroy its own infrastructures such that its own civil engineers would give its state of disrepair a D grade? Doesn’t Brzezinski’s “The Grand Chessboard” explain it all as:
“perpetuat[ing] America’s own dominant position for at least a generation and preferably longer” such that “no Eurasian challenger emerges, capable of dominating Eurasia and thus also challenging America”?
I suppose serious peoples would also have to read Brzezinski’s 1970 classic “Between Two Ages” in order to comprehend the real hidden agenda driving America’s “imperial mobilization” which remains un-articulated in ‘the Grand Chessboard’ and in PNAC’s policy advocacy for American militarism. These are not end-goals, these are camouflaged baby-steps.
The real principle is that which led bankster David Rockefeller – the self-avowed globalist whose family funded the founding of the United Nations building in New York, and who supports and finances the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) which is now advocating the North American Union – to create the Trilateral Commission, and install Zbigniew Brzezinski as its first Executive Director, after supposedly reading Brzezinski’s book!
The sole superpower’s might is being harnessed to usher in the systematic baby-steps to world government by America’s blood-sucking hijackers: the financial oligarchs who have ruled America from behind the scenes for the past hundred years. Indeed, some argue that their brethren across the Atlantic rule all the European democracies, and especially the G-7 nations (Russia mercifully finally escaped from their clutches under Vladimir Putin).
The hand of Rockefeller and other globalist banksters is not only behind the CFR – the private foreign policy planning arm of the United States Government – but also his banks largely dominate the New York Fed. The Federal Reserve System, also simply called the Fed, is the privatized money supply arm of the United States Government, controlled by 12 of the largest private banks in the United States. There is as much federal about the Fed as Fedx.
Thus, note that both United States policy, and United States money, have the same oligarchs controlling them! What a remarkable realization of Rothschild’s statement:
“give me control of a nation’s money supply, and I care not who makes its laws”
And what an ominously prescient statement of both James Madison and Thomas Jefferson:
“History records that the Money Changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and its issuance.” (Madison)
“I sincerely believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Already they have raised up a money aristocracy that has set the government at defiance. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people to whom it properly belongs.” (Jefferson)
The creation of the Fed was the most brilliant success of the oligarchs in their hijacking of America. They orchestrated the approval for its creation by Congress in 1913 under dubious circumstances at best. In reality, it was an outright subversion of due process. That one single Act of Congress in 1913, enabled the subsequent conquest of America by these bankster oligarchs. G. Edward Griffin’s book “The Creature from Jekyll Island” details it all most thoroughly. And Professor Carroll Quigley’s book “Tragedy and Hope” describes the rest of America’s hijacking based on his full access to insider documents. The interested reader is directed to these seminal works for more in depth study. Those un-attuned to scholarly readings may find Paul Grignon’s “Money as Debt”, a fast-paced 47-minute animated video tutorial, of invaluable assistance in learning about money and the Fed in less time than watching two episodes of Friends. This remarkable tutorial for all ages, is also available on google but please purchase the dvd to support its incredible creator. And for those still skeptical of CFR’s grooming role in America’s statesmen who subsequently enact its policies, see the confessional 1958 article in Harper magazine for an introduction to CFR written by one of its own members, titled: “School for Statesmen”.
Suffice it to assert here in conclusion of this summary background on the role of common oligarchic threads behind America’s present financial as well as its foreign policy crises which has deliberately orchestrated its spiraling debt, that the behind the scenes control and manipulation of State destinies is not mere theory, philosophy, or false bravados. It is neither mere happenstance, nor vacuous greed for more money, nor blowback. It is the pursuit of the singular common vision already explained in “The Enduring Capitalist Conspiracy For World Government”. Even the famous and much revered British historian, Arnold Toynbee, who along with Lord Alfred Milner had founded the “Round Tables” in the early years of the twentieth century which had subsequently led to the founding of the CFR in the United States, and the RIIA in the UK, asserted it. In a speech before the Institute for the Study of International Affairs at Copenhagen, he stated:
“We are at present working discreetly with all our might to wrest this mysterious force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local nation states of the world. All the time we are denying with our lips what we are doing with our hands, because to impugn the sovereignty of the local nation states of the world is still a heresy for which a statesman or publicist can perhaps not quite be burned at the stake but certainly be ostracized or discredited.” [Arnold Toynbee, “The Trend of International Affairs Since the War”, International Affairs, November 1931, p. 809.]
And today, his equally earnest legatees influencing both the CFR and the Fed, state the same thing:
“We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.” [David Rockefeller – cited in “Quotation on Terrorism”, page 298]
And this friendly Fed is the same private entity that is now working in cahoots with the U.S. Government’s Treasury Department to manage this crisis. Between the two, they orchestrated this bailout by forcibly prevailing upon Congress once again.
Well, one might ask, isn’t the Treasury Secretary independent? How can the Fed influence them? Yes, the Treasury Secretary is indeed very powerful, and quite independent. But only in so far as his role within the United State’s Government is concerned. The Secretary works for the same oligarchic interests in an incredible revolving door between the finance sector and the U.S. Government. Even a passing glance at Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson’s resume, i.e., work history, makes that obvious.
The NAU is inevitable. It is the CFR’s orchestration, and the globalist oligarchs wet dreams. The conditions for it are being rapidly created. And this bailout which further puts the United States in a position to default on its currency, to default on its trillions of dollars in debt servicing to other nations, is the set up.
This crisis, a baby-step in that direction, has been deliberately manufactured by the Bush Administration in collusion with Wall Street, for precisely the outcome which transpired today.
Here is some evidence for it.
Former NY Governor Eliot Sptizer revealed it in his Washington Post article of February 14, 2008, titled “Predatory Lenders’ Partner in Crime – How the Bush Administration Stopped the States From Stepping In to Help Consumers”, and because of which, he was dethroned with a scandal. He had warned of almost 8 months ago:
“When history tells the story of the subprime lending crisis and recounts its devastating effects on the lives of so many innocent homeowners, the Bush administration will not be judged favorably. The tale is still unfolding, but when the dust settles, it will be judged as a willing accomplice to the lenders who went to any lengths in their quest for profits. So willing, in fact, that it used the power of the federal government in an unprecedented assault on state legislatures, as well as on state attorneys general and anyone else on the side of consumers.”
Greg Palast followed up a month later in his article of March 14, 2008, titled “Eliot’s Mess The $200 billion bail-out for predator banks and Spitzer charges are intimately linked”, adding an epilogue to Eliot’s afore-stated comment. After observing how Spitzer hath fallen in a $4300 a night ‘escort’ sting operation, Palast prematurely wrote how history had been spared in its judgment of Bush Administration:
“But now, the Administration can rest assured that this love story – of Bush and his bankers – will not be told by history at all – now that the Sheriff of Wall Street has fallen on his own gun.”
Author of Grand Theft America, Steve Lendman, summed it up to this author in an email communication “absolutely this crisis was manufactured. Problem is they created a monster that may end up devouring its creator”.
This is where I might mildly disagree with Lendman. The monster is in “fuzzy” chains, and only allowed measured extension on its probabilistic forays. At the right moment, it will be killed off to create the Amero, setting the stage for further financial upheaval in resource rich Asia left holding America’s debt in “confederate currency”. This will create conditions quite congenial with just the right sprinkling of militarism and nuclear warfare, for eventually bringing about the third union in the world government agenda. Globalism does not deal in certainties, only in probabilities, loading the dice as needed to favor the outcomes of interest. These are calculated shenanigans. The size of the problem, deliberately a mushroom cloud, like any hydrogen bomb’s.
I hope Lendman is wrong. I further hope that the oligarchs have miscalculated. That humanity is far greater in its resilience to fight back tyranny than what they give us credit for. Even George Orwell could not but help allow a faint smile to appear on the weathered face of the last common man on earth in “1984”. Surely a Patrick Henry is just around the corner!
While unbridled hope is perhaps the wishful thinking that leads to voluntary servitude, critical analysis is not.
All that is analyzed by Project Humanbeingsfirst, isn’t peering into the Cassandra’s crystal ball, or into the vibrant but immanent space of an armchair philosopher’s fertile imagination.
It is political science writ large in the masterminds’ own hand-writings and empirical deeds, and in the connection between disparate past events and the new emerging ones piece-meal.
And all paths rationally lead to the stated goal of world government. Some might however, still prefer to label the obvious, ‘tin-hatted conspiracy theories‘.
Project Humanbeingsfirst prefers to call the detective process of uncovering the secrets of “hegemony”, forensic science. And what is uncovered, political science – an art which is “as old as mankind.” It was succinctly described by James Jesus Angleton, the head of CIA Counter Intelligence operations from 1954 to 1974, as: “Deception is the state of mind, and the mind of the State.”
This Machiavellian rendition of political science as applied to state-craft, was so timelessly captured by G. Edward Griffin four decades ago, that it behooves upon an honest analyst to rehearse it repeatedly in order to remind the dumb-ass spectating world unable to recognize it while all of us sink deeper and deeper into the clutches of its enslavement, that, that’s just the way unchecked power behaves!
“Create conditions so frightful at home and abroad, that the abandonment of personal liberties and national sovereignty, will appear as a reasonable price for a return to domestic tranquility and world peace.
… If those who seek world dominion can stimulate [terror threats, 911, new 911], and also provide exhaustive news coverage, so that the entire nation can see and tremble, then the peaceful and freedom loving majority can be programmed to accept a vast expansion of government powers, and even a national police force, offered supposedly to end the violence.
… If those who seek world dominion can raise the spectre of an enemy, [or economic condition], armed to the teeth with superior atomic weapons on the verge of launching a nuclear holocaust [radical Islamists], and also offer world-government as the prevention, then millions of Americans can be programmed to accept the loss of national sovereignty, as our last best hope for peace.” ( Words of G. Edward Griffin circa 1971-72 )
In conclusion, if FDR’s New Deal had worked then, it is not entirely obvious why it should not work again.  
It is even less obvious why the courageous members of the United States Congress did not unite along bipartisan lines in the best interest of their beloved nation, to construct a New Deal as their counter group proposal. And instead, willingly chose to show their cowardice before the tyranny of the few. If the tyrants threaten Martial Law – let them follow through, for it would be forcing their hand prematurely towards something they plan on doing anyway. A soufflé before it has risen is worthless!
Thanks for reading. If this essay was useful, please write your Congress person to not fear tyranny – that you are with them. Six feet under, the maggots can’t tell the difference anyway!
 December 04, 2008. After that sentence was written, which was based on the populist understanding of what FDR had supposedly accomplished in the New Deal, through actual research into the facts of the matter however, it has now become blatantly apparent why it would not work again. FDR at the time had capitulated to the banksters – some say he was in fact the banksters own very clever pointman – and changed America’s money which was previously redeemable in gold, into fiat paper money, with the passing of The Emergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933. All the gold of the American peoples was confiscated, and in effect, handed over to the Federal Reserve System in lieu of an infinite supply of paper money constructed as a national debt. The principal of this national debt was never intended to be ever paid back – it was setup as an infinite inflationary supply source. However, the interest on it was to accrue exponentially – compound-interest – and this interest was payable by the American peoples, the consumers, the corporations, and all economic activity in the United States.
In addition, making the US dollar world’s reserve currency at Bretton-Woods by the victor of World War II, made increasing that principal a global impetus from the entire world’s economic activity. Every US Treasury Security held by the oil producing nations courtesy of Henry Kissinger, every dollar held in foreign exchange reserves by the world’s nations, indeed every dollar in circulation, contributed to this principal! Every dollar added to the principal that was beyond the growth of the American nation’s real GDP – based on real production and not financial wizardry – was inflationary. Thus all economic activity due to debt financing, as opposed to balanced budget financing, was by design, made inflationary.
The word “inflationary” means when a dollar purchases less than it did before, or the same thing costs more than it did before. However it’s official measurement also has become a con-game, and therefore, that word here is used to mean the real empirical experience of real wage-earning consumers who are the most susceptible to inflation (and who, incidentally, also pay the bulk of the interest on the national debt through their federal income tax), and not official reportage based on some artificial basket of goods. More the American worker made, more he paid out in taxes and in rising cost of living, so that he and she ended up with less and less in working families with even both parents working! Thus American public took on more and more debt, sometimes to make ends meet, and sometimes to enjoy the good times that were easily handed them on the platter of inextricable debt. And so the monster of debt fed itself. This wasn’t just a side-effect as almost all the economists and politicians would have the ill-informed public believe, but by the very design of the monetary system under the Federal Reserve System.
That was quite a brilliant coup d’état under the guise of solving the problem of the Great Depression by the banksters! The same banksters funded the causes, and all participants, of World War II, just as they precipitated the Great Depression itself. It was a banksters’ World War, and a banksters’ Great Depression! And a banksters’ currency that kept creating more and more debt by design. Their ‘small’ calculated baby-step to create world government led to more millions dead and disillusioned than all wars of all history added together. Just as it is re-playing out the same game today, but much closer to endgame. Since the year 1933 was only the beginning of the paper money scam – this incarnation of the central bankers’ perpetual scam since time immemorial, actually began in 1910 at Jekyll Island, and got cemented with the passage of the Federal Reserve Act on December 23, 1913 – the cumulative national debt then was low, the interest payments were low, and the Frankenstein was just a cute baby boy.
Therefore, President Roosevelt could trivially embark on his debt-financed spending spree which became known as the New Deal. See the debt-chart from 1900 to 2006 in the book by Van K Tharp here, and current national debt numbers proudly reported by the U.S. Treasury here. Today, such a spending spree is not possible in the existing monetary system because the Frankenstein of debt has now matured into an ugly monster about to devour its feeders. And yet, such a spending spree is still generously being granted to the banksters to the tune of $7.7 Trillion for bailout, as reported by Bloomberg on November 24, 2008! The New York Times further broke this number down in its report of November 25, 2008 – loans $1.7 trillion, Investments $3.0 trillion, Guarantees $3.1 trillion – noting “they would print as much money as needed to revive the nation’s crippled banking system … some investments may prove profitable … The Treasury secretary, Henry M. Paulson Jr., made it clear that the new lending facility was just a “starting point” and could be expanded to many other kinds of debt,”
To appreciate how the sheep are craftily being primed for the slaughter, see George J. W. Goodman’s essay ‘The German Hyperinflation, 1923‘ for historical context. Apart from the astronomical unpayable debt deliberately being run up, the hyper-inflationary direction where the Treasury secretary is steering the nation and the world with this ‘solution’ to the manufactured financial crisis, is in plain sight. This was a brilliantly orchestrated design, because the cure for this now fully grown grotesque Frankenstein – in order that it not devour its own creators – is being presented as a common global monetary system run by private central banks, owned by the very same banksters! And by making the dollar worthless – when a wheelbarrow full of dollars will barely purchase a loaf of bread – the ‘United We Stand’ from ‘sea to shinning sea’ patriotic masses will willingly accept a new currency, a new union, a new world order! A crafty and audacious planning of a hundred years expertly being brought to fruition! Please see the Monetary Reform Bibliography, and Monetary Conspiracy for World Government.
The unfortunate populist version of FDR’s New Deal is deeply entrenched in American society – like all its other indoctrinations – and it is even more exacerbated by polished disinformation documentaries like “1932” (see LaRouche: A nuanced and expert Disinformationist or merely Uber Alles? ). And the whole shebang of the Federal Reserve System is very cleverly camouflaged, and confounded, by its learned exponents and detractors alike (see Monetary Reform: Who will bell the cat? and also Chapter 6 of Ron Paul’s book: Revolution; caveat lector on Ron Paul here!).
“We are going to go into a depression worse than the Great Depression, and here is why. There is a way to get out of this but not through fiscal or monetary stimulus. If we have an alternative energy break-through, beyond solar ….. that’s as big as the discovery of fire or the invention of the wheel then we get out of this economic mess. Minus that, we are going to go into the greatest depression, and here is why:
1. Back when we had the last depression, most people didn’t own homes, they didn’t have all this burden that’re carrying now, with taxes and everything else, insurance.
2. Back then, people didn’t have home equity loans. Matter of fact, you know we are probably both old enough to know when people had something called second mortgages, they were called losers.
3. Back then, people didn’t have credit cards. They weren’t over 14 trillion dollars in debt.
4. Back then, the government had a trade surplus. We were not 700 billion dollars in the hole. And the people were self-sufficient.
5. Back then, the government was not spending 11.5 trillion in growing in the hole with a budget deficit.
6. Back then, we had budget surpluses.
7. Back then, we weren’t costing us over 2 trillion dollars to fight wars.
8. Back then, we had a manufacturing base, that when the depression did end with the onset of WW II, we were able to manufacture ourselves out of it, and then later on the rest of the world.
9. Back then, people didn’t have 401Ks and IRAs that were their future, evaporating right before them.
And the other thing people need to know was during the Depression, you could do some of these work-project things that they talk about. We didn’t have these deficits that we have now. So to keep talking about stimulus packages, to keep talking about work-project packages, where is this money going to come from? And again, as every historian or economist knows, the only thing that got us out of that Depression, was WW II.” ( Gerald Celente, Trends Research, November 17, 2008, Alex Jones Show )
Press Release WHAT’S TO BE DONE – Massive Bomb Blast in Islamabad Marriott
September 20, 2008
[September 22, 2008] The mainstream newsmedia worldwide is awash with the multitude of descriptions, speculations, videos, and eye-witness accounts of the attack in Islamabad on the Marriott Hotel on September 20, 2008. The fires are still smoldering, the destruction of the massive 5-star hotel is complete, and the confirmed loss of life is at least 60, largely among the ordinary lower-staff and chauffeurs who served at the outer perimeter of the heavily guarded hotel, with hundreds more injured. Some have called this shocking atrocity in Islamabad, the “9/11 of Pakistan”, with the same ‘jihadi’ patsies dutifully lined up by the newsmedia, the pundits, and the governments worldwide, to take the fall!
This press release by Project Humanbeingsfirst is urgently issued with a counter plea to the Pakistani peoples and to the World: For heavens’ sake, stop blaming India’s RAW, Jihadis’ Taliban and Al-Qaeeda, etc., as the prime-movers of this new atrocity upon the Pakistani peoples. Misdiagnosing a systemic disease is a sure protocol for never finding its cure!
The destabilization of Pakistan has needed a confluence of patsies and mercenaries. A patsy or dupe is one who strongly believes in what he/she is doing, but is deftly controlled by puppetmasters. A mercenary is one who sells his/her allegiance to the highest bidder at any moment in time. The suicide bombers and cultivated “jihadis” of the likes that Pakistan has never seen in its entire history before, are patsies. The Pakistani ruling-elite are the mercenaries. Between the two, Black-ops and aid dollars have been well spent in Pakistan!
And this time, in the new imperialists’ euphemistically labeled war, the “War on Terror”, we are now killing our own citizenry with our full military might in such an unremarkable and brutish manner that it is only guaranteed to create further ill-will and resentment among the already disgruntled and disenfranchised ordinary peoples. Thus, more resistance, more radicalism, more innocent dead, more fertile ground for cultivating suicide bombers, more complaints of “islamofascism” to scare the Western public with. So that in the end, in the mother of all battles between “good” and “evil” in which “either you are with us or with the terrorists”, there will be a continuous fresh supply of recruits to wage the requisite “endless wars” against.
It is only to prolong the conflagration for a full “lifetime of wars” lasting a “generation” – the “World War IV” – in the profound imperialist hope that, the resulting eventual maelstroms of radicalism seeded in ‘jihad’, will engulf the entire ‘arc of crises’, enabling its radical retransformation once again to suit the new imperial interests of the new “hectoring hegemons”.
If one wasn’t living in Alice’s dream world where the most absurd becomes a life–like reality and the ‘unbirthday party’ a cause célèbre, one would bluntly suggest that this looks very much like a devilishly premeditated synthesis of terror – ‘synthetic terror’ – in order to create an enemy to fight against “for at least a generation and preferably longer”, because in the absence “of a sudden threat or challenge to the public’s sense of domestic well-being”, and “except in the circumstance of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat”, the much touted American “democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization”!
That is all the reality there is to this new spate of terror in my city in Pakistan – a further excuse for more premeditated, pre-planned, devilishly orchestrated American Intervention in Pakistan until they take over the entire Tribal Belt in order to be in closer proximity to China, and break-off Baluchistan as a new independent neo-liberal ‘Gulf State’. The dismemberment and de-nuking of Pakistan is the larger agenda; and Mr. Zardari – like his distinguished predecessor – is the new ‘decider’ of that agenda.
And “tickling” the terrorists into existence, as CIA Director Michael Hayden observed of CIA’s modus operandi: “We use military operations to excite the enemy, prompting him to respond. In that response we learn so much,” is the preferred choice for running this false-flag operation on Pakistan. When the victims and their survivors are thus sufficiently mentally “tickled” with the loss of their loved ones under the world’s mightiest superpower’s barbaric “shock and awe”, and expertly already doctrinally primed with the long-running “god is on your side” jihad to seed the anticipated response, the patsies are cleverly armed and guided through Pentagon’s Black-ops local handlers’ hierarchy, to their targets. Sometimes, even running complex false-flag operations this way by setting up diversionary visible patsies, while the often precision oriented and far more catastrophic terrorist act is directly and covertly controlled.
This is the well known modus operandi to ab initio create terrorist acts. Once created, the many organs of State, the military, the police, the intelligentsia, the media, the pundits, all naturally focus on the patsies and the victims! Because that is all they see before their un-forensic co-opted eyes.
And the Americans send in their military advisors to take-on the menace of these militants before these “jihadis” can take over Pakistan’s nuclear weapons and threaten the entire world! This is how the Americans got into Vietnam too! It begins with pretexts to send in military advisors, with willing complicity of the mercenary rulers already deftly foisted upon the nation for that very purpose – to extend the invitation or cooperation as ‘lesser of two evils’! Our picturesque Tribal Belt has already become Vietnam for its victims under this imperial paradigm!
Thus, the ‘Al-Qaeeda‘ abstraction works great, as any shocking terrorist act attributed to them, or ‘claimed’ by them, enables multiple goals of the hectoring hegemons – from providing a pretext to invade-strangulate other nations, to scaring their own peoples into supporting the slaughter of other ‘lesser’ humanity, to clamping down on any domestic dissent with Police-State powers such as H.R. 1955, the Patriot Acts, and various Executive Orders. As was explained in Project Humanbeingsfirst’s April 2008 report “The attack of ‘Al-Qaeeda’ and Pakistani ‘loose nukes’”:
This time around, it’s destination Tehran via Islamabad. And quite un-cleverly disguised as “’defensive US military action”. But at the ‘unbirthday’ party, everything absurd becomes reality!
The Pakistani ‘loose nukes’ hijacked by the cave-dwelling, stick-wielding, suicide-bombing, ‘Al-Qaeeda’ mantra is among the multiple facile absurdities being deftly primed (and black-ops synthesized) as already outlined in the afore-stated wakeup call. It is one thing for the press and politicians in the pockets of the ‘Hectoring Hegemons’ (PNAC) to be rehearsing this silly as part of their “intellectual commitment” to seeding “doctrinal motivation” for the ‘retaliatory’ “patriotic gratification” (Brzezinski). It is quite another for the victims themselves to be bizarrely echoing it. This is yet to be observed in primal nature: lambs arguing for their own slaughter.
Why do our media-pundits/columnists/so-called-scholars, never mind the leaders, refuse to publicly acknowledge these blatant facts is beyond ordinary comprehension, when surely, all of them in the privacy of their own homes, will concur with that diagnosis.
And not all of them are mercenaries or patsies – what co-opts them into this rehearsing of the asinine “unbirthday party” song of ‘war on terror’ that only leads them to RAW, Taliban, Al-Qaeeda, “Between Imperialism and Islamism”, and every place else on earth, except to the greatest ‘benefactor’ of Pakistan since its inception as a ‘client-state’?
Why is Pakistan a part of this pernicious absurdity? What’s in it for our 200 million peoples who don’t even have clean drinking water for heavens’ sake?
Would the new President of Pakistan have the courage to renounce his earlier stance now that he is in power – as he had also unabashedly stated that “there was nothing final in politics and positions could change with the changing situations”:
‘The Pakistan People’s Party (PPP), if it comes into power, must persuade the people that the fight against militants is “our war”, not just America’s war’?
The only practicable solution for saving Pakistan begins with ‘calling a spade a spade’, followed by urgently disengaging from the fiction of “war on terror” and seeking military-economic full-spectrum alliances with SCO, especially IRAN. The fates of the two beleaguered nations are joined at the hip like Siamese twins! The President of both nations are to be coincidentally present in New York at the same time. Yet look for how differently they each will behave!
DISENGAGE DISENGAGE DISENGAGE, before it is too late!
Please see the following Project Humanbeingsfirst reports which explain this absurdity of ‘Alice in Wonderland’ that has been so devilishly crafted to suicide Pakistan, with the voluntary participation of Pakistan’s own mercenaries and patsies:
And in order for ‘genius’ minds un-attuned to fiction to forensically comprehend how this atrocity in Pakistan is being covered in the global news media, including Pakistan’s by its own ‘native informants’, please take a look at how a similar atrocity in Iran was covered earlier this year in April 2008, when a bomb ripped through a mosque in Shiraz:
A humble public service message of legitimate and empowering self-defense brought to a beleaguered peoples by Project HumanbeingsfirstTM.org.
contact person: Zahir Ebrahim
Happy-Happy Zardari: A monologue on Hope and Voluntary Servitude
September 10, 2008
In response to a felicitous greeting received from my good old college professor in Pakistan, I wrote back:
Best wishes for you and your family too in this month of blessings [Ramadan] – the election of such a distinguished president must also be a source of tremendous joy all around – “happy-happy!”
And then, almost as an after thought, I composed the following monologue in the postscript to further elaborate upon my cryptic use of “happy-happy”! I had borrowed that phrase from another close friend in Pakistan whom I had called right after Mr. Zardari’s election, and upon asking him how he felt, he had sardonically replied: “happy-happy”! That phrase captures and hides a wellspring of emotion and resignation to fate for an average Pakistani, and after I had written the phrase down, I felt I had to intellectualize it in order to lend a bit greater comprehension to the human condition which trivially seems to cause silent acceptance, or acquiescence, to that hope filled state. In fact, I have always found the similarities between the Pakistani and the American public to be rather striking in the state of their voluntary servitude, despite their vast disparity in affluence, life-style, and “modernity”. So I expounded upon my humble take on my friend’s “happy-happy” to my respected professor – and all as a postscript, for indeed, ironically, intellectualizing any human condition is but a mere postscript in its impact on ameliorating it. The history of mankind is evidence of this truism.
Is man even worse-off than even the lowly animal born free, in the best of circumstance? Wherefore the “Ashraf-ul-Makhluqat” [the best of creation – an attribution by the Qur’an to man]? I see scant evidence of this lofty Islamic theory in practice. As a scientist, theories are only as good as their ability to explain the empirical evidence – right?
Please see this book written by a 22 year old in 16th century France (1552 AD) named Etienne de La Boétie if you have the time: “The Politics of Obedience: The Discourse of Voluntary Servitude”. You can find its translation in English on the Mises Institute website . It’s only 81 pages long and can be read in one afternoon. Here is an extended excerpt from the introduction [not written by its author], and the one main concluding observation reached by the young author in his own words:
The Discourse of Voluntary Servitude is lucidly and coherently structured around a single axiom, a single percipient insight into the nature not only of tyranny, but implicitly of the State apparatus itself. Many medieval writers had attacked tyranny, but La Boétie delves especially deeply into its nature, and into the nature of State rule itself. This fundamental insight was that every tyranny must necessarily be grounded upon general popular acceptance. In short, the bulk of the people themselves, for whatever reason, acquiesce in their own subjection. If this were not the case, no tyranny, indeed no governmental rule, could long endure. Hence, a government does not have to be popularly elected to enjoy general public support; for general public support is in the very nature of all governments that endure, including the most oppressive of tyrannies. The tyrant is but one person, and could scarcely command the obedience of another person, much less of an entire country, if most of the subjects did not grant their obedience by their own consent.
This, then, becomes for La Boétie the central problem of political theory: why in the world do people consent to their own enslavement? La Boétie cuts to the heart of what is, or rather should be, the central problem of political philosophy: the mystery of civil obedience. Why do people, in all times and places, obey the commands of the government, which always constitutes a small minority of the society? To La Boétie the spectacle of general consent to despotism is puzzling and appalling:
“I should like merely to understand how it happens that so many men, so many villages, so many cities, so many nations, sometimes suffer under a single tyrant who has no other power than the power they give him; who is able to harm them only to the extent to which they have the willingness to bear with him; who could do them absolutely no injury unless they preferred to put up with him rather than contradict him. Surely a striking situation! Yet it is so common that one must grieve the more and wonder the less at the spectacle of a million men serving in wretchedness, their necks under the yoke, not constrained by a greater multitude than they…”
And this mass submission must be out of consent rather than simply out of fear:
“Shall we call subjection to such a leader cowardice? … If a hundred, if a thousand endure the caprice of a single man, should we not rather say that they lack not the courage but the desire to rise against him, and that such an attitude indicates indifference rather than cowardice? When not a hundred, not a thousand men, but a hundred provinces, a thousand cities, a million men, refuse to assail a single man from whom the kindest treatment received is the infliction of serfdom and slavery, what shall we call that? Is it cowardice? … When a thousand, a million men, a thousand cities, fail to protect themselves against the domination of one man, this cannot be called cowardly, for cowardice does not sink to such a depth. . . . What monstrous vice, then, is this which does not even deserve to be called cowardice, a vice for which no term can be found vile enough . . . ?”
It is evident from the above passages that La Boétie is bitterly opposed to tyranny and to the public’s consent to its own subjection. He makes clear also that this opposition is grounded on a theory of natural law and a natural right to liberty. In childhood, presumably because the rational faculties are not yet developed, we obey our parents; but when grown, we should follow our own reason, as free individuals. As La Boétie puts it: “If we led our lives according to the ways intended by nature and the lessons taught by her, we should be intuitively obedient to our parents; later we should adopt reason as our guide and become slaves to nobody.” Reason is our guide to the facts and laws of nature and to humanity’s proper path, and each of us has “in our souls some native seed of reason, which, if nourished by good counsel and training, flowers into virtue, but which, on the other hand, if unable to resist the vices surrounding it, is stifled and blighted.” And reason, La Boétie adds, teaches us the justice of equal liberty for all. For reason shows us that nature has, among other things, granted us the common gift of voice and speech. Therefore, “there can be no further doubt that we are all naturally free,” and hence it cannot be asserted that “nature has placed some of us in slavery.” Even animals, he points out, display a natural instinct to be free. But then, what in the world “has so, denatured man that he, the only creature really born to be free, lacks the memory of his original condition and the desire to return to it?”
La Boétie’s celebrated and creatively original call for civil disobedience, for mass non-violent resistance as a method for the overthrow of tyranny, stems directly from the above two premises: the fact that all rule rests on the consent of the subject masses, and the great value of natural liberty. For if tyranny really rests on mass consent, then the obvious means for its overthrow is simply by mass withdrawal of that consent. The weight of tyranny would quickly and suddenly collapse under such a non-violent revolution.
Thus, after concluding that all tyranny rests on popular consent, La Boétie eloquently concludes that “obviously there is no need of fighting to overcome this single tyrant, for he is automatically defeated if the country refuses consent to its own enslavement.” Tyrants need not be expropriated by force; they need only be deprived of the public’s continuing supply of funds and resources. The more one yields to tyrants, La Boétie points out, the stronger and mightier they become. But if the tyrants “are simply not obeyed,” they become “undone and as nothing.” La Boétie then exhorts the “poor, wretched, and stupid peoples” to cast off their chains by refusing to supply the tyrant any further with the instruments of their own oppression. The tyrant, indeed, has nothing more than the power that you confer upon him to destroy you. Where has he acquired enough eyes to spy upon you, if you do not provide them yourselves? How can he have so many arms to beat you with, if he does not borrow them from you? The feet that trample down your cities, where does he get them if they are not your own? How does he have any power over you except through you? How would he dare assail you if he had not cooperation from you?
La Boétie concludes his exhortation by assuring the masses that to overthrow the tyrant they need not act, nor shed their blood. They can do so “merely by willing to be free.” In short,
“Resolve to serve no more, and you are at once freed. I do not ask that you place hands upon the tyrant to topple him over, but simply that you support him no longer; then you will behold him, like a great Colossus whose pedestal has been pulled away, fall of his own weight and break in pieces.”
— End Excerpt
And to comprehend how La Boétie’s insight has been cleverly employed to checkmate the common man in the West by the same tyrant and his exponents, who in these times, conveniently install the despot as the front-face of a secretive oligarchy, see “Weapons of Mass Deception – the Master Social Science” . It is the profound lack of understanding of this latter discourse that today enables “Voluntary Servitude” in the affluent West. No amount of rehearsing Boétie’s commonsensical platitudes, the profound Ten Commandments, or even the Biblical Golden Rule “Do unto others as you have others do unto you”, is going to empower Plato’s “Prisoners of the Cave” . For indeed, “none are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.” Only astute political science can effectively counter devilish political science! See for instance “How to derail ‘imperial mobilization’ and preempt the crossing of the Nuclear Rubicon” .
But what about the “Voluntary Servitude” in the East and the Global South that is egregiously loaded with almost 3/4th of all the natural resources of the planet and is yet also home to 3/4th of the world’s poverty stricken humanity? Surely the hungry man unable to feed his family knows the price of “cake” quite well? And yet, he continues to persist in enabling his own servitude? What prevents La Boétie’s prescription today when the same principle exemplarily brought down the majesty of the British Empire in its own Jewel in the Crown less than four score years past?
The answer must remain the same as during La Boétie’s time – the threshold of the masses’ tolerance hasn’t been crossed yet – the poor among mankind having been endowed with infinite patience and eternal hope! It is this “hope”, and man’s misplaced optimism due to it, that primarily enables one’s “Voluntary Servitude”. Therefore, despite the simple mechanism of overthrowing it – albeit only collectively – being quite naturally available to man as rationally demonstrated by Boétie, “hope” perniciously incapacitates him.
The omission of this empirical observation of eternal “hope” in man – also a key to his survival by averting despondency during misfortunes – in La Boétie’s political discourse can perhaps be attributed to the author’s youthful inexperience at the time when he composed his remarkably astute treatise, and for which, he may surely be forgiven! Perhaps this is why Boétie did not publish the discourse as he may have intuitively felt its incompleteness (although some others have offered more exoteric reasons for it such as concern for his own personal safety from the tyrants of the day).
As with the surfeit of anything, man’s natural affinity towards “hope” becomes his enduring anchor into his own long-term “Voluntary Servitude”. It is a natural “opiate” that apparently only exists in humankind. It is far more universal in its sedative effect than any imagined by Karl Marx when he mistakenly blamed man’s tolerance for his own exploitation, upon his obsession with “religion”! Far transcending the realm of social inculcation, but often exploited by it, “hope” appears to be innate in every individual human being!
Lest one might be mistaken that this opiate is only for the backward humanity of the Global South, the miserable poor in the religion and spirituality imbued East that is perennially “waiting for Allah” or “Karma”, the recent statistics for the United States, the exemplar of advanced civilization out to teach the rest of the world how to live, exposes that misconception :
A recent survey of this group by the Washington Post, the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation and Harvard University conducted this past June looked at the beliefs of adults ages 18 to 64 working 30 or more hours a week, not self-employed and who earned no more than $27,000 in 2007. The results show a fascinating dichotomy. Though there is widespread pain and discontent there is also a stubborn faith in the American dream despite little help from government.
Ninety percent of this group sees the current economy negatively, either not so good or poor, with 52 percent feeling financially insecure and 50 percent feeling less secure than a few years ago. The fractions saying they have difficulty affording basic things are severe, including: 88 percent that cannot save money for college or other education for their children, 82 percent paying for gasoline or other transportation costs, 81 percent saving money for retirement, 65 percent paying for health care and health insurance, 65 percent handling child care, close to 60 percent paying credit card bills, monthly utility bills and rent or mortgage costs, and 47 percent buying food. Three quarters say it has gotten harder to find good jobs and nearly that fraction for finding affordable health care, and 68 percent finding decent, affordable housing.
In the past year this group has had to take many actions to make ends meet, including 70 percent that cut electricity use and home heating; 62 percent that took an extra job or worked extra hours, 51 percent that postponed medical or dental care and 50 percent that took money out of savings or retirement funds.
All this sounds pretty bleak. But are these people mad and pessimistic? Not exactly.
An amazing 69 percent are hopeful about their personal financial situation, 59 percent believe they are more likely over the next few years to move up in terms of their social class, 59 percent believe that their children will have a standard of living much or somewhat better than theirs, and 56 percent think they will achieve the American dream in their lifetime.
[…] The unmistakable conclusion from all these data is that no rebellion against the power elites running the two-party plutocracy seems likely. If the bottom 40 percent of Americans in terms of income still believe in the American dream and change-spouting politicians like Obama, it is hard to believe that the more affluent middle 40 percent of the population are ready to support more radical change through political rebellion.
[…] Forget all that nonsense about the proletariat. Most Americans use their faith in God or religion or conventional politicians to cope, even in some of the most insecure economic times in American history. They remain overly confident in voting as the path to change. The ruling class has successfully used propaganda to dumb down and manipulate most of the public because delusion has become the opiate of the masses.
And what appears to hasten or preempt man’s natural threshold for bearing infinite pain due to his infantile lingering “hope” for better times, is always inspiring leadership! Leaders courageous enough to boldly assert “enough”, with a vision and a plan, before that inevitable turning-point can be naturally reached when only the uncontrolled mob with nothing more to lose takes over – as it did in the French Revolution which subsequently spawned the tyranny of Napoleon!
Which is also why, the devilish hectoring hegemons, well versed in political science based state-craft and Machiavelli, Orwell and Huxley, also purposefully cultivate and promote the corrupt and the co-opted feudals to serve as false leaders of any plebeian peoples. These leaders are carefully manufactured to only serve their own larger class interests as client-states of higher authorities – the puppetmasters. If a genuine leader emerges who can mobilize a nation towards un-servitude, who can inspire and energize, he is assassinated as an example to all others.
Pakistan remains exemplary in this – see Project Humanbeingsfirst’s February 2008 prescient report “Who Killed Benazir Bhutto? In her own words!” , and its November 2007 solutions recommendations “Open Letter to a Pakistani General” . The election of Mr. Asif Ali Zardari as the new President of Pakistan confirms the setup by the Hectoring Hegemons for devilishly re-architecting Pakistan’s borders – as predicted in the series of reports on Pakistan’s Destabilization by Project Humanbeingsfirst – through increasing economic oppression     and tyranny  upon the common man  already unable to make ends meet .
And then, the ‘ubermensch’ will come on their white horse wielding “shock and awe” to “save” the “the very petri dish of international terrorism”  from becoming the new “Terror Central”  and threatening the civilized world due to its instability and civil war! That ominous “saving”  is already in its advanced setup stages  even as I write this. Many front-faces have been lined up who will retain and maintain the core-lie to continually enable the ‘ubermensch’ quest for “full spectrum dominance” – that of ‘war on terror’ – and the present incarnation with Mr. Zardari is just another “happy-happy” ever-smiling face!  But a more insidious face than the Generals’ before, in order to present the more acceptable illusion of freedom and democracy as that is what is being demanded by the constituency to be controlled. Well, let’s give it to them under the praetorian tutelage of a re-incarnated seasoned Godfather who can be relied upon to obediently do the master’s bidding on account of natural inclination  to usurp  and plunder , with plenty of skeletons in the closet to keep a strong check on the desired strategic direction when necessary! 
Observing the events of the day (September 10, 2008)  being rehearsed with all the pomp and majestic show – complete with horse-drawn buggy and kisses on the cheeks and all – before the applauding world with Mr. Zardari taking the highest oath of office in Pakistan, reminded me of the opening wedding scene from Mario Puzo’s movie the Godfather, attended by the motley of morality-challenged, all dressed in their finest Sunday outfits. The only thing that appeared to be missing during the festivities in the non-movie version was the camera zooming into private meetings in beautifully shuttered oak and mahogany paneled darkened rooms behind closed doors on how the “territory” was to be divided up, who would get what loot, and who would be assigned to make which offer that couldn’t be refused! Even the fictional Michael Coreleone could not go so “legit” as the real life enactment! Once made “legit” and cleansed into a “virgin”, is it slanderous to recall the past? None of the afore-stated staid recollections from newspaper reports even begin to scratch the real surface of the actual experiences of many Pakistanis under Asif Ali Zardari during the two short hereditary reigns of his beloved wife. His popular nom de guerre of “Mr. ten percent” among the general public hardly did him justice. And neither could Al Capone ever be charged for anything other than tax evasion! Even that opportunity no longer exists – so long as the godfather dutifully continues America’s “war on terror”!
The earnest columnist Ardeshir Cowasjee of the Daily Dawn had repeatedly noted in his many weekly columns that the former President, General Musharraf, was the best among the worst of the lot, and while I never agreed with the famous octogenarian of Pakistan on the notion of choosing the lesser of two evils from a carefully constrained artificial choice forcibly inflicted upon the suffering populace, I do agree with that sentiment. But not because of anything Ardeshir Cowasjee ever observed.
But because, with President Zardari at the helm, and aided in his mission by the mindlessly silly and horrendously greedy Parliamentarians who turn on a penny, Goethe’s notion of servitude – “none are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free” – is being attempted in Pakistan under a godfather-civilian ruler as an alternative to the brute servitude under a military-general that was beginning to wear thin with the people! The latter however, in comparison, was surely a superior option to serve under, as there was at least no illusion of freedom! The cycle of false-leaders is quite revealing even as it continually fosters only the imperial agendas.
Let’s snapshot from the setup that began this “imperial mobilization”: The democratically elected Nawaz Sharif being replaced by Musharraf in 1999 to acquire a “unity of command” over the client-state, and the pubic showing enormous relief at being rescued from their misery by a military dictator who seemed to wanna fix everything for them – for the people wanted someone strong to lead them after all the previous debacles under “democracy”; 9 years later Musharraf now being replaced by Zardari and the people once again showing even more relief because they wanted to be led by democracy once again after all the debacles under military dictatorship that has brought the country to the brink of bankruptcy and dismemberment! The new “democratic” leader now appears to be equally keen on fixing everything for the people, but marches quickly in lock-step to the same beat as his autocratic predecessors!
While the people are kept busy in these ‘katputli tamashas’ [puppet shows] expertly crafted for them by the Rand Corporation and the Pentagon in America, no element of “imperial mobilization” is ever left to chance. It is just as precision an operation in Pakistan as 911 was in New York! If a military strongman is needed to enable the ‘war on terror’ by nurturing “jihadis” with the attack on Afghanistan, the climate is created to install him. If destabilization is needed to enable dismemberment of a former front-line client-state which has outlived its usefulness on the ‘Grand Chessboard’ in its present configuration, faux democracy is crafted to bring the destabilization to its critical mass. The concept of years of planning and long consistent execution times, as is political science based state-craft, is entirely alien to the impetuous Pakistani mind. Brought up over the past sixty years to only expect uncertainty, loot and plunder, disappearances and oppression, a Pakistani has become mentally attuned to going to sleep at night not knowing who will be in-charge the next morning (or where one might wake up)!
Thus, the notion that a devilish multi-year precision planning, and such state-craft sophistication as the ‘dialectics of deception’ described by Project Humanbeingsfirst in many of its reports, is even possible, is entirely foreign to the relatively simple, feudalistic Pakistani genius. Therefore, ‘katputli tamashas’ and frequent change of Acts and actors is great for the masses – for many couldn’t care less who is in power, tied as most have become to their daily bread and hope for miraculous deliverance!
The exuberance shown by the world’s leaders in rushing to congratulate the new Mr. 100% Pakistani President into their fold – one who had candidly noted: ‘The Pakistan People’s Party (PPP), if it comes into power, must persuade the people that the fight against militants is “our war”, not just America’s war’  – and all of them together agreeing to maintain that enabling core-lie of “imperial mobilization” intact, amply demonstrates this.
This coddling of a person who was further reported brazenly proclaiming “Asif Ali Zardari told a British TV that political agreements were not words of Qura’an which could not be changed with the changing political scenario. According to the TV, he was asked about his shifting positions and not fulfilling his promises to which he said there was nothing final in politics and positions could change with the changing situations.” , makes President Zardari actually the best qualified among the lot for the job of presiding over the dismembering of Pakistan! One who need not, by one’s own admission, honor any agreements one may sign, or the deals one may make, with one’s own countrymen in order to gain their trust! Wow! What an egregiously blatant mocking of a peoples quite accustomed to “Voluntary Servitude”. Notice that there are no riots in the streets in Pakistan, no protests, and while the nation’s ruling elite is politically and visibly united in celebrating the victory of democracy over dictatorship, the poor man is kept busy trying to barely survive!
Finally, one can rightfully claim, that there is little difference between the peoples of America, and the peoples of Pakistan – united they do stand in “hope” and inaction for a better tomorrow, as the rich plunderers laugh their way to the bank!
Indeed, I hate to suggest once again that all this was plainly manifest when Musharraf had issued his own proclamations paving the way for PPP and Bhutto to come to power with the NRO and the sacking of the judges by crafting his unilateral Executive Orders, which like in America, once made into law, become effectively irreversible. I had plainly written on December 21, 2007 in Project Humanbeingsfirst’s warning to the Pakistani peoples “Wakeup to the grotesque reality of the ‘Grand Chessboard’!”  (while most of the Pakistani and Western press appeared not to have ever been students of political science, history, or even forensic science – the only reason most among them are likely called journalists, the press, the newsmedia, is surely only because they carry suitably designed business cards or are rich enough to own the media – there are a few exceptions of course, as shown by this oped in the Nation of February 22, 2008 ; and I have no idea why the rest of the respected columnists like Ardeshir Cowasjee remained silent, despite my urgent and repeated pleas to them to at least comment on the warning in their own soap-boxes in order to draw attention to it, as no English newspaper in Pakistan was willing to publish it or any of the letters to editor  that I sent them before I gave up on further wasting my time; I had also, in my earnestness, foolishly apprised two newly retired 3-star Pakistani Generals in Islamabad of these matters over a long private lunch conversation, with obviously little impact and much wasted effort):
#2. The present ‘elections’ in Pakistan are a manifest fraud under the orchestration of the ‘hectoring hegemons’ themselves, and must be abandoned in the greater national interest of the peoples of Pakistan themselves.
This mantra of elections is replete with red herrings craftily synthesized to maintain Pakistan as a servile client-state in order to carry on with the same bold ‘imperial designs’ on the ‘Grand Chessboard’. It is merely the rebottling of the same old wine in a different bottle. It will surely be legitimately conducted, with no apparent riggings, and duly approved by all the impartial international observers to give the artful elections an official international legitimacy.
It is quite immaterial who wins in these elections. The laws and the judiciary of the nation have already been reconstituted under the umbrella of ’emergency’ to enable the nation to carry on unfettered in its primary objective of fighting the ‘War on Terror’ as an obedient patsy client-state – and hence to carry on in its own devilishly crafted suicide!
These elections will conveniently ‘elect’ a legislature whose leaders have also been deftly primed by the ‘hectoring hegemons’ themselves! And the highest executive office in the land is already retained in the hands of the same old ‘wine’ drinker.
Thus all the ‘ducks’ are still lined up perfectly in a row, just as they were on the very eve of 911.
#3. The people of Pakistan must fully reconcile with the Military of Pakistan immediately – the reconciliation being of the type that was witnessed by the surprised world between the oppressors and the oppressed in South Africa.
Not the type that is being pushed through the NRO to legitimize looters, plunderers, and rapists of the nation in order to staff the legislature with the made by ‘CFR in the USA’ and made by ‘RIIA in the UK’ Pakistani politicians with at best criminal credentials, and at worst, treasonous ones!
The military of Pakistan, as an institution, is indeed also the only hope of Pakistan as we must survive on the ‘Grand Chessboard’ and only they hold the cards. What is about to befall the nation can also only be averted by them. The civilians and the Military must unite – immediately – for overarching national considerations that far transcend individual grievances, ego trips, and past transgressions.
Thus the civilians must abandon all meaningless and mindless protests which are in any case devoid of any fundamental comprehension of the reality du jour on the ‘Grand Chessboard’ – none of them seek fundamental changes to our fate, nor do they appear to fathom what such changes are even supposed to be – and are merely only chasing red herrings that have been deftly crafted as perhaps per the Machiavellian ‘technique of infamy’. …
These protests are needlessly continually giving the Western public the impression of ‘instability’ which only adds to the credibility of the various pretextual mantras to come ‘deliver’ us from ourselves! There is much more at stake than to usher in a thin veneer of faux ‘democracy’ which is all that these protests are unwittingly accomplishing as can be empirically witnessed by anyone with half a brain.
#4 Instead of the faux ‘democracy’, the Pakistani Military rulers on their part must now rise to the challenge of genuine patriotism and as genuine guardians of the nation and help carve a genuine Democracy, with the capital D and without the quotes, as briefly outlined in “Re-Imagining Pakistan’s Defenses – Open Letter to a Pakistani General”, and as explored in “Saving Pakistan from Synthetic ‘Terror Central’ ”.
Briefly, that entails crafting a genuine Constitution under a bilateral ‘social contract’ between the people and the state, that is subsequently ratified by the people of Pakistan through a direct referendum vote. This can be accomplished within a few short months if there is the national and military will that understands the urgency of the matter and executes on it by gathering the right peoples to craft it!
Item 2 above, in bold, appears amazingly prescient – right? The new “wine drinker” makes little impact on the journey however. And we observe that Musharraf withdrew  without rectifying any of his own power-shenanigans in favor of the new “wine drinker” whom he had himself enabled and pardoned with the NRO that has lent new meaning to the adage ‘steal only in millions and billions, for generous pardon in the name of national security, national interest, or national reconciliation is the only outcome for monumental crimes when all loot’.
The new “wine drinker” in turn was, and is, being guided by the same hectoring hegemons     who crafted and led the American foreign policy in the decimation of Afghanistan and Iraq, as expected – and so brazenly at times that there is no need to even hide that fact from the public – when Musharraf very well could have implemented all of the afore-stated recommendations for the genuine protection of Pakistan, as he enjoyed absolute power and the public would have welcomed his moves against the hectoring hegemons with open arms! Therefore, the lame surprise as demonstrated in this news report, aptly titled “Benazir’s promise remains unfulfilled” , is at best – well what can one say that hasn’t already been said about the press! Pakistani media is now but a distant reflection of the American media eagerly galloping down the same path. See Chapters 4, 6, and 7 of my book “Prisoners of the Cave” for a better understanding of what one is likely to see more and more of in Pakistan! 
If all this prescience is such advanced rocket science, how is it that an ordinary plebeian, with only a computer and an internet connection, can figure it all out, including the solution space, and none of the profound intelligentsia and the press in Pakistan can? The answer must be that we are a well deserving nation ready to be replaced by a better peoples – as per the promise of the Qur’an! But wait – I am not ready to be replaced, nor am I willing to accept that verdict, and neither are the 200 million Pakistanis suffering under the yoke of the handful of co-opted praetorian ruling elite of Pakistan! “Voluntary Servitude” may indeed be our failing due to excessive misplaced hope, but is that as criminally culpable as the tyrants who criminally rule over us by exploiting that failing? Being a victim is not a crime, even if being a foolish one repeatedly is reprehensible!
Under such a torpid existence of the patiently servile populace forever controlled by different flavored praetorian tyrants serving only the larger geopolitical interests under Machiavellianly crafted, political-science based, Western state-craft, it is only the perverse insanity of “Balance of Terror”  that can “free” the common man without him expending his own efforts to break his “hope” driven “voluntary servitude”! For at least, under the “balance of terror” doctrine, he becomes as “free” to survive as the poor beetle enslaved between two hungry scorpions. The astute beetle can construct some space to still breathe and live in that precariously balanced time-space continuum! In a world where one’s very existence is anathema to the ‘ubermensch’ hectoring hegemons, and one’s extinction is their planned endgame for population control and elimination of a vast majority of “useless eaters” from the planet, physical survival by hook or by crook must first rationally precede any freedom from servitude. The latter struggle in these times appears to be next to impossible task, with expert and sophisticated global masters deftly managing “hope” driven populations into a permanent state of “Voluntary Servitude” – by trickling some minimal level of sustenance down their throats to not cause all loss of “hope” and the concomitant violent riots when it’s not needed – while cleverly inhibiting the rise of any popular leadership (or dissemination of knowledge of what’s in store for them) that can genuinely lead them to the contrary!
Therefore, “balance of terror” forms an imperative doctrine of urgent survival conveniently not examined in political science discourses, never mind the global press, but is the only realizable and efficacious solution-space taught by nature itself for the times when ‘ubermensch’ hectoring hegemons rule the roost. See Project Humanbeingsfirst’s August and September 2008 reports “Georgia-Russia: It’s a Classic Brzezinski Project!”  and “Hegemony is as old as mankind”  respectively, for how aggressive (i.e., non-passive) posturing between titans can temporarily reprieve an almost sure to be decimated nation on the ‘Grand Chessboard! And if played astutely – as Russia appears to be doing by announcing the stationing of its largest nuclear armed warship in the Caribbean waters  and its anti-submarine aircraft at the Venezuelan airport  – permanently reprieve it, and all others as well.
An effective counter to the IMF/WB/NATO and the dollar-hegemony, by SCO for instance, under an uncompromising leadership from Russia, China, India, Iran, Venezuela, et. al., while simultaneously enabling the United States to actually bring her coveted SPP into fruition through her own crafty shenanigans, can give reprieve to all servile client-states of the Global South without a masses’ destructive uncontrolled revolution when the “hope” threshold is finally breached. The SPP prematurely being forced to create the North American Union, by other nations outside the Pax Americana forcing a dollar crisis upon it before it is ready, can be the best reprieve for the world. Provided of course, the rest of the planet is empowered to astutely dump the dollar before the dollar dumps them! The guns at China’s and Middle East nations’ throats remain there mainly to prevent that very act of defiance. America’s creditors are targeted to remain patiently holding onto their dollar reserves until the opportune time for the United States, as the new North American Union, to adopt the new yet to be introduced Amerio. Thus in one fell swoop, the richest nation on Earth intends to not only write off all its debts, backed with big guns, but also (selectively) crash all the Asian creditor nations’ economies. Much use is Confederate currency today, except in a museum.
This is the un-stated purpose behind Iranian President Ahmadinejad’s bold suggestion in the last SCO meeting on August 28, 2008 “Iran’s suggestion is to use the currencies of the SCO states in transactions between members of the organization, … Such a measure will help maintain and strengthen the value of the foreign exchange reserves of member states. The organization can also devise a long term plan to study the feasibility of using a single currency in the future”, in order to preempt these nations’ growing supply of future toilet-paper! 
This gambit of prematurely forcing the Hectoring Hegemons’ already pre-planned “revolutionary time” to make possible what would otherwise be “inconceivable in normal times” – in other words, turning the tables on the Hectoring Hegemons with their own devilish weapon – is now perhaps the only realistic way to motivate the “Prisoners of the Cave” out of their “Voluntary Servitude” to standup for the sanctity of their own nation.
The same patriotic fervor which indoctrinates the public into “United We Stand”, can also create active resistance among the same peoples who love their country so blindly that they are willing to acquiesce to the merciless killing of other ‘lesser’ humanity in the absurdity of preemptive ‘self-defense’! No patriotic public in the entire pluralistic multicultural America, no matter how indoctrinated, will voluntarily accept a North American Union, a loss of their beloved America that was hitherto fully defined by the Monroe Doctrine of four well defined borders. And forcing this union upon the peoples through martial law remaining the only choice available to the hectoring hegemons, will finally align the American public’s patriotism with the rest of the world’s interests! In that reprieve scenario – a ransom from extinction through full spectrum alliances by the rest of the world – new leaders among the hope-driven populace all across the world might yet be born under these “revolutionary times”, who can eventually lead their servile populations into aborting their “Voluntary Servitude”! While one might perhaps call this logic perversely “hope” based, the history of the world, as is the history of the American Revolution (see Patrick Henry’s speech below), is also testament to courageous leaders often arising among a fed-up public mainly at crises times when there is no “hope” left.
In a calculated play of astute political science against the devilish one, the same manipulative tools can serve both masters on the ‘Grand Chessboard’, not just the hectoring hegemons! Unfortunately, its efficacy lies solely with state-actors, institutions, and apparatus. Therefore, ordinary masses under astute political leadership can actually directly play in that space by efficaciously engaging the state in order to throw-off the yolk of their “Voluntary Servitude” as explained by Project Humanbeingsfirst in its numerous  reports .
“Hope” – the eternal friend and the perennial enemy of man! Hope is what empirically subverts us from becoming the so called “Ashraf-ul-Makhluqat”, and lulls us into inaction even as it enables us to survive the darkest of times without despondency! Like a snake’s venom, both a poison and an antidote, “hope” is what co-opts us to become less than animals by falsely leading us into losing our basic instincts to be free from servitude under some fuzzy higher cerebral function of optimism that we seem to have acquired from who knows where over the eons of supposed evolution of our species! There are however no vestiges of such an abstraction in the Darwinian worldview of how man might have descended from the lower beings. No other living creature possesses it, in any amount. It is characteristically a human trait! Where does “hope” spring from? Did god implant it in us? Or did the devil? When is it god’s work, when is it the devil’s, and how is it an evolutionary gift that leaves no trace in other species, but is present in all of humankind on all continents? Is there a “hope” gene?
Regardless, it is quite evident that it is mainly the deprivation of “hope” that enables one to abandon “Voluntary Servitude”. Be it towards the despondency of the weak, and hence they perish. Or be it towards the assertion of fight-back by the strong – who have had it up to their neck and are not willing to take it anymore as they are going to perish anyway, who are left with no hope of being rescued by anyone else and have nothing further to lose by standing up – by their minimally copying the instinctive behavior  of the free animals! The courageous history of mankind is evidence that it is only when there is no hope of rescue, or of the suffocating conditions ameliorating, that “Voluntary Servitude” ends!
This was indeed the premise behind the famous speech given by Patrick Henry on March 23, 1775  when he hath proclaimed: “Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!” A fuller quote would be more instructive:
“There is no longer any room for hope. If we wish to be free–if we mean to preserve inviolate those inestimable privileges for which we have been so long contending–if we mean not basely to abandon the noble struggle in which we have been so long engaged, and which we have pledged ourselves never to abandon until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained–we must fight! I repeat it, sir, we must fight! An appeal to arms and to the God of hosts is all that is left us! They tell us, sir, that we are weak; unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger? Will it be the next week, or the next year? Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and when a British guard shall be stationed in every house? Shall we gather strength but irresolution and inaction? Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance by lying supinely on our backs and hugging the delusive phantom of hope, until our enemies shall have bound us hand and foot? Sir, we are not weak if we make a proper use of those means which the God of nature hath placed in our power. The millions of people, armed in the holy cause of liberty, and in such a country as that which we possess, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us. Besides, sir, we shall not fight our battles alone. There is a just God who presides over the destinies of nations, and who will raise up friends to fight our battles for us. The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave. Besides, sir, we have no election. If we were base enough to desire it, it is now too late to retire from the contest. There is no retreat but in submission and slavery! Our chains are forged! Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Boston! The war is inevitable–and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come.
It is in vain, sir, to extentuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace–but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!”
Only a year later, the intimate realization that “There is no longer any room for hope”, led to a Declaration which today, surely still resonates, albeit mutely, in the hearts of some, and sends a winter’s chill down the spine of every despot and demagogue:
When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.
But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
Wherefore such a people? Only whence bereft of hope, and only when courageously led! Or at least, that is what the empirical history of mankind suggests.
Elevating oneself to man’s ultimate destiny of “Ashraf-ul-Makhluqat”, i.e., the highest spiritual state of “Irfan”, which Islam axiomatically teaches is the ultimate “khud-muktar” man of God’s creation, wherein – as artistically put by that famous ‘Poet of the East’ – the Creator too favors the “best of creation” by asking the “khud-muktar” man what might he desire as his destiny before apportioning the same to him, is a far cry! Muslims apparently are forever dreaming of “Irfan” – at least the ones in our beloved ‘Land of the Pure’, with every Pakistani serf awaiting a savior, every oppressed “waiting for Allah”, all patiently bearing their burden resigned to their destiny of toil and hunger, but still full of hope for some miraculous rescue, and seeking comfort in the vision of a rewarding after-life for their stoic forbearance in this ill-fated one – while we, the egotistical us, cannot even live up to the level of exercising the innate desire to be free as shown by the animals! Forget about other useful self-defense  taught us by the supposed lower order beings! Whence “Ashraf-ul-Makhluqat”?
Surely it must have been a metaphor for some other man yet to be born! A man who will finally understand the gift of “hope” – to protect one from despondency – and yet not be unduly saddled by it into “Voluntary Servitude”, as beautifully and succinctly spelled out for him in the last two of the four short verses of Surah Asr in the Qura’an! While the Western Hegemons  cleverly hijack the concept of jihad to create “militant Islam”, “radical Islam”, and “Islamism”, and mindless “native informants” par excellence continually bleat it for multiplied effect in asinine writings such as “Between Imperialism and Islamism”  that keep the core-lie of “Islamism” intact in dutiful service to their higher masters (or perhaps only serving them in pathetic ignorance as patsies), its real meaning becomes imprisoned in La Boétie’s “Voluntary Servitude” until hopelessness, with little possibility of parole  during our lifetime!
Yes, “happy-happy” indeed on the long road of voluntary serfdom into oblivion.
 Joel S. Hirschhorn, ‘Working Poor Unready to Revolt’ http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/cgi-bin/blogs/voices.php/2008/08/09/p27615
 Daily Times, September 08, 2008, ‘Pakistan could be next big IMF customer’ http://dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=200898\story_8-9-2008_pg1_6
 The Nation, August 28, 2008, ’14-hour loadshedding’ in Karachi http://www.nation.com.pk/pakistan-news-newspaper-daily-english-online/Regional/Karachi/28-Aug-2008/14hour-loadshedding
 The Nation, August 28, 2008, ‘Industry suffering due to power shortage’ in Lahore http://www.nation.com.pk/pakistan-news-newspaper-daily-english-online/Business/28-Aug-2008/Industry-suffering-due-to-power-shortage
 Business Recorder, August 29, 2008, ‘Business activities come to a halt: power outages in various parts of Faisalabad’ http://www.brecorder.com/index.php?id=801230
 Daily Times, September 08, 2008, ‘Military unlikely to pressure new president’ http://dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=200898\story_8-9-2008_pg1_7
 The News, September 01, 2008, ‘An endless struggle for survival’ http://www.thenews.com.pk/daily_detail.asp?id=133206
 The News, September 01, 2008, ‘People going to bed hungry due to record price hike’ http://thenews.jang.com.pk/daily_detail.asp?id=133205
 AP, September 11, 2008, ‘ Officials: Bush OK’d US raids in Pakistan’ http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080911/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_pakistan and ‘ Bush secretly approved free hand to US troops in Pakistan’ http://www.zeenews.com/articles.asp?aid=468185&sid=WOR
 The News, September 10, 2008, ‘The president, his massive support, the big disappointment’ http://thenews.jang.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=17140
 John F. Burns, NYT January 9, 1998, ‘HOUSE OF GRAFT: Tracing the Bhutto Millions — A special report.; Bhutto Clan Leaves Trail of Corruption’ http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B0CE5D91F30F93AA35752C0A96E958260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=print
 Anjali Mody, Indian Express April 14, 1998, ‘Graft charges against Benazir lead to UK’ http://www.indianexpress.com/res/web/pIe/ie/daily/19980414/10450284.html
 NYT July 28, 1998, ‘ Bhutto Is Ordered to Post Bail in Graft Case’ http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9407E5DA1638F93BA15754C0A96E958260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=print
 Zee News, November 01, 2007, ‘Pak ready to give Swiss courts` proof in Bhutto`s graft case’ http://www.zeenews.com/print_articles.asp?rep=2&aid=404772&sid=SAS
 The News, September 10, 2008, ‘Pakistan enters Zardari era’ http://thenews.jang.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=17139
 Daily Times, February 17, 2008, ‘Taliban fight is our war: Zardari’ http://dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=20082\17\story_17-2-2008_pg7_7
 The News, August 24, 2008, ‘Agreements not words of Qura’an’ http://thenews.jang.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=16803
 Dawn, August 27, 2008, ‘US envoy to UN questioned over contacts with Asif’ http://www.dawn.com/2008/08/27/top8.htm
 Dawn, August 27, 2008, ‘US defends Khalilzad’ http://www.dawn.com/2008/08/27/top14.htm
 Dawn, September 04, 2008, ‘Khalilzad denies providing political advice to Zardari’ http://www.dawn.com/2008/09/04/top22.htm
 The News, September 10, 2008, ‘Benazir’s promise remains unfulfilled’ http://thenews.jang.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=17163
 Defense Tech, September 10, 2008, ‘Russian Force to the Caribbean’ http://www.defensetech.org/archives/004410.html
 Daily Times, September 09, 2008, ‘Russia to base anti-submarine aircraft in Venezuela’ http://dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=200899\story_9-9-2008_pg4_2
 Press TV, August 28, 2008, ‘Iran proposes using SCO currencies’ http://www.presstv.com/Detail.aspx?id=67804§ionid=351020101
 Patrick Henry, ‘Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death’ http://www.law.ou.edu/ushistory/henry.shtml
 Video ‘Battle at Kruger’, please watch this 8-minute inspiring video that puts “Ashraf-ul-Makhluqat” to shame, which, as of this date, has been watched at least 36,687,965 times, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LU8DDYz68kM
 Zbigniew Brzezinski on Pak-Afghan border, 1980, “God is on your side”, watch video at: http://sites.google.com/site/humanbeingsfirst/download-pdf/god_is_on_your_side.wmv?attredirects=0 Also see http://humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2008/08/georgia-russia-its-aclassic-brzezinski.html#Part-II
Press Release Wakeup Pakistanis – Nuclear Strikes Await Thee as ‘“Defensive” US Military Action’!
June 12, 2008
[June 12, 2008] Pakistan’s English daily DAWN, today reported the following re-confirmation of the dire threat that Project Humanbeingsfirst has been harping about for a year ever since the Lal Masjid massacre, but to no avail:
‘[On] Wednesday, a media report quoted Pakistan’s envoy to Washington as saying that US leaders had warned Islamabad that if the United States suffered an attack that was traced back to Pakistan Washington would retaliate. “Those (statements) have been made,” Ambassador Hussain Haqqani told editors and reporters at The Washington Post. “We want to make sure that it doesn’t come to that.”’
As the Pakistani press is abuzz with the US military attack on Pakistan’s forces that saw at least 11 Pakistani soldiers dead with only lip service protests emanating from the co-opted Pakistani corridors of pelf and power, the new neo-con Ambassador of Pakistan to Washington further reiterated the following to officially re-cement and renew the fiction of ‘Bin Laden’ for what is criminally about to befall both Pakistan and Iran as foretold in this Wakeup Call – and in which, Pakistani Government and Pakistani military are either equally deliberately complicit, or entirely unable to comprehend the gravity of the matter as they both still continue to toot ‘Bin Laden’ and the ‘War on Terror’ fabrication:
‘Pakistan would attack Osama bin Laden the moment it had reliable intelligence on the Al Qaeda leader’s whereabouts, Ambassador Husain Haqqani said on Wednesday. Haqqani also said he was confident Pakistan could help foil any Al Qaeda plans to attack the United States, although he did not know of any right now. “I think we can thwart any potential plans for an attack,” Haqqani said in an interview with Reuters.’ (DAWN)
If the Government of Pakistan is genuinely interested in thwarting “any potential plans for an attack” – please read and comprehend this humble Wakeup Call issued by Project Humanbeingsfirst on December 21, 2007. Or at least watch the far more entertaining Star Wars movie “Revenge of the Sith” – a bizarre convolution of art imitating life, and life imitating art – to apprehend the grotesque reality on the ‘Grand Chessboard’ that is behind the murderous ‘War on Terror’ which Pakistan’s erstwhile Ambassador, Husain Haqqani, in collusion with his neo-con sponsors, is either deliberately or inadvertently pushing upon this (soon to be) sixth-world nation!
From Gen. Musharraf “In the Line of Fire”, to the late Benazir’s “very petri dish of international terrorism”, to the erstwhile godfather’s ‘The Pakistan People’s Party (PPP), if it comes into power, must persuade the people that the fight against militants is “our war”, not just America’s war,’ – is one continuous narration of patsies, mercenaries, traitors, or naïve simpletons! Take your pick – in all cases, all unfit to govern a self-respecting independent sovereign nation in a modernity that is ruled entirely with master political science rather than personal “khilafat”. But all perfectly fit as controlled managers of puppetstates dancing to the strings of the puppetmasters!
In this lowly puppetstate of ours called Pakistan – the land of the pure and the pious – there are 200 million additional peoples still (barely) living besides the “naive simpletons” who are presumably born to lord upon its plebeian natives! Please, for their sake, put it to the referendum as outlined in this Wakeup Call, and urgently disengage from the fiction of “war on terror” by vociferously declaring a demonstrable “Samson Option” directly targeted at Israel and Western Europe! This is the first urgent macro move in the only remaining geostrategic gamesmanship on the ‘Grand Chessboard’ that can still safeguard the humble and lowly peoples of this densely populated region from the devastation of a ‘“Defensive” US military action’ – which will be nuclear!
A collaborative mutual Asian self-defense pact (ATO) that is bar none to NATO, and an Asian economic alliance (SCO) that is bar none to EU and America’s own ‘Security and Prosperity Partnership’ (SPP) alliance being forged in the North – as outlined by Project Humanbeingsfirst in its Press Release of May 15, 2008 (titled “The Only Solution to Avoid Total War – Full Spectrum Alliances in ASIA”) – is the only rational way to safeguard Asia, its vast riches, and its billions of inhabitants from all marauders and hectoring hegemons.
The infamous “White Man’s Burden” today seeks drastic world population reduction through induced food shortages and laboratory synthesized diseases, ‘global warming’ mantras of natural phenomenon to curtail production induced natural growth of developing nations, and ‘war on terror’ mantras to acquire “full spectrum dominance” through forcible “birth pangs of a new [World Order]”, all of which are inter-connected links in the chain of incremental and step-wise exercise of global hegemony to usher in their long dreamed of “One World Government” of the world’s financial, technocratic and corporate ruling elite!
This tortuous incantation of the revived “White Man’s Burden” is written in their own crafty penmanship – if only the “naive simpletons” would learn to read and think in a Western led modernity whose most prized crown jewels of governance is ‘ubermensch’ intellectual and political thought that they diligently endeavor to freely giveaway without any fear of the lowly plebeians and their “naive simpleton” rulers ever acquiring it! Despite the internet, search engines, and the ubiquitous web browser!
Thusly, our managed nations remain devoid of modern public libraries and the culture of reading and scholarship among our peoples for no accidental reason! Our laborers and taxi drivers have cellphones, but our educated ruling class have no culture of learning! Our leadership is largely the product of the same feudal ecosystem – unless the courteous label of “naive simpletons” accorded them is overly generous. In such an event, Project Humanbeingsfirst has no practical moves and strategies to offer on the ‘Grand Chessboard’. It equally dreads the unpredictability and world chaos of a plebeian revolution simultaneously flaring up in the entire Global South that tars and feathers the entire ruling elites and native informants across the board in these nations!
Such a mob rule, naturally leading to infighting for local hegemony by emergent breed of Mafia dons and militias, will surely end in global disaster even for the secure armed to the teeth “White Man” of the global North – with no organized production machinery and laborers of economic conscription left to produce for them! The “birth pangs” that the modern “White Man” of all skin colors induces through “Mission Accomplished” of the “Bush Doctrine” among the ‘lesser’ mankind, would have naturally produced ‘Frankensteins’ out of ordinary peoples only laboring for birthing justice, which they, and their ‘ubermensch’ rapists and murderers, will scarcely be able to control. The Taliban are a living existential example of this prognostication in the aftermath of America’s raping of the peoples of Afghanistan for “giving to the USSR its Vietnam War” with the generous gift of “God is on your side” (See “Selling the Carter Doctrine”, Time Magazine, February 18, 1980).
The White Man’s Burden remains the same – throughout the centuries – only different names in different decades of every century!
Please act today to effectively reinstate the bizarre sanity and perverse sanctity of the “balance of terror” in which, once again, “safety will be the sturdy child of terror and survival the twin brother of annihilation.” And do it smarter this time around!
A public service message of rational equitable self-defense humbly brought to you by Project HumanbeingsfirstTM.org.
contact person: Zahir Ebrahim
From Balance of Terror to Unilateral Terror on the Grand Chessboard!
April 26, 2008
Douglas J. Feith, Undersecretary of Defense for Policy, in his Hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee on February 14, 2002 in the aftermath of 911, explaining the rationale for the Department of Defence 2002 Nuclear Posture Review, summarized the overarching reasons for “new thinking” by the United States as the unchallenged sole superpower in the following words:
‘A half a century ago, in the midst of the Cold War, Prime Minister Winston Churchill noted in the House of Commons the “sublime irony” that in the nuclear age, “safety will be the sturdy child of terror and survival the twin brother of annihilation.” The Cold War is long over and new approaches to defense are overdue. As President Bush has stated, “We are no longer divided into armed camps, locked in a careful balance of terror.…Our times call for new thinking.” ‘
In essence, and as has been empirically evident over the past seven years, what Douglas Feith was arguing before the United States Congress in the euphemistically disguised verbiage of “new thinking”, was that the “careful balance of terror” must now be replaced by unfettered and uninhibited unilateral terror!
As his intellectual mentor Zbigniew Brzezinski had previously argued during the Clinton era in 1997, the goals for American primacy and its geostrategic imperatives had to be to “perpetuate America’s own dominant position for at least a generation and preferably longer” such that “no Eurasian challenger emerges, capable of dominating Eurasia and thus also challenging America”.
For it was indeed the first time in the history of civilizations and its conquistadors that America had become “the first, only, and last truly global superpower”. It was deemed a terrible waste of hegemonic bank balance to not capitalize on it while there was still time to do so, before other nations of the East and Eurasia eventually caught up to America’s lead in about a generation and forced another Détente.
The Project for the New American Century (PNAC), that had seeded the majority of Bush Administration officials beginning in 2000 – from Vice President to Secretary of Defence to a majority of Under Secretaries – too had argued in its report on Rebuilding America’s Defences that seeking “full spectrum dominance” to maintain “America’s preeminence” and “American Peace” in the world by forcing other nations to accept “America’s unique role in preserving and extending an international order friendly to our security, our prosperity, and our principles”, was a natural American imperative as per the Brzezinski truism “Hegemony is as old as mankind.”
And if achieving “full spectrum” primacy meant inflicting “shock and awe” of unilateral terror on contrived mobilizing pretexts, so be it – as which nation could now stand in the path of the mighty ‘hectoring hegemons’?
But there was indeed an impediment to the realization of this “new thinking”, and to the enormous increase in the defence budget needed to support it, as explained by Zbigniew Brzezinski. It was the darn “populist democracy” of the sole superpower!
Fighting in far-away lands is quite “uncongenial to democratic instincts” noted Brzezinski, as the “economic self-denial (that is defense spending), and the human sacrifice (casualties even among professional soldiers) required in the effort” makes “democracy … inimical to imperial mobilization.”
Therefore, a commensurate lifetime of “War on Terrorism” was architected against a well formulated never-ending enemy – the “islamofascists” – in a Machiavellianly seeded doctrine of the “Clash of Civilizations”. Bernard Lewis had artfully constructed that bit of magic in Foreign Affairs magazine in 1990 as the “irrational … roots of Muslim rage … [which] is no less than a clash of civilizations”. In the aftermath of 9/11/2001, it became the self-fulfilling policy of the overtly exuded foreign policy calculus of the United States, and was continually replenished by more priceless doctrinal state-craft from the mighty pen of Bernard Lewis, like ‘Crisis of Islam – Holy War and Unholy Terror’! And of course, the doctrinal flames are still fanned periodically by the various circus clowns of empire, like the printing of offensive cartoons by a confrere of Daniel Pipes. It egregiously insulted the Prophet of Islam to further stimulate a reaction among the Muslims that could only be classified as “[not even] a Clash of Civilizations [but a] Clash between the Civilized World and Barbarians”.
In order to get the ball rolling ab initio, to both seed the “military transformation” necessary to capitalize on America being “the first, only, and last truly global superpower”, and to embark on the “American peace” mission that called for “new thinking” of forcing other nations to accept “America’s unique role”, the “populist democracy” needed a shocker: a “catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor”.
Well, 911 was that “new Pearl Harbor”!
Whether 19 “islamofascist” jihadis on their flying carpets controlled by a mind-melding yoda master sitting on his bare rump armed with laptops and cell phones in a cave in the Hindu-Kush did it, or whether it was an expertly orchestrated, precision planned and executed controlled demolition, is a moot point. For it was an ‘operation canned goods’ all the way in terms of providing the enabling pretext for “imperial mobilization” on the proverbial screen of Plato’s Mythical Cave! Whoever did it was, and still is, a resourceful confrere and great benefactor of the conquistadors!
But that shocking event in itself could have easily been still-born, as it could have just as easily been dealt with as a great crime and not a cause célèbre for massive invasion of other nations. The crime scene could have been secured and a forensic analysis of the evidence performed to understand how did three tall towers miraculously collapse within the span of a few hours in a single day into exactly their own footprints at almost free-fall speed.
Zbigniew Brzezinski had astutely observed of this “populist democracy”, that:
“as America becomes an increasingly multicultural society, it may find it more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues, except in the circumstance of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat. …. More generally, cultural change in America may also be uncongenial to the sustained exercise abroad of genuinely imperial power. That exercise requires a high degree of doctrinal motivation, intellectual commitment, and patriotic gratification.”
Yes indeed, along with 911, the secret sauce to the recipe, so to speak, was, and still continues to be, “a high degree of doctrinal motivation, intellectual commitment, and patriotic gratification”!
In other words, without fully conditioned ‘Prisoners of the Cave’, no amount of pyrotechnics would have worked because a free public and its democratic institutions, the law makers in Congress and the influential newsmedia, could have easily demanded a forensic analysis of the crime scene rather than trivially acquiesce to a rush to passing oppressive domestic laws like the Patriot Acts without any discussion and hasty recourse to “Infinite Justice” with even less evidence.
The United States public had to be so dexterously primed with the multi-faceted mantras crafted of the “sudden threat or challenge to the public’s sense of domestic well-being”, that today, seven years later, its successes can be measured all the way to several Nobel Prizes in Profound Political Machinations (PPM – if such an accolade for hegemonic conquest was to be split off from the Nobel Peace Prize). The latest evidence for such a prize accumulating to the Bush Administration in spades is in the public survey by Gallup Poll released on March 31, 2008, which states: “Iran topped the list, with 25 percent naming it when asked which country is the greatest U.S. enemy,”. And most Americans, the vast majority, and certainly most of the 25 percent in the above survey, have likely never met an Iranian person, or anyone from any of the exotic regions from where the ubiquitous boogiemen are being fashioned!
This criminal priming of the “populist democracy” now naturally enables “the first, only, and last truly global superpower” to be fully “autocratic abroad” in its unlimited “capacity for military intimidation”. Note how Brzezinski concludes the primacy aspirations of the truly global superpower:
“Geostrategic success in that cause would represent a fitting legacy of America’s role as the first, only, and last truly global superpower.”
And it is precisely in that overarching “Geostrategic … cause”, that Iran and Pakistan are today imminently staged on the nuclear chopping block to seed the “Geostrategic success”, while some American city is made expendable to create the next “catalyzing event” for continuing “imperial mobilization” that “will make Sept. 11 pale by comparison”.
All conveniently enabled by the continued Orwellian use of the fiction of ‘Bin Laden’ and its various surrogates including ‘Al Qaeeda’. If these stick-wielding cave-dwelling antediluvians possess such awesome powers as to bring down the sole superpower and its Western allies to their knees forcing the leader to spend 3.1 trillion dollars next year a majority of it on defense, and the Western peoples to also lose all their democratic freedoms and civil liberties to end up living in police-states, then the ‘Bin Laden’ mantra is surely more powerful than the USSR! Or at least, it makes a wonderful ‘Ali Baba’ bedtime story.
So participate in the story telling of ‘Ali Baba’ all you want dear Pakistanis – because the endgame of Pakistan’s ruling elite in their fictional of “war on terror” appears to be the same as the hectoring hegemons! As the latter destroys the United States to craft a borderless New World Order laying many a million victims in its path, the new amorphous empire’s gratitude await many a servile clients and native informants for services rendered! Or perhaps the hangman’s noose!
Indeed, this “new thinking”, it turns out, isn’t terribly new after all. It was discovered, for those still in possession of memory, to already have been defined as the “supreme international crime” at the Nuremberg Military Tribunals by the United States’ own Chief Prosecutor, Justice Robert H. Jackson. A crime so stupendous and monumental “differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole”, that the Nazi war machine was held responsible for “all the evil that follows” in the aftermath of the first primal aggression! The Nazis had invaded Poland on the heels of their own Operation Canned Goods too, in the pretext of ‘self-defense’ against ‘terrorists’! And in handing their leadership death sentences, the American Chief Prosecutor had asserted:
“If certain acts of violation of treaties are crimes, they are crimes whether the United States does them or whether Germany does them, and we are not prepared to lay down a rule of criminal conduct against others which we would not be willing to have invoked against us.”
And that, as they say, is all there is to this “new thinking”. It isn’t exactly clear why the Americans and much of the world appear so confused about something so palpably obvious.
Indeed, this unilateral terror ideology of “new thinking” was even aptly summed up by Vladimir Putin, President of Russia, in these laconic but penetrating words in an unusual moment of candor in 2007:
“what is a unipolar world? However one might embellish this term, at the end of the day it refers to one type of situation, namely one centre of authority, one centre of force, one centre of decision-making. It is world in which there is one master, one sovereign. And at the end of the day this is pernicious not only for all those within this system, but also for the sovereign itself because it destroys itself from within.”
Yes sir, give us ordinary peoples – those who are continually made to suffer this “new thinking” – the “sublime irony” of being “locked in a careful balance of terror” any day!
And that, is also the only rational way out from crossing the nuclear Rubicon!
Unless Russia and China get their act together, unless Pakistan wakes up from its suicidal slumber, and they unite to safeguard the Asian portion of Eurasia in a mutual defense treaty similar to NATO, nuclear holocaust awaits the ‘lesser’ humanity. Perhaps this is how population reduction is ultimately planned amidst orchestrated food shortages as per some secret clauses that haven’t yet been declassified in NSSM 200 and NSDM 314 (or in some other undisclosed National Security Strategy calculus derivatives).
If these resource and population rich Asian nations don’t band together now like the EU is banding together into a unified federation of Europe with common laws and common security, and like the North American Union that is clandestinely transpiring under the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP), after the nuclear genie is unleashed and the United States is under martial law, the barbarians will be knocking at each of the other doors one after another – for total perpetual war is the blatantly obvious global agenda to “birth-pang” the New World Order out of the ashes of humanity!
‘Bin Laden’: Key enabler of “imperial mobilization” (and the first nuclear attack since 1945, on Iran–Pakistan)
April 17, 2008
The abominable shared fates that unite Iran (“Bush and Iran, again”, WSJ April 15, 2008), and Pakistan, from President Bush calling Pakistan “Terror Central” in 2007, to this week, April 13, 2008, ‘clairvoyantly’ asserting that “If another September 11 style attack is being planned, it probably is being plotted in Pakistan, and not Afghanistan”. And as already noted in its March 29, 2008 heads-up warning to America by Project HumanbeingsfirstTM (“Nuclear attack on Iran appears imminent!”), when such a “planned” attack transpires, it “will make Sept. 11 pale by comparison” (Bush, Feb. 13, 2008).
That heads-up warning also suggested creating a new peoples institutional barrier against the wanton pursuit of “imperial mobilization” that is otherwise almost trivially enabled by any “new Pearl Harbor” (“How to derail ‘imperial mobilization’”). Simultaneously, a rational preemptive self-defense strategy to further deter such Machiavellianly orchestrated “’defensive’ US military action” (Brzezinski, Feb. 1, 2007) was also spelled out for the Pakistani ruling elite by Project Humanbeingsfirst in its December 21, 2007 wakeup call (“Wakeup to the grotesque reality of the ‘Grand Chessboard’!”).
Neither heads-up warnings are very un-obvious, and both set-ups have been long time in the making, from even before “Inside Iran’s Secret War for Iraq”, Time August 15, 2005, which followed on the heels of the famous “all options are on the table”, to Bush speech, Jan 10, 2007, to “Iran’s secret plan”, Guardian, May 22 2007, to Petraeus’ finally holding up the ‘smoking gun’ on April 09, 2008. And yet, remarkably, no visible rational self-defense is transpiring.
With the American President’s now exact statements on Pakistan, which seem to be the culmination of systematically built-up statements on both Iran and Pakistan from American military commanders and intelligence chiefs over the past years, it should be obvious to even the biggest dunces in Pakistan that another (nuclear) terrorist event anywhere in the world, will directly be blamed upon Pakistan (and Iran). With NATO and American troops already amassed at its borders in significant numbers to take the plunge into Pakistan en flying-route to Tehran at a moments notice from the White House, there will be absolutely no time after crossing the tipping point in America which “will make Sept. 11 pale by comparison”.
And yet, it is necessary to emphasize again, no effective self-defense by any victim is transpiring, as beleaguered Iran is left standing alone by the world to become the next meal of “primacy” of the ‘Hectoring Hegemons‘.
It is evident that the Pakistani leadership is entirely co-opted into systematically suiciding that nation by its prancing about at the “unbirthday party” with the “Mad Hatter” for the past eight years.  Today it appears entirely natural that the United States should just walk right in to ‘save’ the Pakistanis from the ‘radical islamists’. This was quite unimaginable just a few years ago, but every grotesque bomb blast, every few dozen peoples killed in it, every act of extreme violence, political violence, demonstrations, and uncertainty created by ‘loose nukes’ mantras, culminating in the grotesque assassination of Benazir Bhutto,  now makes it the most natural next step for the “truly global superpower”. A deliberate orchestration of “revolutionary times” in Pakistan to make “what is inconceivable in normal times possible in revolutionary times”.
‘Why’ is rather obvious once again. But for those who do not bother to study the “primacy” craftsmanship of the ‘hectoring hegemons’, it is about the repartitioning of Pakistan to primarily create an independent and geostrategically significant ‘Baluchistan’ nation – much like Kosovo’s orchestrated independence from Serbia – while finally de-nuking Pakistan! This is only the phase-1 of the repartition plan through violently induced “birth pangs of a new Middle East”, whereby, “whatever we do we have to be certain that we’re pushing forward to the new Middle East not going back to the old one.” (Rice, July 21, 2006)
See for instance, the Bernard Lewis Plan for the New Middle East,  or the similar Lieutenant-Colonel Ralph Peters’ map for the New Middle East,  in order to understand what “pushing forward” looks like in the minds of the ‘hectoring hegemons’.  The key point to note is not the precise new boundary lines, or its merits, but that there should be any new boundary lines forcibly drawn by anyone other than willingly by the peoples who live in these regions!
And today, the superpower is increasingly making higher levels of intrusive demands as a prelude to complete take over, as in Iraq, from allowing its citizen-staff to enter Pakistan at anytime on merely the American driver’s license as identification (dispensing with visa and passport), to the point of now having a military liaison into Pakistan’s Nuclear Command Authority from the American Embassy in Islamabad (See “US goes for the jugular in Pakistan”, The Times of India, April 15, 2008). The invasion of both Iran and Pakistan are to be lock-step, as presciently outlined in the December 21, 2007 Wakeup call to the Pakistani ruling elite,  which followed on the heels of an earlier very detailed Open Letter to a Pakistani General by Project Humanbeingsfirst (see “Re-Imagining Pakistan’s Defenses”, November 30, 2007). But nothing.
No newsmedia in Pakistan picked any of these warnings to print, nor did any of the famed columnists who fill the pages of Pakistani newspapers dared to comment on it publicly in their own columns.
The United States public too has been so dexterously primed with the multi-faceted mantras crafted of the “sudden threat or challenge to the public’s sense of domestic well-being”, that the latest public survey by Gallup Poll released on March 31, 2008, shows “Iran topped the list, with 25 percent naming it when asked which country is the greatest U.S. Enemy,”.  And this “enemy” is going to spring Martial law in America, sooner rather than later.  Needless to say, none of the American newsmedia, including both NYT and LAT, have bothered to print any of Project Humanbeingsfirst’s analyses. It is crucially important to state this now because soon, after the tipping point is crossed, or perhaps after the nuclear Rubicon is crossed, both nations’ newsmedia will come screaming “eureka”, ex post facto! Or perhaps it will be the historians!
In order to continually remind the deftly primed American and Western public that all this is indeed pre-meditated Orwellian orchestration of “imperial mobilization” and not just mere happenstance in reaction to chaotically unfolding global events due to GWOT  against some super-resourceful ‘Islamist pirates’ hiding in the Hindu Kush mountains  in Pakistan’s border regions from whence, the absurdity of the immanent threat to the armed to the teeth superpower is today, April 17, 2008, noted as “Elevated”, it is educational to revisit Zbigniew Brzezinski and thank him for explaining the imperial insights and superpower aspirations so unabashedly in ‘The Grand Chessboard’. If only the people in America would read their own ‘Mein Kampfs‘  and try to appreciate the “full spectrum” institutional frameworks of the mighty state under which it is being deployed:
“It is also a fact that America is too democratic at home to be autocratic abroad. This limits the use of America’s power, especially its capacity for military intimidation. Never before has a populist democracy attained international supremacy. But the pursuit of power is not a goal that commands popular passion, except in conditions of a sudden threat or challenge to the public’s sense of domestic well-being. The economic self-denial (that is defense spending), and the human sacrifice (casualties even among professional soldiers) required in the effort are uncongenial to democratic instincts. Democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization.”
“Public opinion polls suggest that only a small minority (13 percent) of Americans favor the proposition that ‘as the sole remaining superpower, the US should continue to be the preeminent world leader in solving international problems’. … Moreover, as America becomes an increasingly multicultural society, it may find it more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues, except in the circumstance of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat. …. More generally, cultural change in America may also be uncongenial to the sustained exercise abroad of genuinely imperial power. That exercise requires a high degree of doctrinal motivation, intellectual commitment, and patriotic gratification. … Mass communications have been playing a particularly important role in that regard, generating a strong revulsion against any selective use of force that entails even low levels of casualties.”
And thus all can see just how effectively “Mass communications have been playing a particularly important role in that regard”; and based on the sociological insights into power and the “populist” impediments to its supreme flaunting, just how effectively mass communications have been utilized to co-opt the “democratic instincts” of the American public (see “Iran, the Associated Press, and Covert-War of ‘Imperial Mobilization’”). And as this LA Times oped “Target: Bin Laden” of April 13, 2008, shows, the mainstream American news organizations continue to provide ample space for perpetuating the mythology of Bin Laden as the quintessential boogieman enabler of “imperial mobilization” – from 911 to WMD, and now to Pakistan and Iran – while the FBI itself does not put that name on its own most wanted list in that connection, noting: 
“The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11. Bin Laden has not been formally charged in connection to 9/11.” (Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI, speaking to the Muckraker Report on June 5, 2006.)
The courageous Muckraker, as no more than just an ordinary member of the American civil society, then shows the minimum indignation that is expected from any decent conscionable human being irrespective of their indoctrination level and their belief in the “United we Stand” with the State at the ‘unbirthday party’:
“Through the talking heads in the mainstream media, the Bush Administration told the American people that Usama Bin Laden was Public Enemy Number One and responsible for the deaths of nearly 3000 people on September 11, 2001. Yet nearly five years later, the FBI says that it has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.”
“Remember, on June 5, 2006, FBI spokesman, Chief of Investigative Publicity Rex Tomb said, “The FBI has no hard evidence connecting Usama Bin Laden to 9/11.” This should be headline news worldwide. The challenge to the reader is to find out why it is not. Why has the U.S. media blindly read the government-provided 9/11 scripts, rather than investigate without passion, prejudice, or bias, the events of September 11, 2001? Why has the U.S. media blacklisted any guest that might speak of a government sponsored 9/11 cover-up, rather than seeking out those people who have something to say about 9/11 that is contrary to the government’s account?”
To add to the narrative, the New York Times, rather surprisingly, ran a front-page exposé on Sunday, April 20, 2008, headlined: “Behind TV Analysts, Pentagon’s Hidden Hand”. It has to be read in full in order to appreciate its import – after the fact of course, the invasion of Iraq now being fait accompli. And that is precisely the “important role” of not just the “mass communications”, but also “the doctrinal motivations, intellectual commitment” (Brzezinski) in pursuing the mantra of ‘Bin Laden’ and ‘Al Qaeeda’, for on the heels of a “catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new pearl harbor” (PNAC, page 51), it provides the much needed “patriotic gratification” to enable “imperial mobilization” in a “populist democracy” (Brzezinski), as is now evident.
One cannot ignore the fact that the New York Times itself played its own role dutifully at the time pushing the mantra of WMDs in Iraq, which followed upon the heels of the mantra of ‘Bin Laden’ doing 9/11, and continues to do so even today pushing the new mantra of ‘loose nukes’ that ‘Bin Laden’ and ‘Al Qaeeda’ will hijack, and the mantra of ‘Iranian WMDs’, in order to help synthesize public opinion for the new wars on Iran, Pakistan, and Syria. Ex post facto, even George Bush will write a book detailing his masterful role in constructing the New World Order.
Indeed, Project HumanbeingsfirstTM ‘clairvoyantly’ predicts that the scientific study  finally published in a peer-reviewed Civil Engineering online Journal only this past week, on how the three WTC towers (WTC1, WTC2, and WTC7)  collapsed so suddenly at almost free fall speed as if it were controlled demolition, titled “Fourteen Points of Agreement with official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction”, ever gains mainstream traction before the tipping point, it will be attempted to be blamed upon ‘Bin Laden’.
It will be asserted by newsmedia, by the Pentagon, the White House, and by the scholars and technicians of ’empire’, that the only obvious candidate who had the capability to pull off such an outrageous controlled demolition on America, is ‘Bin Laden’ and ‘Al Qaeeda’! When that transpires, I hope that these bastions of ‘ubermensch’ intellect will at least have the sense to get the FBI to first update their most wanted poster of Usama Bin Laden! Its snapshot, taken on April 22, 2008, is archived for the disingenuous “eureka” moment of posterity similar to the one displayed by the afore-stated Sunday NYT, and by the 2005 Iraq Study group, at: http://tinyurl.com/5swdoq. 
It has today become necessary to state blatant obviousness explicitly: All those pushing the mantras of the Pentagon and the White House, regardless of its ‘well argued’ rationales at the time, are active and complicit participants in synthesizing “doctrinal motivations” which span the gamut of manufactured consent, to manufactured dissent.
This criminal priming of the “populist democracy” now naturally enables “the first, only, and last truly global superpower” to be fully “autocratic abroad” in its unlimited “capacity for military intimidation”. Please note how Brzezinski concludes the aspirations of the truly global superpower:
“Geostrategic success in that cause would represent a fitting legacy of America’s role as the first, only, and last truly global superpower.”
And it is precisely in that overarching “Geostrategic … cause”, that Iran and Pakistan are imminently staged on the nuclear chopping block, while some American city is made expendable to create the new “catalyzing event” for “imperial mobilization” that “will make Sept. 11 pale by comparison”.
All conveniently enabled by the continued Orwellian use of the fiction of ‘Bin Laden’ and its various surrogates including ‘Al Qaeeda’. If these stick-wielding cave-dwelling antediluvians possess such awesome powers as to bring down a superpower to its knees, forcing it to spend 3.1 trillion dollars next year a majority of it on defense, and its peoples to lose all their democratic freedoms and civil liberties, then they are surely more powerful than the USSR! Or at least, a wonderful ‘Ali Baba’ bedtime story. I used to invent such tales while putting my kids to bed when they were younger, and in my stories, the ‘Ali Baba’ was a Herculean Mr. Good-deeds and Mother Teresa rolled into one – flying off to far away places on his magic carpet with his band of 40 (along with his wife and children who were, only co-incidentally, named after my own), and with his awesome powers of Superman, solving all the problems of the world. But I think the ’empire’s’ rendition of ‘Ali Baba’ is more effective for “imperial mobilization”.
It is pointless debating and dissecting the ever changing ‘leaves of the tree’ in the battlefields of conquests (as in this battlefield analysis ‘Iran should be “Set Up for an Attack”‘)  when the matters are plainly manifest in its DNA, and in the illegality, by international law, of “goosestep[ping] the Herrenvolk across international frontiers” (see “The attack of ‘Al-Qaeeda’ and Pakistani ‘loose nukes’” and “Nuremberg: The grotesquely dancing trumpeting elephant in the newlywed’s bed!”).
It would do well for the few remaining sane and conscionable peoples in America, its handful of un co-opted media persons, politicians, thinkers, peace activists and others who care about their nation and seek to effectively overturn the hydra of “full spectrum dominance”, to stay focussed on the DNA of the ‘tree’: the “supreme international crime” that is the alpha and omega of the matter.
It is the prima facie all encompassing harbinger of “all the evil that follows”, as defined at Nuremberg, and so must remain the necessary and sufficient first focus for stopping “imperial mobilization” by unequivocally charging it as “the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole”. Further analysis of its vagaries in various battlefields of conquest is superfluous when the highest order bit is to stop it before the nuclear Rubicon is crossed. If the conscionable peoples in the world and their national leaderships cannot even unite in the definition of what is crime, and what is the “supreme” crime, and cannot channel their collective energies to a single point of focus on deterring the “supreme international crime”, matters are already fait accompli.
The essay is fully referenced with embedded links in the original source. Only a few essential ones are footnoted below:
 Zahir Ebrahim, The attack of ‘Al-Qaeeda’ and Pakistani ‘loose nukes’ : A peek into the creation and execution of mantras as pretexts for War of ‘Imperial Mobilization’ – and the basis for its legal containment, April 12, 2008, http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2008/04/alqaeeda-loose-nukes-pakistan.html
 Zahir Ebrahim, Who Killed Benazir Bhutto? In her own words! February 04, 2008, http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2008/02/who-killed-benazir-bhutto-herownwords.html
 Bush-Cheney Heading For Nuclear Rendevous At Desert One, Webster Griffin Tarpley, August 27, 2005 http://www.rense.com/general67/heading.htm
 Plans for Redrawing the Middle East: The Project for a “New Middle East”, Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya, November 18, 2006, http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=NAZ20061116&articleId=3882
 Zahir Ebrahim, Wakeup to the grotesque reality of the ‘Grand Chessboard’! December 21, 2007 http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2007/12/wakeup-grotesque-reality-grand.html
 Poll: Iran, Iraq, China Top U.S. ‘Enemies’ List, March 31, 2008 http://cbs5.com/watercooler/us.enemies.poll.2.688626.html
 Bush Replaced REX84 With New Martial Law EO Once In Control – Martial Law Will Stay, Ted Twietmeyer, April 14, 2008, http://rense.com/general81/shadowgovt.htm
 Washington Post, Iraq and the Special Theory of Relativity, Dana Milbank, Wednesday, April 9, 2008 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/08/AR2008040803325_pf.html
 Los Angeles Times, Target: Bin Laden, April 13, 2008, http://articles.latimes.com/2008/apr/13/opinion/op-coll13
 Zahir Ebrahim, Prisoners of the Cave, 2003, Introduction, http://prisonersofthecave.blogspot.com/2007/04/introduction.html
 Project Censored, #16 No Hard Evidence Connecting Bin Laden to 9/11 in Top 25 Censored Stories for 2008, http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/16-no-hard-evidence-connecting-bin-laden-to-9-11/
 For all 911 research related finally published papers of Jones, Gage, Ryan, Legge et. al., see http://www.journalof911studies.com/
 FBI Most Wanted: http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/terrorists/terbinladen.htm
Snapshot of April 12, 2008: http://humanbeingsfirst.files.wordpress.com/2008/04/fbi-most-wanted-terrorist-usama-bin-laden-april-22-2008.pdf
 Examples of inconsequential profundity which predominate the Western dissent discourse: http://www.atlargely.com/2008/04/when-did-iran-s.html and http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=MIR20080415&articleId=8698
The attack of ‘Al-Qaeeda’ and Pakistani ‘loose nukes’ : A peek into the creation and execution of mantras as pretexts for War of ‘Imperial Mobilization’ – and the basis for its legal containment
April 12, 2008
It is beyond any reasonable comprehension how blatantly obvious the grotesquely unfolding reality in Pakistan is (see “Profound Clairvoyance or Blatant Obviousness?”), and yet the Pakistani rulers and the majority of Pakistani ruling elite and its newsmedia still manifestly react as if they are all sitting at the ‘unbirthday’ tea-party with the ‘Mad Hatter’ boisterously chanting the imperial ‘war on terror’ song as they deliberately suicide the nation into oblivion. There isn’t much time.
This ominous report “2 die in Pakistan nuclear plant accident” (AP April 08, 2008) will shortly be blamed by the West upon the ubiquitous ‘al qaeeda’ as having attempted, and perhaps even succeeded in, getting their hands on the Pakistani ‘loose nukes’. Unlike the Benazir Bhutto assassination that the Government of Pakistan had immediately blamed upon the ‘al qaeeda’ (see “Who Killed Benazir Bhutto? In her own words!”) with copious help from the Pakistani newsmedia (see “Letters to Editors”), this time around, both will surely deny it (irrespective of the facts of the matter which will remain top-secret and continually lied about, subjecting the peoples and the environment in its vicinity to possible radioactive harm; even widespread harm).
If (rather when) this diabolical ‘Al-Qaeeda’ spin ever materializes in the Western press, be forewarned that the crossing of the nuclear Rubicon which already appears imminent (see “Nuclear Attack on Iran appears imminent!”) despite what President George Bush might state publicly, is very close at hand!
For, of course, the immense premeditated build-up for invasion and subsequent “’defensive’ US military action” (Brzezinski), must all be made to look un-premeditated. This will of course get little assistance from the ever fertile Straussian minds of the editorial writers who get no free hand in the American press and the newsmedia (sic!), all of which follow the New York Times construction of “all the news that’s fit to print”.
And just as abhorrently, this would surely indicate that the new ‘911’, which according to President Bush, “will make Sept. 11 pale by comparison” (NYT Feb. 14, 2008) and that “it would be the work of militants hiding inside Pakistan” (The News April 12, 2008), is also imminent.
But multiple diabolical catalyst provocations such as the loss of the 5th fleet in the Persian Gulf, justifying full spectrum “’defensive’ US military action against Iran” and Pakistan as forewarned by Project HumanbeingsfirstTM in its wakeup call of December 21, 2007 (see “Wakeup to the grotesque reality of the Grand Chessboard’”) aren’t precluded in this calculus of the Fourth Reich for “imperial mobilization”.
‘An “aggressor,” Jackson proposed to the [Nuremberg] tribunal, is a state that is the first to commit such actions as “invasion of its armed forces, with or without a declaration of war, of the territory of another State. …
If certain acts of violation of treaties are crimes, they are crimes whether the United States does them or whether Germany does them, and we are not prepared to lay down a rule of criminal conduct against others which we would not be willing to have invoked against us.” ‘
Indeed, it is further pertinent to refresh one’s imperial memory that the United States Chief Prosecutor at Nuremberg Tribunals had gone on to establish that the overt-acts of aggression, and not the tortuous justifications behind these acts, is what hung the Nazis:
“The intellectual bankruptcy and moral perversion of the Nazi regime might have been no concern of international law had it not been utilized to goosestep the Herrenvolk across international frontiers. It is not their thoughts, it is their overt acts which we charge to be crimes.”
And that these overt-acts of aggression, as argued by Justice Jackson, contained within them the accumulation of “all the evil that follows”. That, the first primal aggression was:
“the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole”.
Thusly, all of the murderous turmoil unleashed in Pakistan since the macho ‘commando’ President General Musharraf committed the client-state to America’s “goosestep[ping] the Herrenvolk across international frontiers”, and the concomitant apportioning of commensurate “supreme” blame for the horrendous toll upon its ‘wretched’ society, as elsewhere, including Afghanistan and Iraq, Lebanon, and soon in Iran, accordingly, accrues to the account of the sole superpower.
And it will so construct another more devastating “new pearl harbor” once again as the grotesque re-charging of the worn-out “catalyst” for continuing on with its premeditated nuclear plan to “Birth pang” the “Project for a New Middle East”.
This time around, it’s destination Tehran via Islamabad. And quite un-cleverly disguised as “’defensive US military action”. But at the ‘unbirthday’ party, everything absurd becomes reality!
The Pakistani ‘loose nukes’ hijacked by the cave-dwelling, stick-wielding, suicide-bombing, ‘Al-Qaeeda’ mantra is among the multiple facile absurdities being deftly primed (and black-ops synthesized) as already outlined in the afore-stated wakeup call. It is one thing for the press and politicians in the pockets of the ‘Hectoring Hegemons’ (PNAC) to be rehearsing this silly as part of their “intellectual commitment” to seeding “doctrinal motivation” for the ‘retaliatory’ “patriotic gratification” (Brzezinski). It is quite another for the victims themselves to be bizarrely echoing it. This is yet to be observed in primal nature: lambs arguing for their own slaughter.
Those who naively think that these complicated matters can’t be pre-meditated or pre-planned precisely because of the insanity of it, or the incomprehensibility of it in being pulled off in any kind of military precision that’s needed, delude themselves for their prized mental acuity, for the hectoring hegemons’ is exponentially greater.
This ‘ubermensch’ breed clearly perceives that “what is inconceivable in normal times is possible in revolutionary times”. It is only in the pain of “Birth-Pangs”, as for any new birth in nature, that the ‘New World Order’ can be born. The Third Reich wanted it – and failed. The Fourth Reich wants it just as bad, and are indeed playing their game well.
The “Mission Accomplished” sign actually meant what it stated. While most in the mainstream, as well as in the so called ‘dissent-stream’, derided it in the aftermath of Iraq, little do these gentle-minds perceive the diabolical agenda that was accomplished quite successfully indeed – to set the “Birth-pangs” and labor pains in motion by raping the fertile womb.
That was surely successfully accomplished! One might even wager that it was William Kristol who likely came up with that sign – he seems to be just the type to relish in such devilish play on words (judging from his previous forays into Presidential speech-writing). It can be quite educational to back-read all the Presidential speeches since 2000 and study up on their craftsmen. The Goebbelian craftsmanship creates a Kafkaesque hypnotism over the American masses and its newsmedia.
It is precisely that ‘ubermenschen’ power that eludes normal peoples who simply can’t perceive the depth of evil incarnate which once again besieges mankind. This is why, Leo Strauss, the legatee of the Austrio-Hungarian empire that had seeded Hitler, also only seeded the new ‘ubermenschen’ into the privileged Nietzscheian class of being ‘beyond good and evil’ after assurance of their higher intelligence and superiority. As per Plato’s philosophy of the philosopher-king wisely shepherding the flock, Straussians merely drop the ‘wisely’ part. They, in effect, replace it with ‘predatorily’. Thus the self-ascribed appellation ‘Hectoring Hegemons‘.
Such tortuous minds only make tortuous plans that just the sheer boldness of which boggles some moral mind.
It certainly boggles Noam Chomsky’s mind – supposedly, the “arguably most important intellectual alive” in all of Western Hemisphere according to the New York Times – that to this day he cannot believe the evidence of his own eyes that the ‘911’ was controlled demolition, and hence by corollary, must have been self-inflicted. He continues to accept the Pentagon’s narrative that a guy in the Hindu Kush mountains with cell-phones and box-cutters took down the entire trillion dollar defense system of the world’s sole superpower. A fabricated war that is no more abstruse than the Star Wars Hollywood movie episode “Revenge of the Sith”, eludes him as he continually expands on the ‘Al qaeeda’ and ‘OBL’ merely seeking revenge for all the horrible crimes of the ’empire’. And he does so after writing almost a million words in a zillion books over half a century about the ex post facto secretive crimes of ’empire’, the various magical incantations of its power, and the unraveling of its deception games. It was in the greatest honor of my esteemed professor that I wrote “Responsibility of Intellectuals – Redux” on the 40th anniversary last year of the original’s seminal publication. I wonder that if Noam Chomsky had been a non-Jewish German Professor of linguistics living in the Third Reich, would he also have accepted the Reich’s explanation of its self-inflicted Operation Canned Goods and the Reichstag fire?
Indeed, if the U.S. Chief Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunals Prosecutor Justice Robert Jackson were alive today, and he hadn’t merely been handing out a ‘victor’s justice’ to the despicable harbingers of the Third Reich when he stated the blatant obviousness of their premeditated intent to commit “supreme international crime” of aggression:
“The plans of Adolf Hitler for aggression were just as secret as Mein Kampf, of which over six million copies were published in Germany”,
he would blanketly also re-assert to the equally despicable harbingers of the Fourth Reich the equally blatant obviousness of their premeditated intent to re-commit the same “supreme international crime” of aggression:
The plans of the aggressor for aggression were just as secret as the ‘PNAC’ and the ‘NPR’ on the ‘Grand Chessboard’ that were freely available for download on the Internet, and in major bookstores.
The only difference between the two, as far as anyone can un-emotionally ascertain, and which is amply documented by this scribe, is that the Nazis didn’t get the opportunity to re-write history as the present day ‘ubermenschen’ are busily engaged in doing, with willing connivance of their intellectuals, newspaper editorial writers, various and sundry lower order newsmedia ‘circus clowns’, even expert ‘native informants‘.
Furthermore, most obviously, this time around, the vast majority of the Jews and the handful of mastermind Judeofascists among them, are the Reich’s best friends, aiders, supporters, sympathizers, and even its overarching master strategists, instead of the object of its wrath! The handful of courageous and inspiring exceptions, gadflies, and men and women of uncommon chutzpah, duly noted.
And finally, the Third Reich never enjoyed the “full spectrum dominance” and un-opposed uni-polar supremacy that enables the present Reich to exert its “Primacy and Geostrategic Imperatives” unfettered and unchallenged as “one centre of authority, one centre of force, one centre of decision-making, … one master, one sovereign.” (Putin)
With this blatant reality in their faces, the Pakistani rulers can no more claim the ‘I didn’t know’ defense, that, ‘oops, we were fooled that this fabricated “war on terror” was real, and we only accidentally wrecked havoc upon our nation – we really only had good intentions as we bombed all those whom we thought were nasty “terrorists” ‘, any more than the Nazis could for their crimes upon their own disfavored citizenry.
Eichmann in Jerusalem, in his trial, even lent new meaning to the “I was only following orders” mantra, which subsequently became enshrined worldwide as not an excuse to commit crimes against humanity. Most of the former, as well as the newly elected senior Pakistani government leaders and their respective political party senior leadership, not to forget the uniform, will equally hang someday for all the innocent red blood of their own peoples that they have already shed by supporting the American fiction of ‘war on terror’.
But they can certainly stop now before more blood apportions to their soul!
Surely in the ‘land of the pure’ – all believe in a ‘soul’? Even Hitler did (“Gott Mit Uns”). And President George Bush surely does too – for by his own admission:
“God told me to strike at al-Qaida and I struck them, and then he instructed me to strike at Saddam, which I did, and now I am determined to solve the problem in the Middle East”!
SO WAKE THE HELL UP AND ACT before his god tells him to ‘nookular’ strike Pakistan and Iran to solve our problems too. His god loves “’defensive’ US military action”.
And as per the Muslim’s God – one may yet have a reprieve of one’s soul if one paid ‘blood money’ and fair compensation for inflicting cataclysmic pain and suffering, to the victims’ families. It is most assuredly a win-win situation before the inevitable ‘oops, too late!’ In fact, not urgently acting in accordance with the grotesque reality that is unfortunately only visible on the ‘Grand Chessboard’ when ‘Alice’ is wide awake, is a sure lose-lose proposition.
THE SOLUTION-SPACE: The only mechanism outside of the United States of America to arrest its “supreme international crime” of “imperial mobilization” in its tracks*, is either: the SCO immediately transforms into a NATO-like ‘attack on one, attack on all’ military alliance that includes Iran and Pakistan – which is of course not in the control of the Pakistanis – to construct a détente on the ‘Grand Chessboard’; or, the Pakistani rulers urgently implement the strategy outlined in the afore-stated wakeup call. The latter is eminently under the control of the Pakistani ruling elite – to take back this ‘wretched’ nation from the blood-soaked hands of the ‘hectoring hegemons’. And to do it with such astute political ascendance that it inevitably ends up forcing the much needed stalemate on the ‘Grand Chessboard’. A task for which Creation itself bestowed the instincts of collective self-defense.
It is the only effective antidote to Zbigniew Brzezinski’s ‘ubermensch’ truism: “Hegemony is as old as mankind.” But the mastermind has certainly also understood that predatory instincts for “primacy” are far older, and so is its full spectrum deterrence, as once again amply reminded by nature itself in this immensely popular 8-minute internet video “Battle at Kruger”.
Let history be witness, if there is anyone left to write it (accurately), that none of this was un-obvious at the time.
* For ‘checkmate’ by a peoples within the United States, see “How to derail ‘imperial mobilization’”
Footnote: The essay is fully referenced with embedded links in the original source which are not reproduced here.
Letter to Sibel Edmonds on ‘Pakistan’s Bomb, U.S. Cover-up’
March 18, 2008
To: The courageous Sibel Edmonds (via email)
Founder, National Security Whistleblowers Coalition,
Alexandria, VA 22320.
March 18, 2008.
Dear Ms. Sibel Edmonds,
I chanced upon your work today from Daniel Ellsberg’s essay “Pakistan’s Bomb, U.S. Cover-up” (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7884), and followed up on some of your fascinating disclosures and courageous efforts.
First of all, please accept a humble ‘keep your chin up’ message of encouragement and gratitude from Project Humanbeingsfirst. Just as Rachel Corrie had to stand up to the bulldozer (http://humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2008/03/reremembering-rachel-corrie-2008.html), you too are surely driven by the same compulsion for truth and justice to stand up to another colossus ‘bulldozer’, but I hope with more efficacious and certainly more pleasanter outcome. There is however, always a price to pay for an awakened conscience. Thanks for being a tremendous role model for other conscientious denizens of the world. As Daniel Ellsberg – the ‘mother’ of all whistleblowers – states, and as your founding of the NSWBC.org encourages, I too humbly hope that other whistleblowers in the ‘know’ do not wait but come out directly to the public on such crucial matters of monumental criminality when they suspect treason and lies being told to subvert the populist notion of the ‘American way’. Especially, to prevent the impending nuclear attack on Iran under variously contrived pretexts (A, B). To the credit of this nation whose worthy citizen you are, such ‘outings’ and quests for truth and justice are still only possible in this country despite your onerous struggles to this effect. Which is why, I also still continue to live in this nation as a permanent resident despite being a citizen of Pakistan. If you are interested, you may read a bit about me here.
Secondly, and more to the point, this letter is mainly about the interpretation you have given to the facts that you discovered. It is not about your long and horrendous ordeal in getting the U.S. Government and the newsmedia to acknowledge that you indeed did speak truthfully about your discoveries and of your experiences and ordeals while attempting to bring them to light as a patriotic and concerned citizen.
The following observation by Daniel Ellsberg in his essay pointing out your work is intriguing:
‘ … various American journalists in the last weeks have reportedly received calls from “intelligence sources” hinting that “what Sibel Edmonds stumbled onto” is not a rogue operation by American officials and congressmen working to their own advantage — as believed by Edmonds and some other former or active FBI officials — but a sensitive covert operation authorized at high levels. … ‘
Indeed, the absence of this sense from your own writings, public disclosures, and the recent Times articles, in itself is intriguing to me. As one close to the investigations and to the ‘gagged’ data, i.e., being an informed insider, and also surely far better well versed than most among the public with the notion captured in this pithy saying of a former CIA counter intelligence chief (of over 2 decades) “deception is a state of mind and the mind of the state”, why is this line of inquiry missing from your own public assessments of your discoveries in the FBI recordings and in its files?
The consistent impression one gets from your articulations of your profound discoveries is one of mercenarial ‘criminal rogue operators’. The Times article of January 8, 2008, too is sensationally titled “For sale: West’s deadly nuclear secrets”. Looking at ‘Iran-Contra’ in the same light (had such data been available) would certainly have led to an altogether different conclusion space. Whereas in reality, as known to all and sundry today, it was an officially sanctioned White House covert-policy to get Iran and Iraq to fight it out by arming them both in order to neutralize and contain the Iranian people’s revolution, ‘plausible deniability’ and Presidential pardons among the guilty at the highest levels not notwithstanding. And what were these pardons for when it all unraveled? Not for devilishly getting two nations to fight and the fratricidal death of a million Muslims on both sides. But for subverting US laws that precluded officially sending arms to Iran. So a convoluted covert method for doing it was crafted, and when it unraveled, that was determined to be the only crime in the matter for which the criminals were later pardoned! You can perhaps not sense the outrage among the peoples of the world at the hubris of the world’s most autocratic and diabolical superpower – that its secretive foreign policy calculus of setting up two nations to fight each other to death is never questioned in the Congressional inquiry or in the newsmedia, but only on the method used to arm one of the foes. That is how the underlying envelope of ‘legality’ is defined for you. And that is also how ‘rogue’ versus ‘kosher’ is delineated. This aspect is revisited again in the concluding paragraphs of this letter to bring out the key meta question to pursue as the highest order bit of the matter in order to achieve real, measurable, and enduring change from your immense effort to speak out which is already surely at great personal cost to you.
But to the point here, in your case too, such a rational conclusion-space seems inescapable as well, that what you have discovered are merely the covert leaves of an officially sanctioned foreign policy calculus rooted in the DNA of hubris and conquest on the ‘Grand Chessboard’. Especially by the weight of your own testimony of consistent thwarting of the official investigations that happened multiple times, across multiple agencies, including within your own, and still continues to happen to this day across the board to the point that “… the FBI took the highly unusual step of retroactively classifying information it gave to Congress two years ago about the Sibel Edmonds case” (CBS). The fact that small sums of money are changing hands may be the clever red herring learnt from the unraveling of ‘Iran Contra’. Please permit me to explore this single aspect in some depth in the rest of the letter.
What are the chances that all of a sudden, so many simultaneous ‘treasonous peoples‘ materialized in the USA on this very matter on which the National Security Apparatus of the world’s sole superpower spends a trillion dollars every couple of years in its defense budget, and which is the crown jewels [of its nuclear primacy] that enables it to become the ‘hectoring hegemon‘ in the world [under the stewardship of the very same ‘treasonous’ peoples]?
And what is the probability that it is a deliberate, multi-tiered, overarching, compartmentalized covert-ops that transcends Administrations based on perhaps an unwritten or highly and deeply classified foreign policy principle – as the real powers and architects behind all of the Administrations largely remain the same in an institutionalized revolving door consisting of Administration, Academe, Military, Think-Tanks, and sometimes Corporation board rooms?
Just as one illustrative example of enduring policies and long lived strategic policy craftsmen across multiple Administrations, witness Zbigniew Brzezinski laying out the ‘chess moves’ on the ‘Grand Chessboard‘: serving as National Security Advisor to a Democrat President while “giving to the USSR its Vietnam War”, and then advising and guiding the subsequent Republican and Democrat Administrations equally in continuation of the ‘chess moves’, all of which are entirely blue-printed by him in his remarkable 1996 book. Its strategies for “imperial mobilization” to maintain “American Primacy” seem to have been adopted in its entirety by the present Administration, and is likely to remain the guiding policy aspect of the overarching American Foreign Policy calculus in the near term no matter who comes to occupy the living quarters in the White House. This is really no different from the so called ‘Truman Doctrine’ which ran the American Foreign Policy calculus during the hey day of Communism for over four decades after World War II. Have you had an opportunity to examine ‘Operation Gladio‘ (pdf here), to appreciate the depth of devilishly orchestrated, often convoluted, compartmentalized layerings that are possible in long term covert-ops when instrumented under overarching covert-policy principles?
Thus please permit me to ask whether you considered examining your data and conducting your forensic analysis in the light of this perspective of unraveling the multi-tiered and highly complex calculus of the geostrategic chessgame of an ’empire’? If not, then why not. If you have done so, then why is it missing in your public exposition?
Why do you base your entire comprehension of the snippets of data that you have so far gleaned as only a ‘rogue’ operation? There must surely be some rational and convincingly arguable reason for your perspective. What is it? The missing ‘pink panther glove’ to prove that it was officially sanctioned covert-ops? That will never be found – and surely you must know that! In case you are interested, this issue is fleshed out in some detail in http://humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2007/03/dialog-among-civilizations-whytalksfail.html.
It is easy to forget that whatever one may learn of secretive ‘contemporary history’ as it unfolds in near ‘realtime’, is likely only a tiny slice, a snapshot, a fragment, or multiple fragments, of a much bigger highly ‘compartmentalized’ picture, especially when it pertains to ‘national security’, covert-ops, and “imperial mobilization”. I am surely pushing an open door here and preaching to the choir when I utter this self-evident bit of truism. However, it forms an essential underlying axiom, often unarticulated and ignored, of accurate and rational ‘model building’ to comprehend hidden and secretive overarching compartmentalized realities based on fragmentary and often misleading or misinterpreted data acquired from manifest reality – the modus operandi and starting premise of all good forensic detectives – despite the attendant trail of deliberately cultivated red herrings and bread crumbs.
As you will surely agree, higher the level of the secretive nature of covert-ops and greater its criminality (moral or legal), and longer the planning and execution horizon, greater and more convoluted are the red herrings surrounding them to keep the public (and other branches of the bureaucracy) from discovering the big picture while the covert-ops are still ‘hot’. This modus operandi of cloaking secrets in sophisticated deception is often referred to as the ‘technique of infamy‘ as you surely already must know. Why ignore it in your forensic analysis of your discoveries? Why could red herrings also not be planted to mislead other agencies of the Government in case something prematurely blows up in an ultra-high sensitivity global intelligence covert-ops in the geostrategic policy-plane that is to transcend Administrations and is designed to possibly create covert proxy wars and mayhem against powerful foes in the future?
The following is what leads me to think that your interpretation of these recorded conversations and its extrapolation to the bigger picture that America’s nuclear secrets were being sold, may be a red herring deliberately set up to be interpreted that way if exposed. For fundamentally, you are echoing your theories in the backdrop of the same official narratives of the Pentagon and the White House, that there is a rogue network, that there is the ‘al qaeeda’, and that America is threatened by external enemies who perpetrated 9/11. Thus you are accomplishing two things simultaneously. One, lending credence to the official narrative of the threat to America being from external outlaw ‘pirates’, and two, swallowing their decoy. The first point is not addressed in this letter further. Please see Webster Tarpley’s book “9/11 Synthetic Terror” (pdf) for a good analysis of how such an external terror threat might be a complete fabrication, and that the real enemy might well be within, or see Michel Chossudovsky’s website http://globalresearch.ca, or see my rather plebeian book “Prisoners of the Cave” that examines it from the lens of Zbigniew Brzezinski’s book ‘the Grand Chessboard’. Please permit me however to point out a few anomalies for the second aspect as a reality check based on my limited experience.
The monies you mention changing hands is really pocket change, almost as if a couple of zeros are missing. Why would senior career administration folks jeopardize their good name for petty cash – regardless of the country they are from? Why would diplomats risk their own daughters in covert-ops? I don’t see George Bush or Dick Cheney risk theirs. Why would you think that people in other nations love themselves and their kin any less? You evidently seem to have little idea how trivial it is for most recipients of American aid or World Bank loans to repeatedly skim several billion dollars from the top. Or how the state’s apparatus rewards its operatives and supporters in developing nations like Pakistan and Turkey with unaccountable military governments having a free hand over the national treasury and public commons. They can trivially loot with both hands, and quite legally too – since the military (or the dictator du jour in civilian clothes) pretty much dictates the laws to the parliament! Yes a few zeroes are indeed missing to make these amounts even sound tempting. There are far easier ways for them to make far larger amounts of monies than to be stealing secrets from the world’s most shockingly powerful superpower in its own den that is crawling with its sophisticated security apparatus and uncompromisingly patriotic field agents!
Thus, in a nutshell, the motive for doing this risky trade by the Turks for a pecuniary gain is highly suspicious, and less than convincing. Same for the high ranking Americans – they have far too much to lose, and far too much smarts to be caught this way in a phone conversation selling state secrets! These aren’t just ordinary peoples.
Furthermore, if these treasonous operatives are so smart that they can indulge in such covert activities so successfully in the world’s largest security state, and yet be so dumb that they don’t know or have never heard of the NSA, the Echelon system, or that the United States of America runs the largest most extensive intelligence network in the history of civilizations under its DIA [ see signals intelligence in sections 1.11 and 1.12 of EO12333 ] with budgets which run into unaccountable billions of black-ops dollars and with backdoors to almost all secure communication channels to instantly decipher all communications in near realtime (even if a myth but largely believed by most people), and so nonchalantly and openly be speaking of their drops and pickups and using a location that is easy to identify back to their own countries which, despite their diplomatic immunities, can have severe consequences for their nation if found out, is almost akin to the Pentagon and the White House suggesting that “Bin Laden” is so smart and resourceful that it can hijack 4 airliners simultaneously in the air, outwit all of America’s vast air defenses, and run them into tall buildings of the most armed to the teeth superpower nation at 500 mph, and yet be so dumb that his operatives would draw so much attention to themselves the night before the dastardly deed so that anything could go wrong potentially, openly disclose that they didn’t want to learn how to land to their instructors as they learnt how to fly jet airliners only on simulators and have that be needlessly remembered or raise suspicions, and leave well identifiable calling cards behind the day of the crime so that America would know exactly where to drop their retaliatory payloads!
Thus, not to deny that these recordings that you were asked to interpret are genuine, but only to ponder at the nonsequitur conclusions that you have been propounding so energetically which leads one to believe that morons were executing this sophisticated covert-ops for petty cash!
The only rational explanation that credibly explains your discoveries is that these operatives were following policy directives that were agreed to at the highest levels of their respective governments, with assurances and guidance in what they operationally ought to be doing, whether or not each one of them may have known the big picture – most likely not due to rigid compartmentalization of such covert processes which you surely must know much more accurately about than ordinary members of the public brought up on Hollywood.
After the outing of ‘Iran-Contra’ that went straight into unraveling the government’s covertly sanctioned policy at the highest levels, it is much easier to blame pecuniary greed if things ever blow up prematurely. All this blame upon A.Q. Khan under his forced confessional, that his unbridled greed was behind his proliferation network, is the most facile of explanations for it all. He likely had signed blank checks drawn on numbered Swiss accounts in his pockets all through the 1970s until at least the fall of the Berlin Wall – if money is what he wanted, he had plenty of millions by the blessings of his bosses and the magic of carte blanche. But that mercenarial explanation for a pecuniary gain is more useful than the unraveling of the entire official collusion space, and is thus in repeated replay since ‘Iran-Contra’!
Just to play the devil’s advocate to further this analysis, please allow me to ask why the following line of reasoning is so trivially rejectable that it is entirely absent in your analysis: that Pakistan may have been ‘officially’ armed with nuclear technology* as a covert-policy to check India’s (and China’s) advances in the long term on the ‘Grand Chessboard’?
Creating a three-way manipulatable tie-up between China-India-Pakistan in favor of the ‘hectoring hegemons’ can be far more advantageous on the ‘Grand Chessboard’ with a wildcard like Pakistan in the fray. It has the real potential of neutralizing any unexpected threatening alliances between the two most burgeoning challengers to “American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives” by engaging them in proxy-warfare with a nuclear armed client-state next door if the need ever arises!
Pakistan was, after all, largely ‘blessed’ out of the Indian sub-continent deliberately as a patsy client-state on the evolving ‘Grand Chessboard’ of the time by the active collusion and sanction of the waning and the emerging imperial masters of the time! In case you are interested, please see this Open Letter to a Pakistani General to further examine this line of reasoning, written from the perspective of how Pakistan can actually get out of its client-state status to genuinely serve the aspirations of its own long suffering peoples. For indeed, your whistleblowing data also tends to far more rationally support this notion of a deliberate patsy client state being primed on the geostrategic plane in the aftermath of India making its first nuclear explosion in 1974, than a mere ‘rogue operation’ of how Pakistan clandestinely acquired its nuclear weapons in plainsight of the world’s most watchful superpower, and how these might today be conveniently hijacked by the ‘al-qaeeda’ as the famed ‘loose nukes‘ despite being guarded by the world’s 5th largest standing army (see wakeup call at http://Humanbeingsfirst.org).
Certainly, to effectively carry out devious long term covert operations under hegemonic state-doctrines, requires a concert of mercenaries, patsies, moles, and patriotic soldiers, but also ideological masterminds and policy frameworks to strategically guide its execution, and many cloaking devices, red herrings, and psyops to hide the operations. To deny this is to deny the hegemonic history of the United States of America in the face of plenty of ex post facto historical evidence already in plainsight.
And what lends further substance to the idea that a covert ‘official’ sanction may also be the situation in your case, is the almost bipartisan nature of ‘hush ups’ being seamlessly observed here. And if there is any truth to any of this analysis, then it is easy to predict that this ‘hushing up’ will continue into the next Administration, and that what you seek – the public inquiry – will either never be allowed to materialize, or become another “9/11 Commissions Report” if public pressure ever piles up!
Because of this predictable inefficacy of the end result of your call for public hearings, it is perhaps more useful to ask and explore the following meta question which was also briefly alluded to at the beginning of this letter: is it a ‘crime’ if the matter is deemed to be an ‘official’ (even if covert) American Foreign Policy Initiative to nuclearize Pakistan and Israel? Or is the only crime here that it may have employed mercenaries, moles, patsies, and client-states in its operational execution without first getting the right Congressional laws on the books (which they very well could have at the risk of tipping off their hands to the world prematurely)? Thus note that Turkey has recently been approved (or is about to be approved) for nuclear cooperation – thus Turkey’s role in this covert-ops may (retroactively) no longer be defined as a crime in the strictly legal sense. So what exactly is the definition of a crime? What exactly have you discovered that you think is a crime? The fact that money changed hands? Or the fact that Pakistan was given nuclear technology? All these appear to be merely matters of semantics in defining what is a crime and what isn’t, and the underlying real substantial issues are indeed not being addressed by focussing on the leaves of the tree and not its DNA.
Witness that the decimation of Vietnam and millions of its peoples is yet to be classified as a monumental crime against humanity, and its harbingers went to their graves without ever being hung by their balls. And what was one of them threatened with at best? Impeachment because of lying about illegally breaking into a building! Also witness that the ‘Truman Doctrine’ which criminally held hostage the entire world at the brink of Armageddon for almost the entire second half of the twentieth century, and which culminated in the decimation of Afghanistan and its millions of peoples in order to finally take down the USSR in a proxy war on another’s lands with another’s blood, is often hailed as a major success of America’s foreign policy. Its harbingers are still vigorously pursuing their ‘American Dreams’ in various think-tanks and academe in your neck of the woods while planning more decimations under its successor doctrine, the ‘Bush Doctrine‘.
You tread a rather vacuous line if you use the existing model and definition of ‘justice’ and ‘legality’ to uncover this crime as well. However, if you were to move over to a more rational and equitable set of universally applied norms for fairness and legality – let’s say for example, acknowledging the overwhelming superiority of the Judeo-Christian heritage, the Ten Commandments and the Biblical Golden Rule are both suitably ‘secularized’ and applied to American Foreign Policy calculus and the Congress is prevailed upon to make laws in accordance with these – you may more efficaciously be able to hang the real monumental criminals at the altar of real justice. I suspect if such fundamental matters enter the public consciousness and are openly debated, it may yet change the complexion of this nation.
Otherwise what really changes? Unless you are bold enough to assert that “imperial mobilization” is itself a monumental crime; that it is counter to the democratic aspirations of the peoples of the United States of America because “democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization” and thus its covert pursuit is treasonous by definition under any pretext, even when couched as ‘American Foreign Policy Initiative’ or ‘preemptive self-defense’; that the very exercise of ‘hegemony’ is the prime-mover that leads to covert-ops in the first place, and to the wanton usurpation of the ‘lesser’ humanity; and that both its advocates and harbingers alike are the worst monumental criminals of humanity to be sent off to Guantanamo Bay for eternity; unless you boldly assert all these commonsensical truths, at best, after you are done successfully prosecuting your investigations at the FBI and getting your public Congressional hearings on them, what do you get? One set of dispensable ‘hectoring hegemons’ is simply replaced by another, but in continuation of the same overarching policies of ’empire’. The ‘party’ still continues! Witness that the underlying themes of dealing in “straight power concepts” articulated by George Kennan in 1948 still hold sway in 2008, and are directly responsible for the unspeakable horrors committed from Vietnam to Iraq, and perhaps now in Iran and Pakistan!
One final note: You might find the following rebuttal essay on ‘Nuclear Security’ thought provoking in the context of your public disclosures and concern for nuclear security (http://humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2007/12/response-toziamian-nuclear-security.html). The essay argues that a fair calculus of nuclear security should not just be limited to protection of the ’empire’ from the terrorist acts of the so called ‘pirates’ and ‘rogue’ states acquiring ‘loose nukes’ and/or developing their own crude arsenal, but also include protection from the predatory impulses of the ’emperor’ to threaten preemptive nuclear first-strikes on non-nuclear nations to get them to heel. And further include protection from the emperor’s vengeful retaliatory nuclear strikes in the event of any wanton nuclear terrorist act that is unilaterally blamed upon the lowly non-nuclear state merely because that darn stateless terrorist master actor, “Bin Laden”, is cited within its borders and releases a confessional video!
A sound nuclear security calculus [and global systems of checks and balances] must be able to [at least] deter both these [nuclear primacy] scenarios (A, B), and must become the focus of concerned whistleblowers as the likely near term threat facing a vast majority of innocent peoples. Would you agree that this poses a far greater threat to the world’s security and peace prospects then the 7 or 8 year old FBI [recorded] conversations in Turkish? And would you further agree that more you insist on visiting old information, more current information and present risks will be swept under the rug? Thus it isn’t surprising to me that Rupert Murdoc’s newspaper in England leaked your story out at this time when America is getting ready to attack Iran – for to my cynical mind, it’s a wonderfully distracting and vacuous mystery chase that can occupy the otherwise sharp minds focussed on matters of more pressing urgency!
I hope this was useful. It may be entirely off the mark as well, as it is just an outsider’s view trying to make sense of it all. However, as you may well have learnt listening to the FBI tapes, the concept of independent ‘nation-states’ is now quite passé, and we are entering a New World Order in which “The United States has overstepped its borders in all spheres — economic, political and humanitarian and has imposed itself on other states.” This “unipolar” world “means in practice one thing: one center of power, one center of force, one center of decision-making, a world of one master, one sovereign,” which makes the world “extremely dangerous.” (Putin, February 10, 2007). A recognition of this blatant fact must [surely] enter into the forensic interpretation of any data that pertains to covert-ops on the ‘Grand Chessboard’. Nothing is at face value.
With best wishes for continued success in your on-going quest for real truth and justice as ‘just a citizen‘ that can make a lasting and substantial impact on the calculus of your nation’s foreign policy initiatives for the benefit and welfare of the entire world’s peoples.
This letter will be posted at http://Humanbeingsfirst.org.
Footnotes: The letter is fully referenced with embedded links in the original source which are not reproduced here.
There is a followup analysis to this letter after undertaking a thorough study of Sibel Edmonds’ public disclosures, interviews, and videos, March 27, 2008, aptly titled: “Beware of Red Herrings on Nuclear Security spun by Hectoring Hegemons and their patsies!” http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2008/03/beware-redherrings-nuclear-security.html
* Since this writing, further research by this scribe has revealed that it is very likely that the so called rogue network of American intelligence operatives was working hand-in-glove with the Pakistani metallurgist Dr. A. Q. Khan to in fact sabotage, compromise, and/or delay Pakistan’s nuclear weapons program by planting false and/or unworkable products, technologies, purchases, and leads. The evidence based on the actual role of Dr. A. Q. Khan in Pakistan’s nuclear weapons development which was indeed minuscule, suggests that Dr. A. Q. Khan may have been a Trojan Horse diabolically planted in Pakistan by Western intelligence to subvert the genuine efforts of Pakistani scientists like Dr. Munir Ahmad Khan at the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission. Private conversations with several Pakistani scientists and researchers reveal an entirely different perspective from the one publicly promulgated in the West as well as in Pakistan. Unable to sabotage the nuclear weapons development directly, the ‘loose nukes’ has been fashioned for plans B and C – saving Pakistan and the world from their falling into the hands of Ali Baba.
Profound Clairvoyance or Blatant Obviousness?
February 19, 2008*
*Addendums February 23, 2008 ; March 29, 2008 ; September 10, 2008
On February 19, 2008, Pakistan’s largest English language daily Dawn and the world pressidentically reported in a story boldly headlined “Indian official warns over Pakistan nukes”, that: “The nature of the dangers which nuclear weapons pose has dramatically intensified with the growing risk that such weapons may be acquired by terrorists… The mounting concern over the likelihood that in a situation of chaos, Pakistan’s nuclear assets may fall into the hands of jihadi elements … underscores how real this danger has become … India has to be deeply concerned about the danger it faces”.
As usual, neither Pakistan’s Foreign office, nor Pakistan’s newsmedia appear to be adequately equipped to effectively deal with this propaganda mantra of ‘loose nukes’. The rising crescendo of this mantra which will be dutifully harvested to eventually see NATO and UN troops taking over our ‘nuke’ safety to come ‘save’ us and the world, was fully dismantled in this rebuttal-report by Project Humanbeingsfirst: “Response to Zia Mian’s ‘How Not to Handle Nuclear Security’”, available at http://humanbeingsfirst.org.
This report on ‘nuclear security’ was forwarded to the Foreign Office through a retired military contact person, but that august Office does not seem to have benefited from it. Even almost two months later, right in the middle of Pakistan’s most important election, indeed on election day itself, the matter surfaces again. The prime reason for this was also preemptively deconstructed in this stark warning to the nation by Project Humanbeingsfirst: “Wakeup to the grotesque reality of the ‘Grand Chessboard’”.
All this analytical deconstruction of reality is of course under the premise that lonely ‘Alice’ is wide awake while the mainstream has been complicity sold the ‘Mad Hatter’s’ reality at the ‘unbirthday party’ enthusiastically singing the ‘imperial’ war song without noticing its absurdity.
To understand just how absurd, the fact that the trumpeting elephants in the bedroom are also loudly singing the ‘imperial song’ and yet remain unnoticed – as examined in the following two dismantling-reports of Benazir Bhutto’s assassination by Project Humanbeingsfirst: “Perpetuating the fiction of Who Killed Benazir Bhutto” and “Who Killed Benazir Bhutto? In her own words!” – with all mainstream news sources choosing to ignore the subject matter entirely, is telling in and of itself of either co-option or complicity.
The perpetuation of this absurdity can further be witnessed in the opinion piece in the same edition of Dawn (‘US poll fears‘) by the Rand Corporation’s ‘antiterrorism expert’, Farhana Ali, that entirely omitted any aspect of this hidden-only-in-plain-sight reality. While voices of ’empire’ deftly spinning “imperial mobilization” as its ‘war on terror’ continually get prominence in the victims’ own newspapers and are loudly echoed by its own politicians and ruling elite who now claim to be more ‘white’ than the ‘white man’ willingly carrying more of its ‘burden’, contrarian voices of reasoned-sanity able to penetrate through the mass-deception and ‘technique of infamy’ are conveniently shut out.
Thus, it is not surprising that Zardari itches to join his late iconoclastic wife in cleaning out “the very petri dish of international terrorism” [ http://www.cfr.org/publication/14041 ] : ‘The Pakistan People’s Party (PPP), if it comes into power, must persuade the people that the fight against militants is “our war”, not just America’s war, party Co-chairman Asif Ali Zardari said on Saturday.’ (Daily Times, February 17, 2008, ‘Taliban fight is our war: Zardari’)
Well, the proof of the pudding (prognostications) is in its eating (coming true). The following was ‘clairvoyantly’ predicted by Project Humanbeingsfirst in its bold wakeup call to the Pakistani nation two months ago. While almost all pundits of Pakistani politics everywhere, including Pakistan’s own newsmedia and its intelligentsia, were crying hoarse of ‘rigging’ at the polls until today – the day after elections – Project Humanbeingsfirst seems to have been the only analytically deconstructing voice to have suggested to the contrary as far back as December 21, 2007 in its wakeup call:
“ … This mantra of elections is replete with red herrings craftily synthesized to maintain Pakistan as a servile client-state in order to carry on with the same bold ‘imperial designs’ on the ‘Grand Chessboard’. It is merely the rebottling of the same old wine in a different bottle. It will surely be legitimately conducted, with no apparent riggings, and duly approved by all the impartial international observers to give the artful elections an official international legitimacy.
It is quite immaterial who wins in these elections. The laws and the judiciary of the nation have already been reconstituted under the umbrella of ’emergency’ to enable the nation to carry on unfettered in its primary objective of fighting the ‘War on Terror’ as an obedient patsy client-state – and hence to carry on in its own devilishly crafted suicide! …”
And we see exactly the same come true today, February 19, 2008. Witness Dawn’s reports: US hopes polls lead to ‘civilian democracy’, and ‘Heavyweights knocked out’; The Nation’s reports: Pakistani people have spoken- US, and Foreign observers satisfied over free and fair elections; The Daily Times report: Foreign observers satisfied. Hopefully, nothing further that the rational and awakened mind prognosticates, will ever come true.
Thus perhaps it is better to continue wishing upon the well and not examine Kosovo’s independence yesterday at the hands of NATO that was immediately accepted, never mind aided and abetted, by the United States and the EU after NATO and UN forces had been invited in on a ‘peace mission‘ with a UN resolution in 1999. There is certainly no reason to fear Baluchistan – sharing similar grievances and step-sisterly treatment – meeting a similar ‘independence’ along similar pretexts that will initially invite NATO in to come ‘save us’ from the ‘Taliban’ and the ‘loose nukes’ about to fall into their inglorious hands!
The next step – repartition, as examined in the wakeup call. At that time, the repartitioning of Pakistan will make as much sense, and will garner as much world sympathy and support, as Serbia’s partition today.
This is the great slight-of-hand devilish power of the New World Order – make things so bad for the peoples through state-sponsored terrorism and the ‘war on terror’ which legitimizes any inhumanity and any level of destruction including nuclear attacks on non-nuclear nations, that the terrorized peoples will rush to the State (or the world’s Policeman) seeking mainly only their security, willingly giving up anything and everything in return including their inalienable Rights as Human Beings First! Far fetched? That is how the Americans and their brethren in the EU and the UK have lost their “essential liberties”. For the Global South, while the modus operandi remain the same, the baby-steps are mere ‘pawn’ moves on the ‘Grand Chessboard’. Study the geostrategic game of the ‘hectoring hegemons’ with the imperialist’s mind and its doctrines, and the baby-steps become obvious. Keep solely focussing on each baby-step as it unfolds by sheer ‘happenstance’, and the accurate predictions of the next baby-steps appear clairvoyant!
The newly elected team (and their next legatees) will surely ensure that Pakistan’s pathetic ‘descent into oblivion’ transpires, as by their own admission, they accept that the fabricated ‘fight against militants is “our war”, not just America’s war’.
None other than America’s favorite son’s prophetic words appear to be of most relevance in describing this phenomenon of the ‘Negro’ that has been transpiring in this nation since its ‘wretched’ inception:
“The white establishment is skilled in flattering and cultivating emerging leaders. It presses its own image on them and finally, from imitation of manners, dress, and style of living, a deeper strain of corruption develops. This kind of Negro leader acquires the white man’s contempt for the ordinary Negro. He is often more at home with the middle-class white than he is among his own people. His language changes, his location changes, his income changes, and ultimately he changes from the representative of the Negro to the white man into the white man’s representative to the Negro. The tragedy is that too often he does not recognize what has happened to him.” (Martin Luther King).
The seeds for this ‘Negro’ phenomenon were deftly cultivated in our fertile obsequious soil by Lord Macaulay when he imaginatively synthesized the ‘Indian babu’ or ‘brown sahib’ who would “form a class who may be interpreters between us and the millions whom we govern; a class of persons, Indian in blood and colour, but English in taste, in opinions, in morals, and in intellect.”
This phenomenon, of dominant civilizations constructing ‘native informants’ in order to colonize its victims with their own kind, like “hegemony”, is hardly new however. It is in fact, “as old as mankind”.
And its blanket recognition in every generation in every age seems to have become a first necessity of self-defense for its victims – at least among those who still have any dignity and self-respect left. This is all the more essential today in the age of neo-colonialism where the ‘baboons’ du jour seek “full spectrum dominance” using the best techniques and methods of Machiavelli, game theory, and devilish machinations, including multi-faceted ‘technique of infamy’ of inventing multiple lies and covert-ops to keep the peoples occupied debating which of them might be true while fait-accompli proceeds in the backdrop of vacuous debates and red herrings. In an age where “Deception is the mind of the State”, effective self-defense by a people can only begin by anticipating and unraveling that deception. That’s just how it is!
Addendum February 23, 2008
As if to deliberately lend further substance to the deconstructed reality outlined here, the following two news reports appeared in today’s Dawn: “Musharraf has a role in new set-up: US” and “Pressure on Asif, Nawaz to work with president”. The titles are revealing in and of themselves and need no further elaboration per se except to carefully note that it is a public relations campaign to justify to the Pakistani public what is already the foregone, very calculatingly played out machinations to affect the movement of a patsy ‘pawn’ on the ‘Grand Chessboard’. And the following oped in the Nation yesterday (February 22, 2008), “After the election”, is among the first to appear from the editorial writers of a major English language daily in Pakistan that finally seems to have found the courage to start ‘clairvoyantly’ seeing the structural reality of these elections that shouts ‘status quo’: “… The President is actually ideally placed for a repetition of 1988, only earlier. He should dissolve the National Assembly as soon as he feels that the electorate is now likely to give him the Parliament he wants, which is one with the power of validating his actions under the PCO and Emergency, and which will let him pick as PM a rank outsider, who will disappear as graciously as Shaukat Aziz. The President has the dissolution power, so he will find enough opportunity. The first reason he will have is that of the War on Terror. Joining the self-serving American and European choruses of “not enough” will be the President of Pakistan, who will use this as a ground of dissolution.” Thank you Nation for showing some journalistic integrity by way of attempting to see past the manifest ‘katputli tamashas’ on the ‘Grand Chessboard’. When will others follow suit in seeing the elephants collectively trumpeting in the newlywed’s bed?
Addendum2 March 29, 2008
More clairvoyance? The following headlines in today’s and yesterday’s Dawn scream out the grotesque reality on the ‘Grand Chessboard’ that is to culminate in a premeditated nuclear war on Iran with Pakistan being dragged into it just as compellingly as both Afghanistan and Iraq. The writing’s on the wall, with the new incoming administration in Pakistan once again, like the previous administrations over the past 9 years, either willingly as idiotic patsies, or complicitly as sharing in the aims of the ‘hectoring hegemons’, are diligently working on their portion of the plan to “birth-pang” the entire “Global Zone of Percolating Violence”. In either case, their monumentally criminal deconstruction of Pakistan is proceeding with haste as predicted:
Unless there are any ‘ma ka lals’ remaining in Pakistan, this ‘wretched’ country – my only nationality and geophysical identity – in a very short time will descend into a situation of exacerbated Muslim on Muslim violence as is even unfolding once again in Iraq today under orchestration, for which the President of United States expressed his satisfaction in these words: . Similar words have been written for Pakistan. May the treasonous, wherever they may reside, never find peace; every time they look in the mirror, may they only see images like these happening to their own kin. What else can a powerless plebeian efficaciously do – but to show the hegemons how life might be for them under the Biblical Golden Rule ‘do unto others as you have others do unto you’?
Addendum3 September 10, 2008
Observing the events of the day being rehearsed with all the pomp and majestic show – complete with horse-drawn buggy and kisses on the cheeks and all – before the applauding world with Mr. Zardari taking the highest oath of office in Pakistan, reminded me of the opening wedding scene from Mario Puzo’s movie the Godfather, attended by the motley of morality-challenged, all dressed in their finest Sunday outfits. The only thing that appeared to be missing during the festivities in the non-movie version was the camera zooming into private meetings in beautifully shuttered oak and mahogany paneled darkened rooms behind closed doors on how the “territory” was to be divided up, who would get what loot, and who would be assigned to make which offer that couldn’t be refused! Even the fictional Michael Coreleone could not go so “legit” as the real life enactment! Once made “legit” and cleansed into a “virgin”, is it slanderous to recall the past? None of the afore-stated staid recollections from newspaper reports even begin to scratch the real surface of the actual experiences of many Pakistanis under Asif Ali Zardari during the two short hereditary reigns of his beloved wife. His popular nom de guerre of “Mr. ten percent” among the general public hardly did him justice. And neither could Al Capone ever be charged for anything other than tax evasion! Even that opportunity no longer exists – so long as the godfather dutifully continues America’s “war on terror”! See: Happy-Happy Zardari: A monologue on Hope and Voluntary Servitude.
Perpetuating the fiction of Who Killed Benazir Bhutto
February 09, 2008
In a report in Pakistan’s largest English language daily, Dawn, on February 07, 2008, the following precious gem was noted: ‘Defence officials told Congress on Wednesday that Al Qaeda is operating from havens in “under-governed regions” of Pakistan, which they said pose direct threats to Europe, the United States and the Pakistan government itself.’
The report presciently continued, almost as if in sympathetic baby-step realization of the outlandish ‘self-defense’ scenario already laid out in this scribe’s wakeup call “Wakeup to the grotesque reality of the ‘Grand Chessboard’” (http://Humanbeingsfirst.org): ‘Adm. Michael Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, predicted in written testimony that the next attack on the United States probably would be launched by terrorists in that region.’
Since the penning of this wakeup call to the Pakistani peoples, Benazir Bhutto (http://humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2008/02/who-killed-benazir-bhutto-herownwords.html) was assassinated only a week later to further the ‘strategy of tension‘ in Pakistan, while simultaneously lending more substance to the boogieman of ‘al-qaeeda’ which was immediately blamed by the Pakistan Government and its English language press the very next day (Dawn, Daily Times, Najam Sethi, December 29, 2007).
The Scotland Yard, which was asked to investigate the assassination, before they had even fully embarked on their forensic journey had already expressed their belief “Scotland Yard believes Al-Qaeda assassinated Benazir Bhutto” (Times Online, January 13, 2008).
And on February 08, 2008, the NY Times reported that the Scotland Yard has conclusively offered the JFK vintage ‘lone gunman’ theory, pinning the blame on the ubiquitous cavemen of ‘al-qaeeda’ sitting with their laptops and Klashnikovs in the Hindu Kush monitoring, controlling, and threatening the world’s foremost armed to the teeth superpower and its allies.
In support of the Scotland Yard’s conclusions, Pakistan immediately arrested “Two very important terrorists” as noted by the Dawn. The Daily Times too echoed: ‘ “It is a major breakthrough. These two men were involved in the assassination and they are from a militant group which is relatively new,” the official said. “Their tentacles are from the tribal region and Baitullah Mehsud” ‘.
The United States immediately, and enthusiastically, endorsed the findings: “In terms of the investigation itself by Scotland Yard, we view this as a credible investigation by independent outside experts … we don’t have any reason why we would question the validity of their assessment”, as reported by the Nation.
The International Herald Tribune however, perhaps more interested in journalism than in supporting “imperial mobilization”, candidly observed: “The [Scotland Yard] findings support the Pakistani government’s explanation of Bhutto’s assassination in December, an account that had been greeted with disbelief by Bhutto’s supporters, other Pakistanis and medical experts.”
The following was added by IHT for additional forensic clarity into the matter (echoing the sentiments of the NY Times): “It is unclear how the Scotland Yard investigators reached such conclusive findings absent autopsy results or other potentially important evidence that was washed away by cleanup crews in the immediate aftermath of the blast,”.
Interestingly, most mainstream English newspapers the world over carried similar observations spanning the gamut of endorsement to mild skepticism. But none that I scanned, ventured as far as to forensically equate the assassination of Benazir Bhutto with ‘Synthetic Terror‘ in order to fabricate pretexts for further “imperial mobilization” on the ‘Grand Chessboard‘! The grotesquely trumpeting elephant dancing on the newlywed’s bed once again famously ignored.
Manufacturing ‘consent’ is in full swing worldwide, but mainly targeted at the sole superpower’s “populist democracy” which is strongly “inimical to imperial mobilization … except in the circumstance of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat … [and sustained] challenge to the public’s sense of domestic well-being”, as Zbigniew Brzezinski shrewdly puts it.
So, the ruling elite of the world, once again, appear to be realigned in perpetuating the scare of the imminent destruction of Western civilization at the hands of the ‘Islamofascists’ – calculatingly constructed by Bernard Lewis in CFR’s influential ‘Foreign Affairs’ in 1990 on the eve of the emergence of the victorious sole superpower on the ‘Grand Chessboard’, as the “irrational … roots of Muslim rage … [which] is no less than a clash of civilizations” – just as it was in 2003 with the mantra of ‘WMD’s’ in the hands of ‘rogue actors’.
Between some ‘red’ and ‘orange’ alert, Daniel Pipes ratcheted that up to “Not a Clash of Civilizations, It’s a Clash between the Civilized World and Barbarians” to make up for the increasing lackadaisical attitude among the skeptical populist democracies as “so many people in the West still don’t believe that they are at war [with] .. radical Islam”!
Only this time, the boogieman’s nom de guerre is “Baitullah Mehsud”, and it resides in a cave in the Hindu Kush with OBL instead of in a desert palace in Mesopotamia. And it is likely to steal a “loose nuke” or two from Pakistan which the Iranians will dutifully use to destroy the sanity of the West with, leading to their (Iran’s) instant decimation in “’defensive’ US military action” and the much longed for ‘de-nuking’ of Pakistan by NATO and UN forces already staged at its borders.
The next stop, all too obviously, is the increasing crescendo of imminent threats to Western civilization, followed by a real ‘terrorist’ act as narrated by Zbigniew Brzezinski a year ago before the US. Senate Foreign Relations Committee (February 01, 2007, quoted in the wakeup call), and as ominously prognosticated by Adm. Mullen before the US. Congress a year later (February 06, 2008, noted above). And rather unsurprisingly, the world’s foremost investigative bodies will entirely reach the conclusion-space already outlined in the wakeup call no differently from the Scotland Yard today.
A new ‘coalition of the willing’ – destination Tehran and Islamabad next!
And almost as if on cue to the above prognostications penned on February 09, 2008, Fox News reported on Wednesday, February 13, 2008, in its story headlined “Bush Pushes for House Action on Eavesdropping Rules After Senate Passage” the following statement by President George W. Bush: “terrorists are planning new attacks on our country … that will make Sept. 11 pale by comparison.”
Yes indeed it will, because this time, the new “new pearl harbor” is expected to be a nuclear terrorist act. One for which, the United States Government has been diligently preparing for with simulated drills and workshops like the “Day After”. [ http://iis-db.stanford.edu/pubs/21872/DayAfterWorkshopReport.pdf ]
These drills can – like all other surprise 9/11 and 7/7 days of infamy that had exactly similar drills which miraculously became live – once again become live ‘terrorist’ events and lead to massive “imperial mobilization” against all remaining nations in the ‘arc of crisis’ already identified on the ‘Grand Chessboard’.
It ain’t rocket science, unless one is shilling for empire. Between ‘manufacturing consent’ to harness popular public opinion and ‘manufacturing dissent’ to distract the protests with red herrings, all agencies, global newsmedia, and various and sundry vassals of ’empire’ are assiduously crafting the “high degree of doctrinal motivation, intellectual commitment” necessary for “imperial mobilization” of Western “populist democracies” which are no longer “infected by imperialist emotions …a quest for national glory, ‘the white man’s burden’, ‘la mission civilisatrice’, …”. (Brzezinski)
It is perhaps also why, no English language daily in Pakistan, or the New York Times, has bothered to publish this humble scribe’s ‘brilliant’ forewarnings – it seems that they don’t like real forensic clairvoyance, or uncomfortable deconstruction of reality when ‘Alice’ is wide awake! Only hard ex post facto ‘forensic’ data, as gleaned by the Scotland Yard, and as endorsed by the official organs and vassals of the sole superpower, before they determine “all the news that’s fit to print” to the incessant beat of the ‘Mad Hatter’s’ imperial war song!
What’s it gonna take for the Pakistan’s ruling establishment, and its press (never mind the world or its press) to wakeup to the grotesque reality of simple arithmetic of ‘2 + 2 = 4’ on the ‘Grand Chessboard’ and to stop rehearsing the asinine mantra of ‘war on terror‘ against the fabricated ‘al qaeeda’? An ex post facto narrative in ten-twenty years? A multi-million dollar book deal after the nation’s ‘descent into oblivion‘ is complete? Or the ‘morning after’? Post fait accompli of yet another ‘new pearl harbor’, there is no ‘red pill’ – only victims! And further exaggerated wet dreams of “full spectrum dominance” of ‘baboons’ in suits and ties passing off as hominids!
Stand-up today as the genuine hominid and unmask the impostors, or live in the ruins of humanity tomorrow as pet-zombies of the ‘baboons’ – for only the early-dead would have mercifully remained human!
The world, the majority hominids inhabiting it, and its co-opted rulers in developing nations would do well to heed the clairvoyance of Bernard Lewis in ‘Crisis of Islam’: “If the fundamentalists are correct in their calculations and succeed in their war, then a dark future awaits the world, especially the part of it that embraces Islam” and take defensive-note of the ominously prescient “Global Zone of Percolating Violence” identified by Zbigniew Brzezinski in the ‘Grand Chessboard’.
For, it isn’t’ only the children of the ‘lesser god’ in the South who are in danger of losing their tabula rasa, but the privileged Northern civilizations are likely to descend into police-states and martial law with another 911 transpiring in any Western nation. All the laws are already on the books to create ‘legal dictatorships’ in the West to protect the nice Judeo-Christian peoples from the evil ‘Islamofascists’!
What a model of civilizational-progress in the modernity du jour whereby the entire specie is in a steep transformative ‘descent into oblivion’ due to a handful of parasites ‘who wage wars by way of deception’ cleverly making patsies even of their own victims. That is the pathetic tragedy of Benazir Bhutto (see “Who Killed Benazir Bhutto? In her own words!”).
The vast majority, 99.9%, have been silenced into apathetically “looking from the side”, while their respective co-opted local ruling elite control all sources of power to become the major cheerleaders and circus clowns of the ‘hectoring hegemons’ – uncannily forgetting that six feet under, the hungry maggots can’t tell the difference!
Footnote: The essay is fully referenced with embedded links in the original source which are not reproduced here.
Letters to Editors On their perpetuating the fiction of Who Killed Benazir Bhutto!
February 08-19, 2009
Letter to Editor, Dawn – “Indian official warns over Pakistan nukes”, February 19, 2008
On February 19, 2008, Dawn reported that: “The nature of the dangers which nuclear weapons pose has dramatically intensified with the growing risk that such weapons may be acquired by terrorists… The mounting concern over the likelihood that in a situation of chaos, Pakistan’s nuclear assets may fall into the hands of jihadi elements … underscores how real this danger has become … India has to be deeply concerned about the danger it faces”.
As usual, neither Pakistan’s Foreign office, nor Pakistan’s newsmedia appear to be adequately equipped to effectively deal with this propaganda mantra of ‘loose nukes’. The rising crescendo of this mantra which will be dutifully harvested to eventually see NATO and UN troops taking over our ‘nuke’ safety to come ‘save’ us and the world, was fully dismantled in this rebuttal-report by Project Humanbeingsfirst: “Response to Zia Mian’s ‘How Not to Handle Nuclear Security’”.
This report was forwarded to the Foreign Office through a retired military contact person, but that august Office does not seem to have benefited from it. Even almost two months later, right in the middle of Pakistan’s most important election, indeed on election day itself, the matter surfaces again. The prime reason for this was also preemptively deconstructed in this stark warning to the nation by Project Humanbeingsfirst: “Wakeup to the grotesque reality of the ‘Grand Chessboard’”.
All this analytical deconstruction of reality is of course under the premise that lonely ‘Alice’ is wide awake while the mainstream has been complicity sold the ‘Mad Hatter’s’ reality at the ‘unbirthday party’ enthusiastically singing the ‘imperial’ war song without noticing its absurdity.
To understand just how absurd, the fact that the trumpeting elephants in the bedroom are also singing the ‘imperial song’ and remain unnoticed – as examined in these two analysis reports of Benazir Bhutto’s assassination by Project Humanbeingsfirst: “Perpetuating the fiction of Who Killed Benazir Bhutto”, and “Who Killed Benazir Bhutto? In her own words!”, with all mainstream news sources choosing to ignore the subject matter entirely – is telling in and of itself.
This absurdity can further be witnessed in the opinion piece in the same edition of Dawn (US poll fears) by the Rand Corporation ‘antiterrorism expert’, Farhana Ali. While voices of ’empire’ deftly spinning “imperial mobilization” as its ‘war on terror’ continually get prominence in the victims’ own newspapers and are loudly echoed by its own politicians and ruling elite who claim to be more ‘white’ than the ‘white man’ willingly carrying more of its ‘burden’, contrarian voices of sanity able to penetrate through the mass deception are conveniently shut out.
Well, the proof of the pudding is in its eating. The following was clairvoyantly predicted by Project Humanbeingsfirst in its bold wakeup call to the Pakistani nation two months ago. While almost all pundits of Pakistani politics everywhere were crying hoarse of ‘rigging’ at the polls until today – the day after elections – Project Humanbeingsfirst seems to have been the only voice to have suggested to the contrary as far back as December 21, 2007 in its wakeup call:
“ … This mantra of elections is replete with red herrings craftily synthesized to maintain Pakistan as a servile client-state in order to carry on with the same bold ‘imperial designs’ on the ‘Grand Chessboard’. It is merely the rebottling of the same old wine in a different bottle. It will surely be legitimately conducted, with no apparent riggings, and duly approved by all the impartial international observers to give the artful elections an official international legitimacy.
It is quite immaterial who wins in these elections. The laws and the judiciary of the nation have already been reconstituted under the umbrella of ’emergency’ to enable the nation to carry on unfettered in its primary objective of fighting the ‘War on Terror’ as an obedient patsy client-state – and hence to carry on in its own devilishly crafted suicide! …”
And we see exactly the same come true today (in Dawn’s report: US hopes polls lead to ‘civilian democracy’, and ‘Heavyweights knocked out’). Hopefully nothing else that the rational and awakened mind prognosticates, will ever come true.
Letter to Editor, Dawn, February 14, 2008 – “How low can your government sink?”
In his weekly column of February 10, 2008, ‘From crisis to crisis‘, the venerable Ardeshir Cowasjee, after making some banal but obviously true observations about the absence of “law and order” and how little our ruling elite has likely ever understood “democracy” such that they have not even risen to its level of “mediocrity” as the “worst form of government except for all others”, concluded with this question and assertion: “President General Musharraf, how low can your government sink? The dead will one day be heard.”
While I defer to the senior columnist’s expert knowledge of the dead as I can’t claim to know much about what if anything awaits them apart from mythologies that I have been taught, as an ordinary plebeian, I can however, humbly, but verifiably offer that we haven’t seen the “low” yet. It is rather surprising that even as a veteran octogenarian who has seen all the machinations of superpowers, Cowasjee is unable to insightfully describe the ‘hectoring hegemons’ playing the ‘great game’ once again on the ‘Grand Chessboard’. He is evidently unfamiliar with the computer science concept of ‘Most Significant Bits’ (MSB) in a vector of bits each of which contributes according to its station and position in a computer word. An MSB can trivially override the value of lower order bits just as easily as a ‘one’ in the thousandth place overshadows a ‘one’ in the tenth or unitary place in our familiar decimal arithmetic. For local national politics to be independently culpable for their failings, the machinations of higher geopolitics has to be diked (i.e., neutralized by building dikes). Identifying the true significance of various ‘bits’ is just as important for computer science as it is for social and political science. The West excels in both; we merely only mimic them without much comprehension either of state-craft, computer science, or any science for that matter (with few notable exceptions).
Well, the machinations to first create a crippled Pakistan in an entirely avoidable blood-bath as an easily manipulatable ‘client-state’ to check the advance of Communism – Jinnah’s and the Muslims’ genuine struggle for a separate nation notwithstanding – and then to maintain this status quo in deliberate equilibrium in which none of the original aspirations for a separate nation could be realized, to the present day of deliberate destabilization to squirrel away its “loose nukes” and to repartition the outmoded ‘client-state’ to better suit the new posturing in the new ‘great game’ on the ‘Grand Chessboard’, are known to any half-serious student of superpower geopolitics. Why such an understanding should remain notably absent in Ardeshir Cowasjee’s columns as the ‘MSB’ of Pakistan’s trauma and travails can perhaps only be addressed by him in further elaboration of his own question “how low can your government sink?”
In this plebeian’s view, this ‘wretched’ nation is in its steep “descent into oblivion”. The assassination of Benazir Bhutto (as deconstructed in “Who Killed Benazir Bhutto? In her own words!”), and the clever red herring of the patsy ‘al qaeeda’ taking the fall not only for the assassination (as analyzed in “Perpetuating the fiction of Who Killed Benazir Bhutto”) but also a stolen “loose nuke” or two (as deconstructed in “Response to Zia Mian’s ‘How Not to Handle Nuclear Security’”), are all baby-steps in the nation’s further destabilization that begs the mature analysis of veteran and seasoned thinkers like Cowasjee and privileged others who grace the columns of this august newspaper and get to have their say.
I look forward to either a convincing rebuttal of these deconstructions of manifest ‘katputli tamashas’, or Ardeshir Cowasjee and Dawn (in its editorials) courageously coming right out and saying what most plebeian Pakistanis today believe to be the truth of the matter – for that is indeed the only meaning of Democracy – what people believe, and what they want. This is really why it is the worst form of government, one that can at best, rise to plebeian norms, the norms that killed Socrates. For all other norms are thought to be far worse – or that is what the West, and Cowasjee, would like us to believe.
Even accepting what the ‘White Man’ has taught us in its ‘la mission civilisatrice’ – which we have gobbled up like no other ‘brown sahibs’ in history – the peoples neither have a voice, nor any genuine representation, never mind a ‘social contract’ according to which they agree to be governed according to the laws they approve and ratify. All of this is hogged by the ruling elite and their vassals who collaborate to construct ‘Mafioso’ contracts to govern the ‘serfs’ by, whose only eye is for the national “kitty” and unbridled power, and who deftly either ‘manufacture consent’ by bleating ‘imperial’ songs du jour in dutiful service as obliging ‘client-state’, or ‘manufacture dissent’ by purporting to be exposing the ‘imperial’ crimes. But in reality, in both cases, only cleverly deflect from the ‘MSB’ of the matter and thus inadvertently, or deliberately, misdiagnose the disease. Let either charge not be the fate of any honest exponent of truth.
Project Humanbeingsfirst.org, Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Letter to Editor, The News, February 14, 2008 – More patsies on the ‘Grand Chessboard’
In its editorial of February 14, 2008, titled “Benazir’s book”, the News opined: “While Benazir, in her book, touches on many critical concerns, including those of terror and relations between Islam and the west, the task of solving these problems is no easy one.” I would humbly venture to offer that such a relation is rather straightforward to fathom, and indeed solve, for those un co-opted few who understand the need for boogieman to promulgate ’empire’. Has this august newspaper become so memory challenged like the unfortunate victim herself that it cannot bring perspective to bear on the deception game being played on the ‘Grand Chessboard’?
Not only was Benazir Bhutto made a patsy by the ‘hectoring hegemons’ as rationally deconstructed in “Who Killed Benazir Bhutto? In her own words!”, but the entire nation, not to mention the world, is again being made a patsy by deliberately “Perpetuating the fiction of Who Killed Benazir Bhutto”.
If the newsmedia cannot lend perspective to imperial monumental crimes against humanity and becomes so relegated to being obedient stenographers that they entirely mimic their masters (ruling elite) whom they appear to exclusively serve as if they were the TASS of yesterday, perhaps it’s time to shut down the profession of journalism. If one cannot distinguish between the crimes of the ‘pirates’ and the ’emperors’, cannot identify the cultivated puppets from the puppetmasters, are unable to apportion to each the guilt and culpability commensurate with their station, no reportage is perhaps better than being complicit in perpetuating mass deception for “imperial mobilization”. For then, at least, peoples’ own commonsense comes into play for the inalienable right to self-defense! It is the sowing of confusion and obfuscation that enable any ruling-elite to carry-on as vassals and client-states of ’empire’.
And while I can quite agree with the editorial when it notes: “Most immediately, any government would have to find means to improve the precarious security situation in the country, and nothing that the PPP’s leadership has said so far gives any indication that it has a viable strategy to achieve this”, the newspaper’s inability to even grasp at the hidden in plain-sight reality of ‘hectoring hegemons’ deliberately destabilizing Pakistan to get at its ‘loose nukes’ (see “Open letter to a Pakistani General”) is just as inexplicable as the famously trumpeting elephant in the newlywed’s bed that is often ignored until fait accompli. Then, ex post facto, all rush to write about it as quite obvious!
There are certainly other more harmless professions and honorable ways of making a living than being the purveyors of falsehood. Either the newspaper openly declares itself the new ‘TASS’ – the privatized extension of the State’s apparatus – or minimally lends rational and historical perspective to at least its editorials by transcending the stenography school of thought and going back to the heyday of journalism that understood its overarching mission to be the watchdogs upon the corridors of power – to the 1960s, to I.F. Stone – a period which courageously recognized that “Deception is a state of mind – and the mind of the State” (James Jesus Angleton, former head of CIA Counter Intelligence, 1954-1974).
Project Humanbeingsfirst.org, Email: email@example.com
Letter to Editor, The Nation, February 14, 2008 – Patsies on the ‘Grand Chessboard’
In the Nation’s article of February 13, 2008, ‘A profound manifesto of her beliefs‘, a detailed unveiling of the late Benazir Bhutto’s book was disclosed. Has this august newspaper become so memory challenged like the unfortunate victim herself that it cannot bring perspective to bear on the deception game being played on the ‘Grand Chessboard’? Not only was Benazir Bhutto made a patsy by the ‘hectoring hegemons’ as rationally deconstructed in “Who Killed Benazir Bhutto? In her own words!”, but the entire nation, not to mention the world, is again being made a patsy by deliberately “Perpetuating the fiction of Who Killed Benazir Bhutto”.
If the newsmedia cannot lend perspective to imperial monumental crimes against humanity and becomes so relegated to being obedient stenographers that they entirely mimic their masters whom they appear to exclusively serve as if they were the TASS of yesterday, perhaps it’s time to shut down the profession of journalism. If one cannot distinguish between the crimes of the ‘pirates’ and the ’emperors’, cannot apportion to them the guilt and culpability commensurate with their station, no reportage is better than being complicit in perpetuating mass deception for “imperial mobilization”. For then, at least, peoples’ own commonsense comes into play for the inalienable right to self-defense! It is the sowing of confusion and obfuscation that enable any ruling-elite to carry-on as vassals and client-states of ’empire’.
There are certainly other more harmless professions and honorable ways of making a living than being the purveyors of falsehood. Either openly declare yourselves the new TASS as the privatized extension of the state’s apparatus, or lend rational and historical perspective to every report by transcending the stenography school of thought and going back to the heyday of journalism that understood its overarching mission to be the watchdogs upon the corridors of power – to the 1960s, to I.F. Stone – a period which courageously recognized that “Deception is a state of mind – and the mind of the State” (James Jesus Angleton, former head of CIA Counter Intelligence, 1954-1974).
Project Humanbeingsfirst.org, Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Letter to Editor, Daily Times, February 08, 2008
The ‘Hectoring Hegemons’ insist on bringing to fruition the ‘outlandishly plausible’ pretext of how America will invade both Iran and Pakistan in ‘self-defense’. In a report in Pakistan’s largest English language daily, Dawn, on February 07, 2008, the following precious gem was noted: ‘Defence officials told Congress on Wednesday that Al Qaeda is operating from havens in “under-governed regions” of Pakistan, which they said pose direct threats to Europe, the United States and the Pakistan government itself.’ The report presciently continued, almost as if in sympathetic baby-step realization of the outlandish ‘self-defense’ scenario already laid out in this scribe’s wakeup call (http://humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2007/12/wakeup-grotesque-reality-grand.html): ‘Adm. Michael Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, predicted in written testimony that the next attack on the United States probably would be launched by terrorists in that region.’
Since the writing of this wakeup call, Benazir Bhutto (http://humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2008/02/who-killed-benazir-bhutto-herownwords.html) was assassinated only a week later to further the ‘strategy of tension‘ in Pakistan, while simultaneously lending more substance to the boogieman of ‘al-qaeeda’ who was immediately blamed the very next day (or was purported to have claimed responsibility as noted by Daily Times, December 29, 2007).
The [earnest] Najam Sethi of Daily Times, displaying his own considerable forensic expertise, had noted in his own news analysis in the same edition at the time: ‘Shortly before she returned to Pakistan, Daily Times reported a statement by Baitullah Mehsud, an Al Qaeda-Taliban warlord based in Waziristan, saying that he had trained “hundreds of suicide bombers” and was determined to kill Benazir Bhutto because she was an American agent.’
He further went on to complain: ‘But sections of the media sympathetic to Al Qaeda’s anti-American aims and objectives now quickly pounced on Daily Times and accused it of wilfully carrying an erroneous report.’ And then, the veteran journalist laid out the same mantra as the hectoring hegemons: ‘Why is it difficult to believe that the same Islamist network that tried to eliminate President Musharraf, Shaukat Aziz, Aftab Sherpao and Benazir Bhutto on October 18 may be responsible for her murder on December 27?’
I would humbly dare to suggest, that for the same reason as why the WMD’s did not exist in Iraq, or more importantly, as there does exist, in bright plain-sight of those not unwilling to see, the blueprint for world conquest on the ‘Grand Chessboard’ that employs the same paradigms and boogiemen that have now been made existential with copious help from co-opted and willing vassals the world over, like the Daily Times. Not to be left behind in the race for who helped win the ‘World War IV’ the most, the Scotland Yard, who was asked to investigate the assassination, before they had even fully embarked on their forensic journey had already noted “Scotland Yard believes Al-Qaeda assassinated Benazir Bhutto” (Times Online, January 13, 2008).
And today, February 08, 2008, the NY Times reported that the Scotland Yard has offered the JFK vintage ‘lone gunman’ theory, pinning the blame on the ubiquitous cavemen of ‘al-qaeeda’ sitting with their laptops and Klashnikovs in the Hindu Kush monitoring, controlling, and threatening the world’s foremost armed to the teeth superpower and its allies.
In support of the Scotland Yard’s conclusions, Pakistan immediately made ‘two more’ “important arrests”, as the Daily Times stenographically echoed, continuing: ‘ “It is a major breakthrough. These two men were involved in the assassination and they are from a militant group which is relatively new,” the official said. “Their tentacles are from the tribal region and Baitullah Mehsud” ‘ (February 08, 2008).
The International Herald Tribune (February 08, 2008), perhaps more interested in journalism than stenography, aptly noted: “The findings support the Pakistani government’s explanation of Bhutto’s assassination in December, an account that had been greeted with disbelief by Bhutto’s supporters, other Pakistanis and medical experts.” The following was added by IHT for additional forensic clarity into the matter: “It is unclear how the Scotland Yard investigators reached such conclusive findings absent autopsy results or other potentially important evidence that was washed away by cleanup crews in the immediate aftermath of the blast,”
Next stop, a ‘terrorist’ act as narrated by Zbigniew Brzezinski a year ago (February 01, 2007, quoted in the wakeup call) before the US. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and Adm. Mullen before the US. Congress a year later (February 06, 2008, cited above). And rather unsurprisingly, the world’s foremost investigative bodies will entirely reach the conclusion-space already outlined in this wakeup call no differently from the Scotland Yard’s today.
It is perhaps also why, no English language daily in Pakistan, or the New York Times, has bothered to publish this scribe’s humble prognostication – they don’t like real forensic clairvoyance and uncomfortable deconstruction of reality! Only hard ex post facto ‘forensic’ data, as gleaned by the Scotland Yard, before the news media can determine “all the news that’s fit to print”!
What’s it gonna take for the Pakistan’s ruling establishment, and its press, to wakeup to the grotesque reality of simple arithmetic of ‘2 + 2 = 4’ on the ‘Grand Chessboard’ and to stop rehearsing the asinine mantra of ‘war on terror’ against the fabricated ‘al qaeeda’? An ex post facto narrative in ten-twenty years, a multi-million dollar book deal after the nation’s ‘descent into oblivion‘ * is complete, or the ‘morning after’? Post fait accompli of yet another ‘new pearl harbor’, there is no ‘red pill’ – only victims! And further exaggerated wet dreams of “full spectrum dominance” of ‘baboons’ in suits and ties passing off as hominids!
Stand-up today as the genuine hominid and unmask the impostors, or live in the ruins of humanity tomorrow as pet-zombies of the ‘baboons’ – for only the early-dead would have mercifully remained human! What a model of civilizational-progress in the modernity du jour whereby the entire specie is in a steep ‘descent into oblivion‘ due to a handful of parasites ‘who wage wars by way of deception’. The vast majority, 99.9%, have been silenced [into apathetically] “looking from the side”, while their co-opted local ruling elite control all sources of power to become the major cheerleaders and circus clowns of the hectoring hegemons – uncannily forgetting that six feet under, the hungry maggots can’t tell the difference!
* ‘arresting the Descent into Oblivion’ is the tentative title of this scribe’s forthcoming book.
Founder, Project Humanbeingsfirst.org, email: email@example.com
Letter to Editor, Dawn, February 08, 2008
The ‘Hectoring Hegemons’ insist on bringing to fruition the ‘outlandishly plausible’ pretext of how America will invade both Iran and Pakistan in ‘self-defense’. In a report in Pakistan’s largest English language daily, Dawn, on February 07, 2008, the following precious gem was noted: ‘Defence officials told Congress on Wednesday that Al Qaeda is operating from havens in “under-governed regions” of Pakistan, which they said pose direct threats to Europe, the United States and the Pakistan government itself.’
The report presciently continued, almost as if in sympathetic baby-step realization of the outlandish ‘self-defense’ scenario already laid out in this scribe’s wakeup call (http://humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2007/12/wakeup-grotesque-reality-grand.html): ‘Adm. Michael Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, predicted in written testimony that the next attack on the United States probably would be launched by terrorists in that region.’
Since the writing of this wakeup call, Benazir Bhutto (http://humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2008/02/who-killed-benazir-bhutto-herownwords.html) was assassinated only a week later to further the ‘strategy of tension‘ in Pakistan, while simultaneously lending more substance to the boogieman of ‘al-qaeeda’ who was immediately blamed (the very next day, as reported in Dawn, December 29, 2007) for the former Pakistani Prime Minister’s grotesque assassination.
The Scotland Yard, who was asked to investigate the assassination, before they had even fully embarked on their forensic journey had already noted “Scotland Yard believes Al-Qaeda assassinated Benazir Bhutto” (Times Online, January 13, 2008).
And today, February 08, 2008, the NY Times reported that the Scotland Yard has offered the JFK vintage ‘lone gunman’ theory, pinning the blame on the ubiquitous cavemen of ‘al-qaeeda’ sitting with their laptops and Klashnikovs in the Hindu Kush monitoring, controlling, and threatening the world’s foremost armed to the teeth superpower and its allies. In support of the Scotland Yard’s conclusions, Pakistan immediately arrested “Two very important terrorists” (as reported today in Dawn, February 08, 2008).
The International Herald Tribune (February 08, 2008) noted: “The findings support the Pakistani government’s explanation of Bhutto’s assassination in December, an account that had been greeted with disbelief by Bhutto’s supporters, other Pakistanis and medical experts.” The following was added by IHT for additional forensic clarity into the matter: “It is unclear how the Scotland Yard investigators reached such conclusive findings absent autopsy results or other potentially important evidence that was washed away by cleanup crews in the immediate aftermath of the blast,”
Next stop, a ‘terrorist’ act as narrated by Zbigniew Brzezinski a year ago (February 01, 2007, quoted in the wakeup call) before the US. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and Adm. Mullen before the US. Congress a year later (February 06, 2008, cited above). And rather unsurprisingly, the world’s foremost investigative bodies will entirely reach the conclusion-space already outlined in this wakeup call no differently from the Scotland Yard today.
It is perhaps also why, no English language daily in Pakistan, or the New York Times, has bothered to publish this humble prognostication – they don’t like real forensic clairvoyance and uncomfortable deconstruction of reality! Only hard ex post facto ‘forensic’ data, as gleaned by the Scotland Yard, before they determine “all the news that’s fit to print”!
What’s it gonna take for the Pakistan’s ruling establishment, and its press, to wakeup to the grotesque reality of simple arithmetic of ‘2 + 2 = 4’ on the ‘Grand Chessboard’ and to stop rehearsing the asinine mantra of ‘war on terror’ against the fabricated ‘al qaeeda’? An ex post facto narrative in ten-twenty years, a multi-million dollar book deal after the nation’s ‘descent into oblivion‘ is complete, or the ‘morning after’? Post fait accompli of yet another ‘new pearl harbor’, there is no ‘red pill’ – only victims! And further exaggerated wet dreams of “full spectrum dominance” of ‘baboons’ in suits and ties passing off as hominids!
Stand-up today as the genuine hominid and unmask the impostors, or live in the ruins of humanity tomorrow as pet-zombies of the ‘baboons’ – for only the early-dead would have mercifully remained human! What a model of civilizational-progress in the modernity du jour whereby the entire specie is in a steep ‘descent into oblivion‘ due to a handful of parasites ‘who wage wars by way of deception’ while the vast majority, 99.9%, remain silently bespectating “looking from the side”!
Founder, Project Humanbeingsfirst.org, email: firstname.lastname@example.org
THE Pakistan Decapitation Papers 678 pages 4th Edition Back to Table of Contents